Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Real "1 of 1000" 1873?
Avatar
centerfireman
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 4
Member Since:
May 17, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
October 16, 2020 - 5:09 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Does anyone have any thoughts or comments about the authenticity of the 1873 “1 of 1000” currently on Gunbroker for $180K?  (I am sorry that I do not know how to provide the link).  Thanks.

Avatar
1873man
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4703
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
October 16, 2020 - 5:39 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
deerhunter
Troutdale, OR
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2713
Member Since:
June 26, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
October 16, 2020 - 5:56 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

That seller (used to be “Selling Dad’s Old Guns”) is notorious for selling fakes, guns in fake boxes, etc. I personally would not touch anything this seller has to offer.  Buyer beware.

Avatar
FromTheWoods
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 532
Member Since:
December 27, 2007
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
October 16, 2020 - 6:46 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Without looking at the firearm, I would still bet The Farm that it is not an original…based only on the reputation and history of the seller.

Avatar
tionesta1
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1531
Member Since:
July 8, 2012
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
5
October 16, 2020 - 2:26 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

The serial number of the gun for sale is 31267, yet on the photo taken from the book (picture 6), shows a gun with serial number 31270.  How does this prove any provenance?

Avatar
deerhunter
Troutdale, OR
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2713
Member Since:
June 26, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
October 16, 2020 - 3:05 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

tionesta1 said
The serial number of the gun for sale is 31267, yet on the photo taken from the book (picture 6), shows a gun with serial number 31270.  How does this prove any provenance?  

Ha! I missed that!  Most likely a made up gun to match a letter in my opinion.

Avatar
Chuck
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5873
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
October 16, 2020 - 5:07 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

The serial number on the letter is listed in the 1 of 1000 book.  The gun looks similar to what Roger, Turnbull or others can do.  I couldn’t comment further without holding the gun in my hands.  Turnbull has records, Roger had records.  Not sure where Roger’s records went?  Roger also marked all of his restorations, but in a place that is not easily seen.  Certain WACA members also know about restored Winchesters because they did stuff for Roger.

Avatar
steve004
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5210
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
October 16, 2020 - 8:21 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I won’t comment on this one, but there’s a lot of high priced rifles out there made up to match a factory letter.  Makes me appreciate (all the more) some of my more lower finish pieces. 

Avatar
86Win
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 316
Member Since:
March 15, 2020
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
October 16, 2020 - 8:21 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

It looked to me to be 2 different tang sights. Don

Avatar
Bill Hockett
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 451
Member Since:
July 31, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
October 16, 2020 - 11:37 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Well, the front sight is not original to the rifle.  It’s a Lyman #5 combination sight which was not offered in 1878 when this rifle was supposedly made.  It’s not a Beach combination sight.  We have beat this horse to death over on the sight page.

Also, the tang sight looks suspect.  It looks like it might be a reproduction thin base (introduced 1887) graduated peep sight.

Finally, the dust cover looks like a reproduction to me.  

“Something is rotten in the state in Denmark”

I call myself a collector as it sounds better than hoarder

Avatar
steve004
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5210
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11
October 17, 2020 - 12:10 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Bill Hockett said
Well, the front sight is not original to the rifle.  It’s a Lyman #5 combination sight which was not offered in 1878 when this rifle was supposedly made.  It’s not a Beach combination sight.  We have beat this horse to death over on the sight page.

Also, the tang sight looks suspect.  It looks like it might be a reproduction thin base (introduced 1887) graduated peep sight.

Finally, the dust cover looks like a reproduction to me.  

“Something is rotten in the state in Denmark”  

Seeing who the seller was told me everything I needed to know about this rifle.

Avatar
win4575
Montana
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 700
Member Since:
November 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
12
October 17, 2020 - 12:25 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

One of the most historic and prominent 1 of 1000 73’s in existence, is coming up for auction at Rock Island in  early December.  This is serial #7282.   This rifle, from the collection of the late John E. Fox, was ordered by Granville Stuart in 1875.  I know this rifle very well as John was a close friend for almost 50 years and we lived just a few miles from eachother.

Avatar
steve004
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5210
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
13
October 17, 2020 - 12:39 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

win4575 said
One of the most historic and prominent 1 of 1000 73’s in existence, is coming up for auction at Rock Island in  early December.  This is serial #7282.   This rifle, from the collection of the late John E. Fox, was ordered by Granville Stuart in 1875.  I know this rifle very well as John was a close friend for almost 50 years and we lived just a few miles from eachother.  

Do you have a speculation what it will sell for?

Avatar
86Win
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 316
Member Since:
March 15, 2020
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
14
October 17, 2020 - 1:45 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Regarding the thumb print dust cover, my 1876 made in Sept. 1878 has a much finer pattern. I realize mine is 1876 but still was made 2 months before this one. Wouldn’t Winchester be using same covers within 2 months? Also, are those cleaning rods original to the gun? Very shiny and smooth. I have a 4 piece rod that I don’t know if is real or repro. I just measured the threads, 32 TPI on 1/4″ long shank. Comments will be interesting and welcome. Don

Avatar
TR
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1880
Member Since:
June 4, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
15
October 17, 2020 - 2:11 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

   Restored guns are just one part from a clone. When I see a restored gun the first thing I try to establish is what’s original to that gun, if anything. If a gun is bad enough to restore it’s hard to use the original parts, they become under size. In the case of an engraved barrel you have to remove the old engraving and cut new engraving making the barrel smaller. Any steel with pits, thin marking, or dings have to be welded then machined or stamped. The wood gets sanded and is under size. So they use good condition donor guns, the better the donor gun the nicer the finished product. On a 73 the serial number is on the removable lower tang. The best way to restore a 1 of 1000 would be to buy a very expensive donor gun in the same configuration and serial number range, change the lower tang, then send it to the restorer. It’s all made by Winchester and hard to tell the only thing that came on a 1 of 1000 is the lower tang. The cheapest way to restore is to buy a new barrel, tube, wood, and other misc. parts, but it’s easy to tell it’s not real. If you buy a restored 1 of 1000, you better have documentation to the restoration including before pictures. T/R

Avatar
TXGunNut
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6470
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
16
October 17, 2020 - 2:36 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I’d offer this guy a quarter for a silver dollar…maybe…if I was feeling charitable…or feeling adventurous. Sad thing is this guy probably has some really good stuff but we’ll never know because we’ll never trust him.

 

Mike

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Board Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
win4575
Montana
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 700
Member Since:
November 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
17
October 17, 2020 - 3:53 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

steve004 said

Do you have a speculation what it will sell for?  

I have an idea of it’s value right now, but the auction isn’t  until after the election.  I think things might change, depending on that outcome.  My catalogs should arrive in about 3 weeks.  I’m  anxious to see what estimate range RIA put on the rifle.

Avatar
Chris D
Melbourne Australia
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 254
Member Since:
July 14, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
18
October 17, 2020 - 7:29 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

A man can never have too many WINCHESTERS...

Avatar
steve004
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5210
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
19
October 17, 2020 - 1:41 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Aussie Chris said
Gunbroker 1873 ‘1 of 1000’  vs serial 31270.

 

pix858395900-1.jpgImage Enlarger

01-17684x5-1-1.jpgImage Enlarger

 

https://www.poulinauctions.com/extremely-rare-and-fine-1-of-1000-deluxe-winchester-model-1873-lever-action-rifle/  

Amazing difference.

Avatar
1873man
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4703
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
20
October 17, 2020 - 3:01 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

There is a wide difference in the engraving patterns on the 1 of 1000’s if you look in the 1 of 1000 books so you can’t go by that instead you have to compare the engraving quality. The engraving on this gun in my option is not up to Winchesters standards, the barrel address is real as far as I can see.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: slk, tionesta1, TXGunNut, Zebulon, Herr 54, JSB
Guest(s) 527
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6470
Chuck: 5873
steve004: 5210
1873man: 4703
deerhunter: 2713
Big Larry: 2559
twobit: 2505
mrcvs: 2213
Maverick: 2042
Newest Members:
djwalsh
fzando
WASpalding
WinKorm94
Wallyg703
GunLegacy
tcwyb
spikemiller
ob98
Ricky Summer
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14816
Posts: 132584

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10053
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation