Avatar
Please consider registering
Guest
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Register Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Questionable features on an 1892 rifle
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 7
Member Since:
February 22, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
February 22, 2021 - 1:37 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Just found this site today and I’m a brand-new Guest member.  I’m sad to say that currently my only Winchester is an M1 rifle.  Though I have previously owned a Second Model 1873 in .38 WCF (which I really wish I still had).

 

I recently purchased my first 1st Generation Colt Single Action–a 1903 vintage Bisley in .38 WCF.  So I have started looking for a rifle to go with it.

I my searches this weekend, I can across an 1892 rifle with a couple of odd “features”.  Anyway, things that don’t seem to fit in.  I have only seen pictures of the rifle in question.  The rifle is in the 630,000 range, so made around 1910-11.

 

1.  The rear sight has 3 folding leaves where the “standard” buckhorn blade would be.  Kind of like express sights.

2.  It has a shotgun (flat) butt with a checkered steel buttplate.  My old Blue Book doesn’t mention this being an option on 1892 rifles.

3.  There is a small extra hole in the left side of the receiver.  The hole appears to be about 1/8″ and is high up near the front and may enter the receiver in the barrel threads, or just behind.

Otherwise the rifle has little finish, but doesn’t seem to be rusted or pitted (much like my “new” Bisley).  Any thoughts on the above “features”?  Thank you!

 

Rob

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 876
Member Since:
September 28, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
February 22, 2021 - 3:59 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

The 3 leaf sight is a fairly common one, Shotgun butts were very common, I’ve got a 44-40 Serial #409,000 range, round barrel, shotgun butt with a checkered steel butt plate. Without seeing pics it’s hard to tell about the “extra hole”,  are you sure it’s not the access hole hole for removing the lever pin from the bolt?

Erin

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2290
Member Since:
December 31, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
February 22, 2021 - 4:41 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

[email protected] said
Just found this site today and I’m a brand-new Guest member.  I’m sad to say that currently my only Winchester is an M1 rifle.  Though I have previously owned a Second Model 1873 in .38 WCF (which I really wish I still had).

 

I recently purchased my first 1st Generation Colt Single Action–a 1903 vintage Bisley in .38 WCF.  So I have started looking for a rifle to go with it.

I my searches this weekend, I can across an 1892 rifle with a couple of odd “features”.  Anyway, things that don’t seem to fit in.  I have only seen pictures of the rifle in question.  The rifle is in the 630,000 range, so made around 1910-11.

 

1.  The rear sight has 3 folding leaves where the “standard” buckhorn blade would be.  Kind of like express sights.

2.  It has a shotgun (flat) butt with a checkered steel buttplate.  My old Blue Book doesn’t mention this being an option on 1892 rifles.

3.  There is a small extra hole in the left side of the receiver.  The hole appears to be about 1/8″ and is high up near the front and may enter the receiver in the barrel threads, or just behind.

Otherwise the rifle has little finish, but doesn’t seem to be rusted or pitted (much like my “new” Bisley).  Any thoughts on the above “features”?  Thank you!

 

Rob  

As luck would have it, I have a 1906 vintage M1894 30 cal. SRC carbine, and a Colt SAA 45 two months apart. The SAA 45 was shipped to the Copper Queen Mine in Bisbee AZ. Do not have a clue as to the shipment of the M1894. Both shipped within a few weeks of the San Francisco earthquake. Big Larry

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6150
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
February 22, 2021 - 5:49 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

[email protected] said
I’m sad to say that currently my only Winchester is an M1 rifle.

Owning a Winchester M1 is no cause for sadness!  I’d rather have it than the ’92!

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 7
Member Since:
February 22, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
February 22, 2021 - 6:07 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

I didn’t mean to say that having a Winchester M1 is something to be sad about!  Just that it is the only Winchester I currently own, which is sad from the standpoint of a Winchester Collector Forum.

WAIT!  EDIT:  I actually do have another Winchester.  Sort of?  It is a “U.S. Repeating Arms”/Miroku/Winchester 1886 rifle in 45-70.  Forgot I picked that up in November.

 

Here’s the left side hole I’m talking about:
Image Enlarger

doesn’t look like a mounting hole for any kind of sight.

 

Thanks.

 

Rob

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 876
Member Since:
September 28, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
February 22, 2021 - 8:44 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

[email protected] said
I didn’t mean to say that having a Winchester M1 is something to be sad about!  Just that it is the only Winchester I currently own, which is sad from the standpoint of a Winchester Collector Forum.

WAIT!  EDIT:  I actually do have another Winchester.  Sort of?  It is a “U.S. Repeating Arms”/Miroku/Winchester 1886 rifle in 45-70.  Forgot I picked that up in November.

 

Here’s the left side hole I’m talking about:
Image Enlarger

doesn’t look like a mounting hole for any kind of sight.

 

Thanks.

 

Rob  

Yep, That’s an extra hole.

Avatar
Ohio
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 383
Member Since:
May 26, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
February 22, 2021 - 9:29 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Having no Winchester would be sad…….

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4097
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
February 23, 2021 - 12:34 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Rob – what caliber is the M1892 chambered in?  You mentioned you are doing some searching.  Are you searching for a shooter, hunter, plinker or one to collect?

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 7
Member Since:
February 22, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
February 23, 2021 - 2:03 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

.38 WCF is the goal, to match the Colt I recently picked up.  Probably safe to say a low-end collectible shoooter.  I know really good examples are running well north of $2500, but I’m seeing even rough ones are looking like $1500 and above.  I paid $2k for this Colt, so I’m looking for a long gun “mate”.

 

Image Enlarger

Does that help?  I have a Marlin 1894 in 32 WCF and an “El Tigre” Win 1892 copy in 44 WCF, plus a Cimarron 1873 short rifle in 45 Colt from my CAS days.

The 1892 rifle with the “hole” that is subject of this thread is listed at $1500!

(The other option, of course, is to buy an Italian rifle, but even those are running $1200-1500 is seems.)

Rob

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4097
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
February 23, 2021 - 2:18 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

It’s to your advantage that you want a .38-40.  They don’t command the money .44-40’s command.  Are you set on a certain configuration – octagon barrel, round barrel, full magazine or?

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 7
Member Since:
February 22, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11
February 23, 2021 - 3:44 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

No, I’m quite open.  Win 73 or 92, or a <gasp> Marlin 89 or 94.

Looked at a basket-case Marlin 89 today.  Price was right at $725, but probably a bit lower condition that I would prefer.

Rob

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2283
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
12
February 23, 2021 - 2:36 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Good morning Rob,

I agree that the hole is not original and I have no idea why it is there.  The 630000 SN range corresponds to production in 1911.  Can you please post the other images of the rifle that you might have?  While the shotgun butt is not a real common occurrence on the 1892 the combination of shotgun butt, round barrel, and express sights was a common configuration for rifle shipped to England.  Is the magazine a full or half length?  What is the full serial number?  I am working on a research survey of the Model 1892/92 rifles and am glad to help.  Ask question before reaching for the check book.

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2283
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
13
February 25, 2021 - 9:46 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Hello Rob,

Thansk for sending me the images of the rifle.  I have added it to my survey.  It certainly appears that there are faint English Proof stamps just below the caliber stamp on the barrel and I am certain that it is like the many other rifles of identical configuration which were ordered for buyers in England.  I still have no idea why the extra little hole was drilled into the receiver.

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4517
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
14
February 26, 2021 - 5:34 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

twobit said
Hello Rob,

Thansk for sending me the images of the rifle.  I have added it to my survey.  It certainly appears that there are faint English Proof stamps just below the caliber stamp on the barrel and I am certain that it is like the many other rifles of identical configuration which were ordered for buyers in England.  I still have no idea why the extra little hole was drilled into the receiver.

Michael  

Could this be to relieve pressure?  Some other rifles have a hole similar to this.

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 7
Member Since:
February 22, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
15
February 26, 2021 - 6:34 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I was wondering if it was a required safety with foreign proofing, but don’t think I’ve seen it on other Win 1892s.  Like the “Hatcher Hole” added to US Springfields for added safety and gas release in case of a failed case.

I decided to pass on the rifle in question. Found a rough old Marlin locally to bring home for half the price.

Image Enlarger

Rob

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Online: dimrod, freebird1968
Guest(s) 120
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6150
TXGunNut: 4864
Chuck: 4517
1873man: 4259
steve004: 4097
Big Larry: 2290
twobit: 2283
TR: 1690
mrcvs: 1656
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12499
Posts: 108509

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1727
Members: 8716
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation