Avatar
Please consider registering
Guest
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Register Lost password?
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 55
Member Since:
November 2, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
March 21, 2017 - 12:26 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost
sp_ReportPost

I have a question that I have not found a satisfactory answer for and I think it will be easy for you guys:

It seems to me that the 86/92 vertical locking bar system is far superior to the 1894 mechanism.   From what I have read Browning designed 94 to handle more powerful smokeless cartridges and to be “easier” to manufacture.   However I have read where earliest 94s were still blackpowder.   Maybe this had to do with scarcity of new smokeless cartridges.

Anyway my question is why the 86/92 action was abandoned when it seems to this neophyte to be superior?

 

Thanks

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12735
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
March 21, 2017 - 5:54 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost
sp_ReportPost

The twin vertical locking bar action requires a hefty sized frame for the rifle sized cartridges used in the Model 1886. The Model 1892 frame was smaller and lighter because it used pistol length cartridges. In order to make a lighter and slimmer frame capable of handling the longer rifle cartridge, John M. Browning created the Model 1894 action with its rear single locking bolt.

The Model 1894 from day one was designed for smokeless powder, even though the early rifles were made in 38-55 and 32-40 which were still blackpowder. The hang up with blackpowder versus smokeless powder in the Model 1894 was perfecting the nickel steel alloy for the barrels. Once that was worked out, production of the 30 WCF and 25-35 WCF chambered rifles began in mid-year 1895.

Bert

WACA 6571L, Historian & Board of Director Member
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 55
Member Since:
November 2, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
March 21, 2017 - 6:39 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost
sp_ReportPost

Interesting !   Thanks very much Bert

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 795
Member Since:
December 27, 2007
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
March 21, 2017 - 6:45 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost
sp_ReportPost

Always gifts of information to learn on this site.  Thank you, Bert.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 55
Member Since:
November 2, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
March 22, 2017 - 5:25 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost
sp_ReportPost

Just ran across this interesting article on the subject in the Winter 2006 Winchester Collector Mag., page 4:

Capture-1.JPGImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 628
Currently Online: JEREMY S., Chuck, nanzca, mrcvs, 426crown, Mark Douglas, Mark Trivett
Guest(s) 80
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
1873man: 5185
clarence: 4322
TXGunNut: 3904
Chuck: 3524
steve004: 3117
twobit: 2846
Maverick: 2019
JWA: 1828
Big Larry: 1765
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 16
Topics: 10432
Posts: 89908

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1434
Members: 11521
Moderators: 3
Admins: 3
Navigation