Log In
I just acquired a 1896 Winchester 94 ser# in the 59,000’s with this marking on it but the Tacoma address. Fascinating info.
Steve
December 30, 2011
Offline
Here’s something else that came up on google that a few of you may be interested in. From the National Hardware Bulletin:
I also found one of these recently. Definitely not without flaws but I’m happy to have one around.
February 19, 2013
Offline
there is one of those sames sights on ebay for $999.99!
November 7, 2015
Offline
Intersesting little sight, Brad. Congrats!
April 1, 2005
Offline
April 1, 2005
Offline
Thanks Brad – I have had the 86 for about 30 years. It has a matted barrel which makes it pretty rare. There is an article in the Winchester Collector (Summer 2007) which says only 206 matted barrel 86’s were produced (all calibers). Do you know of anyone doing research and recording serial numbers on the Model 86 because there are two other’s just like this one I would like to find, if they even survived. I have a copy of the page from the ledger where they were recorded and all three are exactly the same, including the matted barrel, hand made stock and the Barringer sight we have been discussing. All three were shipped the same day to the same order number. My gun is # 109591 – the other two are 109592 and 109588. Burt
April 15, 2005
Offline
Burt,
Get in touch with John Madl. If anyone knows how many were made with a matted barrel, it will be him.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
April 1, 2005
Offline
Bert – I do not know Mr. Madl. Is it possible to get in touch with him thru this forum. The article in the Summer 2007 Collector states “John Madl indicates that in his extensive research of the Model 1886 he has identified a total of 206 Model 1886’s in all calibers that shipped with matted barrels, of which 20 were chambered in 33 WCF” – my rifle is a 45-90. What I was really trying to find out is if anyone is keeping enough information on 1886’s like you do on Model 1894 variations that would help me track down the other two guns which were shipped to the same order number as my gun. I have a copy of the ledger page and all 3 guns are identical – one is a consecutive number to mine, one is 4 digits prior. When you look at the configuration of the gun it really makes you wonder why someone would order three exactly the same. As always, thanks for any words of wisdom or help you may be able to provide. Burt
April 15, 2005
Offline
Burt,
Very interesting rifle! I do not believe that John Madl participates here on the WACA forums (though it would be nice if he did). I do not know the exact extent to which John is tracking the Model 1886 with special features, or if he is tracking their location(s). Contact me off forum, and I will give you his contact information so that you can discuss it with him.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
December 30, 2011
Offline
John also has an article in the next Winchester Collector on his 50-105 EX research. The magazine should be mailed out very soon.
Burt: Your 1886 must have a very full entry in the original records. I would be neat to see someday.
April 1, 2005
Offline
November 7, 2015
Offline
That 50 sounds pretty spectacular, almost worth a drive to Alaska! The few entries I’ve gotten to see had remarkably good handwriting but they were from the 1920’s IIRC. This entry does seem a bit cramped but a practiced eye can probably figure most or all of it out.
I have a model 1894 Winchester in 32-40 caliber that was manufactured in 1898 (as close as can be determined from the serial number) it has double set triggers and a “Marbles” type rear sight. On the receiver, opposite the loading port is W E Sheard, Tacoma WA. My Grandfather on his way to Alaska stopped in Tacoma and had “some sight work done” as was told to me. The rifle is a family heirloom now.
April 15, 2005
Offline
Hello Craig,
What is the serial number on your Model 1894? With it, the exact date it was manufactured can be determined.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
November 1, 2013
Offline
Craig Michigan said
I have a model 1894 Winchester in 32-40 caliber that was manufactured in 1898 (as close as can be determined from the serial number) it has double set triggers and a “Marbles” type rear sight. On the receiver, opposite the loading port is W E Sheard, Tacoma WA. My Grandfather on his way to Alaska stopped in Tacoma and had “some sight work done” as was told to me. The rifle is a family heirloom now.
I believe Sheard sold guns as well as making sights, so is it possible your grandfather bought the gun there? I wouldn’t be too thrilled to find a dealer’s marking added to my gun if I had merely left it there for some minor work; although you’d think changing front & rear sights could be done while the customer waited. Marbles later bought out Sheard’s sight business.
November 2, 2009
Offline
I’ve owned a number of Sheard marked sights in the past, most marked Livingston and a few with the Tacoma marking. I had a standard, very high condition 1893 Marlin in .38-55 with the same style sight shown in Brads photos. Also had a model 1880 plyer handle Winchester reloading tool in .50-95 Express that was marked W.F. Sheard, Livingston.
March 31, 2009
Offline
You have to remember that in the mid to late 1800’s there were very few major gun dealers/manufacturers west of the Mississippi. Sheard was one of them. I believe finding these marks or sights on a gun is almost like finding the Browning Bros stamp. It clearly is a sign that this gun was in the West and I feel brings some interesting provenance to the gun. It may not add to the price but it definitely does not detract.
November 2, 2009
Offline
I agree with Chuck. From what I know of the items I’ve seen marked by Sheard, it appears that many things that came through his shop, were marked with his cartouche. Not unlike Browning. Have to keep in mind that these items are all of great interest to true collectors and help tell the story of those times. Seems like with what is happening in this country today, small pieces like this should remind of our history. We’re taking our past for granted.
April 1, 2005
Offline
Brad Dunbar said
Hi Burt
I saved this image quite awhile ago, I think from ebay, maybe someone here bought or sold it. For starters, does your rear sight look like this, without the MARBLE? I’m not especially familiar with these but do know they can be quite valuable, definitely when intact.
This is a scan from one of my Hunter Tader Trapper magazines from 1912. I do know from looking at catalogs and advertisements that WF Sheard advertised his sights from Tacoma while simultaneously they were advertised by Marble Safety Axe Co. and at times noted in their catalogs as “made under contract” or “made by MSA Co.” Likewise, Marble noted the same for King sights, at least for a time.
I did a Google search on Barringer and this came up first, not exactly the same thing. However, I see Daniel M. Barringer had additonal gun sight patents cited by others:
https://www.google.com/patents/US494240?dq=barringer+rear+sight+for+firearms&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiC28q9pq7TAhVo74MKHSCLD0kQ6AEIIzAA
Here is an old post with some information Tom is looking for regarding the Barringer sight.
1 Guest(s)
