Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Model 1895 w/ Stainless Barrel
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Avinger, TX
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 47
Member Since:
March 24, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
December 10, 2017 - 5:45 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

F768110C-7DA7-4DFD-9423-6C53A66CE121.jpegImage Enlarger13C73EAE-E921-4BF1-A9A4-E5F764970EFE.jpegImage EnlargerDE22FA78-9DF3-410B-9AAE-FED019F300B5.jpegImage Enlarger5593CA5D-B71C-48A0-9D56-D991E2D41D4A.jpegImage Enlarger45FC0149-AD81-4B83-9E6A-E8FFAA6794FD.jpegImage Enlarger9E969A5E-DCDF-4A4F-85EF-40C864DB74BD.jpegImage Enlarger8227717E-3170-475F-A1A4-BCBE7C580FD9.jpegImage EnlargerI picked up a few Winchesters yesterday at a small estate auction.  I’m looking for info on this Model 1895 with Stainless Steel barrel and low serial number.  I looked through my Madis books and couldn’t find anything about it.  Any info would be much appreciated.  

WINCHESTER BABE

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12362
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
December 10, 2017 - 7:07 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

The first thing that I would do is call the CFM and get a research sheet for it.  The next thing I would do is pull the forend stock off, and inspect all of the markings stamped on the underside of the barrel.  At a minimum, you should find a 2-digit year number.  Hopefully, it will also have a work order number stamped on it, and the research sheet shows an R&R with the matching order number.  If you do take the forend stock off, please post pictures of what you find.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Avinger, TX
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 47
Member Since:
March 24, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
December 10, 2017 - 9:22 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bert,

Great info and advice.  Since I just picked this Winchester up yesterday afternoon, my plan was to order the letter first thing tomorrow.  But at the risk of sounding stupid, is the research sheet different than the Cody Letter?  

We are about to remove the forearm now.  I will post pics when finished.  

On another note, I picked up a Winchester Model 1892 with serial number 27.  I guess I should start a new thread for that gun, right?   

Darlene

WINCHESTER BABE

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12362
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
December 10, 2017 - 9:24 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Darlene,

The CFM research sheet will have the same information on it as the factory letter, but it is only available to members.

Yes, please start a new topic for the Model 1892.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Avinger, TX
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 47
Member Since:
March 24, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
December 10, 2017 - 9:53 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

5194C2C0-F044-4ACE-8D97-86E1E84DC466.jpegImage Enlarger5E685024-CE5E-43CD-B63A-80E34718FA53.jpegImage Enlarger0E32043E-4B69-4E61-8D5F-84EE225BD7FD.jpegImage EnlargerI am a member, thanks for the clarification.  Here are the pics from under the forearm.  The 2 digit number is 27, there is also an ST, also ARMY  and there are a couple markings that I can’t tell what they are.  Does this mean that it went back to the factory for the barrel in 1927?   

WINCHESTER BABE

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12362
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
December 10, 2017 - 10:38 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

No, it does not necessarily mean that it was sent back to Winchester in 1927.  The barrel was manufactured in the year 1927.  There is no way to know when it was installed unless the ledger records show an R&R in 1927 or later, which in unfortunately unlikely.

The “ST” marking is shorthand for “Stainless”, and the “ARMY” marking is the caliber.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Avinger, TX
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 47
Member Since:
March 24, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
December 11, 2017 - 12:04 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Good info, Thank You for all of your help.  What value would you put on the gun?

WINCHESTER BABE

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12362
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
December 11, 2017 - 2:12 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

At this point (not knowing if it is factory rework), I would prefer to abstain from answering that question.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Avinger, TX
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 47
Member Since:
March 24, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
December 11, 2017 - 2:59 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I understand.  Hopefully I will get some good info from CFM.  Thanks for your time.

WINCHESTER BABE

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 269
Member Since:
November 17, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
December 11, 2017 - 3:23 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

The rifle was originally made before PW proofs were used by Winchester. Now the rifle has proofs on both barrel and receiver. That is a good sign that the barrel was replaced by Winchester sometime after 1927 at Winchester. Winchester did often/usually proof mark the PW on such a rework on both the receiver and barrel after test firing the reworked rifle. If the barrel was sent to an outside of Winchester gunsmith for replacement, then the barrel would have a Circle P proof and none on the receiver. Winchester did not always do everything the same way over the years. But I have a 1895 early serial with similar proofed replacement plain steel barrel and receiver as well.

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12362
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11
December 11, 2017 - 4:04 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

CJS57 said
The rifle was originally made before PW proofs were used by Winchester. Now the rifle has proofs on both barrel and receiver. That is a good sign that the barrel was replaced by Winchester sometime after 1927 at Winchester. Winchester did often/usually proof mark the PW on such a rework on both the receiver and barrel after test firing the reworked rifle. If the barrel was sent to an outside of Winchester gunsmith for replacement, then the barrel would have a Circle P proof and none on the receiver. Winchester did not always do everything the same way over the years. But I have a 1895 early serial with similar proofed replacement plain steel barrel and receiver as well.  

Your logic is sound on this, but unfortunately, it is no guaranty that Winchester did the work.  There are simpply way too many fake “WP” (Winchester Proof) stamps out there in the hands of people with less than honest intentions.  This is not an absolute, but in general, there should be a work order number stamped on the bottom of the barrel, and it should match up with the order number recorded with an R&R entry. 

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6042
Chuck: 5471
steve004: 4936
1873man: 4612
Big Larry: 2494
twobit: 2446
mrcvs: 2088
Maverick: 1860
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14257
Posts: 126339

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2005
Members: 9698
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation