Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters




sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_Print sp_TopicIcon
Opinions on '92 SRC 32-20
April 10, 2021
2:09 pm
Avatar
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2418
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

It’s an appeal of condition question.  I have never owned a ’92 .32-20 SRC – not due to lack of desire.  So, I’ve always looked closely at any that have come along.  They certainly aren’t common.  This is one Austin has on auction.  This is a carbine that looks like it saw very little wear and tear.  Most of this carbine is very crisp.  But that flaking…  To me, the flaking is is so unsightly, it drives me off.  I am wondering what reactions others have?  

https://www.gunbroker.com/item/896544736

April 10, 2021
4:47 pm
Avatar
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 485
Member Since:
March 21, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Well at least buying from Austin, you can rest assured that he is giving you an honest representation of the firearm. 

Beautiful 92 with the exception of the flaking.

IMG_0805-Copy-Copy-Copy.JPG

Winchester Model 1873 44-40 circa 1886

April 10, 2021
5:10 pm
Avatar
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 310
Member Since:
May 26, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I could handle it for the right price. 

April 10, 2021
5:10 pm
Avatar
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2418
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Kevin Jones said
Well at least buying from Austin, you can rest assured that he is giving you an honest representation of the firearm. 

Beautiful 92 with the exception of the flaking.  

Kevin – I agree with your points.  My question regarding the flaking – to what extant would that detour you from wanting to own it?

April 10, 2021
5:52 pm
Avatar
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 328
Member Since:
October 29, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I could live with it. Knowing that this is a common issue with some Winchesters. 

Shoot low boys. They're riding Shetland Ponies.

April 10, 2021
6:04 pm
Avatar
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 485
Member Since:
March 21, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

steve004 said

Kevin – I agree with your points.  My question regarding the flaking – to what extant would that detour you from wanting to own it?  

Personally, that would be a deal breaker for me, regardless of cost. 

IMG_0805-Copy-Copy-Copy.JPG

Winchester Model 1873 44-40 circa 1886

April 10, 2021
6:09 pm
Avatar
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 76
Member Since:
March 15, 2020
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I was buying an almost twin to that 92 recently. The flaking was not quite as noticeable on that one. Is this something common to..92s? We had agreed on $1000 for it and some ammo until his wife said NO because it had been her uncles gun. Otherwise I would have it now. Don

April 10, 2021
6:10 pm
Avatar
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2418
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Kevin Jones said

Personally, that would be a deal breaker for me, regardless of cost.   

Thanks Kevin.  I feel identically.  I’ve seen a lot of Winchester flaking in my time and it usually doesn’t bother me.  However, there are plenty of bidders on this one, so clearly some feel differently.  I am quite curious as to how high it will go.

April 11, 2021
12:53 am
Avatar
Kingston, WA
Forum Posts: 11837
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online

86Win said
I was buying an almost twin to that 92 recently. The flaking was not quite as noticeable on that one. Is this something common to..92s? We had agreed on $1000 for it and some ammo until his wife said NO because it had been her uncles gun. Otherwise I would have it now. Don  

Yes, it is common on the Model 92 (and its sibling Model 53).  Additionally, it is very common on the Model 94 (and its sibling Model 55).  The Flaking issue began with the guns manufactured in the early part of WW I and continued through the early 1930s.

WACA 6571L, Historian & Board of Director Member
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

April 11, 2021
9:23 pm
Avatar
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 328
Member Since:
October 29, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Bert H. said

Yes, it is common on the Model 92 (and its sibling Model 53).  Additionally, it is very common on the Model 94 (and its sibling Model 55).  The Flaking issue began with the guns manufactured in the early part of WW I and continued through the early 1930s.  

I have a 95 that has lost so much blue, it almost looks like stainless steel. No pitting. The metal is smooth as butter. I believe it is caused by the high nickel content.

Shoot low boys. They're riding Shetland Ponies.

April 12, 2021
12:50 am
Avatar
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 537
Member Since:
November 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I can and have accepted flaking on these higher serial numbers.  However, some are more attractive than this one.  In this  case, the way it flaked is not  attractive and not one I would pursue.  Just my opinion, but I don’t care for the look of this one.

Forum Timezone: UTC 0

Most Users Ever Online: 628

Currently Online: Bert H., mrcvs, DannyBoy, JayHawk44's Dad
64 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)


Forum Stats:

Groups: 1

Forums: 16

Topics: 9155

Posts: 78858


Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 1234

Members: 10623

Moderators: 4

Admins: 3


Top Posters:

1873man: 4925

TXGunNut: 3341

clarence: 3217

Chuck: 2803

twobit: 2709

steve004: 2418

Maverick: 1792

Big Larry: 1631

JWA: 1605

RickC: 1390