Folks, I thought I’d share this story with everyone in the spirit of learning. Â Not everyone has decades of collecting experience and I bet all of us have made mistakes from time to time. Â I’d been admiring this gun at a local gun shop near my home for several months. Â I don’t usually buy from gun shops, preferring instead to make the majority of my purchases at gun shows. Â However, this was an exception as I thought I’d found a rare example of a Model 94 Special Short Rifle with a 21.5″ barrel. Â I’ve read about odd and half-size barrel lengths in Bob Renneberg’s book, but I’ve never seen one. Â This gun was old, rusty brown, and crusty and had “that look” of a well-used hunting rifle that probably spent its life on a south Texas ranch killing deer and hogs. Â Notice the notches carved in the forearm forward of the receiver in the third photo. Â I also noticed what appears to be a numerical stamp and someone’s initials carved in the stock. Â Interesting…but a 1920s serial number so too late to letter. Â
What really got my attention was the barrel length of 21.5″. Â Magazine tube was too short though, maybe a sign of previous damage?
First, I checked the muzzle end for obvious signs of tool marks indicating that the barrel had been cut. Â I couldn’t see any. Â I also looked for the slight chamfering around the bore. Â It appeared to be there. Â There was also a slight ding on the edge of the barrel, further supporting my theory that the barrel and/or magazine tube had been damaged at some point.
Original magazine tube end cap screw hole measured 3/8″ from the muzzle end, just like it should be. Â Maybe the barrel hadn’t been seriously damaged, just the mag tube? Â Someone had drilled a new screw hole in the barrel to accommodate a 20″ mag tube replacement. Â What was really interesting was that both the barrel and the mag tube had the same patina. Â Maybe really old damage from the early life of this gun? Â Â Â
Last week I told Bert about this gun at the Cody show. Â He encouraged me to examine it further. Â Bert encouraged me to drift the front sight out and see if the barrel was blued under the sight. Â Most barrels that have been cut down and the front sight dovetail recut will not be blued underneath the sight. Â A couple of quick strikes from my Wyoming Sight Tool didn’t move the front sight at all, so I had to break out the Brownell’s large brass front sight drift and give it a couple of hard hits. Â It finally moved and this is what I found. Â Too bad I couldn’t have done this at the gun store.
This was definitely not what I wanted to see. Â In hindsight, I made a key mistake when I examined the gun at the gun store yesterday before I bought it. Â I forgot to measure the mag tube retainer to see if it was 3.5″ from the muzzle to the front edge. Â As you can see, this one is not (off by about a 1/4″) and that was my mistake when I looked at this gun before purchase yesterday. Â I got way to excited when everything else looked/measured right. Â
Now the gun shop I bought this gun from has a 30-day return policy. Â Although it’s not what I thought it was, I won’t be returning this gun and here’s why… Â First, I like the way it looks because it reminds me of my late Uncle John who got me into collecting these old Winchesters almost 12-years ago. Â He would have absolutely loved the rusty, brown, well-used look of this one. Â His Winchester Model 94 Border Rifle is what got me really interested in these old guns all those years ago. Â Ironically, he made a similar mistake when he purchased his. Â Second, the gun store manager took an additional $100 off the asking price of the gun (it had already been reduced in price by $100 since I looked at it last month) and threw in this vintage leather gun case to carry it in. I’m confident that old leather case is worth something too. Â Finally, I like the look of this gun. Â It may not be a collectible Winchester, but the rifling is a strong 8-8.5 on a scale of 1-10. Â I think this old dog will kill deer and hogs all day and it’s just begging for some tender loving care. Â I’m not going to do much to this rifle, other than fix a broken screw and do some Acraglas bedding inside the stock to ensure a strong fit and no future stock cracks/damage. Â What do you guys think?
Chris
92TXAG said  A couple of quick strikes from my Wyoming Sight Tool didn’t move the front sight at all, so I had to break out the Brownell’s large brass front sight drift and give it a couple of hard hits.
 Â
My experience, too: worthless for any old sight. If you haven’t had experience working with Acraglas, I’d forget that. Case is relatively modern.
clarence said
92TXAG said  A couple of quick strikes from my Wyoming Sight Tool didn’t move the front sight at all, so I had to break out the Brownell’s large brass front sight drift and give it a couple of hard hits.
 Â
My experience, too: worthless for any old sight. If you haven’t had experience working with Acraglas, I’d forget that. Case is relatively modern.
 Â
Unless the sight is pretty loose, it’s not going to move it. Â I’ve had better luck with regular punches. Â Yes, lots of experience working with Acraglas…mostly learned lessons the hard way. Â
1 Guest(s)