Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters




sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_Print sp_TopicIcon
Real "1 of 1000" 1873?
October 16, 2020
5:09 am
Avatar
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4
Member Since:
May 17, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Does anyone have any thoughts or comments about the authenticity of the 1873 “1 of 1000” currently on Gunbroker for $180K?  (I am sorry that I do not know how to provide the link).  Thanks.

October 16, 2020
5:39 am
Avatar
Wisconsin
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4484
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: bob.1873man@gmail.com

October 16, 2020
5:56 am
Avatar
Troutdale, OR
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 960
Member Since:
June 26, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

That seller (used to be “Selling Dad’s Old Guns”) is notorious for selling fakes, guns in fake boxes, etc. I personally would not touch anything this seller has to offer.  Buyer beware.

October 16, 2020
6:46 am
Avatar
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 763
Member Since:
December 27, 2007
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Without looking at the firearm, I would still bet The Farm that it is not an original…based only on the reputation and history of the seller.

October 16, 2020
2:26 pm
Avatar
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 989
Member Since:
July 8, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

The serial number of the gun for sale is 31267, yet on the photo taken from the book (picture 6), shows a gun with serial number 31270.  How does this prove any provenance?

October 16, 2020
3:05 pm
Avatar
Troutdale, OR
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 960
Member Since:
June 26, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

tionesta1 said
The serial number of the gun for sale is 31267, yet on the photo taken from the book (picture 6), shows a gun with serial number 31270.  How does this prove any provenance?  

Ha! I missed that!  Most likely a made up gun to match a letter in my opinion.

October 16, 2020
5:07 pm
Avatar
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1964
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

The serial number on the letter is listed in the 1 of 1000 book.  The gun looks similar to what Roger, Turnbull or others can do.  I couldn’t comment further without holding the gun in my hands.  Turnbull has records, Roger had records.  Not sure where Roger’s records went?  Roger also marked all of his restorations, but in a place that is not easily seen.  Certain WACA members also know about restored Winchesters because they did stuff for Roger.

October 16, 2020
8:21 pm
Avatar
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1338
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I won’t comment on this one, but there’s a lot of high priced rifles out there made up to match a factory letter.  Makes me appreciate (all the more) some of my more lower finish pieces. 

October 16, 2020
8:21 pm
Avatar
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 31
Member Since:
March 15, 2020
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

It looked to me to be 2 different tang sights. Don

October 16, 2020
11:37 pm
Avatar
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 119
Member Since:
July 31, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Well, the front sight is not original to the rifle.  It’s a Lyman #5 combination sight which was not offered in 1878 when this rifle was supposedly made.  It’s not a Beach combination sight.  We have beat this horse to death over on the sight page.

Also, the tang sight looks suspect.  It looks like it might be a reproduction thin base (introduced 1887) graduated peep sight.

Finally, the dust cover looks like a reproduction to me.  

“Something is rotten in the state in Denmark”

October 17, 2020
12:10 am
Avatar
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1338
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Bill Hockett said
Well, the front sight is not original to the rifle.  It’s a Lyman #5 combination sight which was not offered in 1878 when this rifle was supposedly made.  It’s not a Beach combination sight.  We have beat this horse to death over on the sight page.

Also, the tang sight looks suspect.  It looks like it might be a reproduction thin base (introduced 1887) graduated peep sight.

Finally, the dust cover looks like a reproduction to me.  

“Something is rotten in the state in Denmark”  

Seeing who the seller was told me everything I needed to know about this rifle.

October 17, 2020
12:25 am
Avatar
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 442
Member Since:
November 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

One of the most historic and prominent 1 of 1000 73’s in existence, is coming up for auction at Rock Island in  early December.  This is serial #7282.   This rifle, from the collection of the late John E. Fox, was ordered by Granville Stuart in 1875.  I know this rifle very well as John was a close friend for almost 50 years and we lived just a few miles from eachother.

October 17, 2020
12:39 am
Avatar
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1338
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

win4575 said
One of the most historic and prominent 1 of 1000 73’s in existence, is coming up for auction at Rock Island in  early December.  This is serial #7282.   This rifle, from the collection of the late John E. Fox, was ordered by Granville Stuart in 1875.  I know this rifle very well as John was a close friend for almost 50 years and we lived just a few miles from eachother.  

Do you have a speculation what it will sell for?

October 17, 2020
1:45 am
Avatar
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 31
Member Since:
March 15, 2020
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Regarding the thumb print dust cover, my 1876 made in Sept. 1878 has a much finer pattern. I realize mine is 1876 but still was made 2 months before this one. Wouldn’t Winchester be using same covers within 2 months? Also, are those cleaning rods original to the gun? Very shiny and smooth. I have a 4 piece rod that I don’t know if is real or repro. I just measured the threads, 32 TPI on 1/4″ long shank. Comments will be interesting and welcome. Don

October 17, 2020
2:11 am
Avatar
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 688
Member Since:
June 4, 2017
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online

   Restored guns are just one part from a clone. When I see a restored gun the first thing I try to establish is what’s original to that gun, if anything. If a gun is bad enough to restore it’s hard to use the original parts, they become under size. In the case of an engraved barrel you have to remove the old engraving and cut new engraving making the barrel smaller. Any steel with pits, thin marking, or dings have to be welded then machined or stamped. The wood gets sanded and is under size. So they use good condition donor guns, the better the donor gun the nicer the finished product. On a 73 the serial number is on the removable lower tang. The best way to restore a 1 of 1000 would be to buy a very expensive donor gun in the same configuration and serial number range, change the lower tang, then send it to the restorer. It’s all made by Winchester and hard to tell the only thing that came on a 1 of 1000 is the lower tang. The cheapest way to restore is to buy a new barrel, tube, wood, and other misc. parts, but it’s easy to tell it’s not real. If you buy a restored 1 of 1000, you better have documentation to the restoration including before pictures. T/R

October 17, 2020
2:36 am
Avatar
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2577
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I’d offer this guy a quarter for a silver dollar…maybe…if I was feeling charitable…or feeling adventurous. Sad thing is this guy probably has some really good stuff but we’ll never know because we’ll never trust him.

 

Mike

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
October 17, 2020
3:53 am
Avatar
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 442
Member Since:
November 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

steve004 said

Do you have a speculation what it will sell for?  

I have an idea of it’s value right now, but the auction isn’t  until after the election.  I think things might change, depending on that outcome.  My catalogs should arrive in about 3 weeks.  I’m  anxious to see what estimate range RIA put on the rifle.

October 17, 2020
7:29 am
Avatar
Melbourne Australia
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 64
Member Since:
July 14, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

A man can never have too many WINCHESTERS...

October 17, 2020
1:41 pm
Avatar
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1338
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Aussie Chris said
Gunbroker 1873 ‘1 of 1000’  vs serial 31270.

 

pix858395900-1.jpgImage Enlarger01-17684x5-1-1.jpgImage Enlarger

 

https://www.poulinauctions.com/extremely-rare-and-fine-1-of-1000-deluxe-winchester-model-1873-lever-action-rifle/  

Amazing difference.

October 17, 2020
3:01 pm
Avatar
Wisconsin
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4484
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

There is a wide difference in the engraving patterns on the 1 of 1000’s if you look in the 1 of 1000 books so you can’t go by that instead you have to compare the engraving quality. The engraving on this gun in my option is not up to Winchesters standards, the barrel address is real as far as I can see.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: bob.1873man@gmail.com

Forum Timezone: UTC 0

Most Users Ever Online: 628

Currently Online: pdog72, TR, Big Mac
41 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)


Forum Stats:

Groups: 1

Forums: 16

Topics: 7747

Posts: 64770


Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 1051

Members: 9609

Moderators: 4

Admins: 3


Top Posters:

1873man: 4484

twobit: 2586

TXGunNut: 2577

clarence: 1989

Chuck: 1964

Maverick: 1632

Big Larry: 1462

JWA: 1374

steve004: 1338

Wincacher: 1185