That’s a complex machining job. Why–to shave off a few ounces? If it wasn’t done at the factory, maybe a master-machinist doing it for his own use? I’m rather skeptical an individual owner would pay to have it done; shortening the brl would be a far cheaper way to cut the wt.
clarence said
That’s a complex machining job. Why–to shave off a few ounces? If it wasn’t done at the factory, maybe a master-machinist doing it for his own use? I’m rather skeptical an individual owner would pay to have it done; shortening the brl would be a far cheaper way to cut the wt.
Winchester did basically the same thing with the 95’s. They went from the flat sides and changed it to the lighter receiver with the lightning cuts. Even the forearm on this 86 has been altered to match the new contour of the receiver.
steve004 said
In reading the description, it looks like the seller wasn’t even aware of this modification.
Or chose to ignore it, not knowing what it was. The modification had to be done early in the rifle’s “life” as the affected area has the same “patina” as the rest of the receiver.
sb said
Not sure why a prototype would be produced at that point in production. I’d look at the letter and if there’s nothing unusual in it then I’d say it was an owner modification.
One has to remember that the lower tangs are what have the serial # and they are not an integral part of the receiver. The receiver could have been shelved for who knows how long.
sb said
Not sure why a prototype would be produced at that point in production. I’d look at the letter and if there’s nothing unusual in it then I’d say it was an owner modification.
1892 is not late in the production history of this model. Doesn’t seem inconceivable to me that some factory designer thought a lighter wt version might be an attractive option to some shooters. If it was an owner modification, that owner handed his gunsmith a blank check, unless he was competent to do the work himself.
I’m sorry guys but what detail about the receiver am I overlooking and not seeing? Want to make sure I’m looking at the right link as well.
What about the gun has been modified?
Sincerely,
Maverick
WACA #8783 - Checkout my Reloading Tool Survey!
https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-research-surveys/winchester-reloading-tool-survey/
Maverick said
I’m sorry guys but what detail about the receiver am I overlooking and not seeing? Want to make sure I’m looking at the right link as well.What about the gun has been modified?
Sincerely,
Maverick
Compare the first two pictures below with a standard Model 1886 receiver frame.
Standard
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
steve004 said
If not done at the factory, I’m especially curious about who did it and how. It sure looks like it was done very long ago.
The buyer of the rifle lives only an hours drive from John Madl, he has shown John the pics and he said John is leaning towards factory work but will hold his final verdict until he gets it “under the microscope” so to speak. If it does turn out to be factory work what a special rifle this is. The buyer may have gotten the “deal of the day” We will know more in a few weeks………….
1 Guest(s)
