Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
model 1894 proof marks
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 156
Member Since:
June 12, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
January 24, 2025 - 7:07 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

At what serial number or date range did proof marks begin to be applied on Model 1894

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 596
Member Since:
April 1, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
January 24, 2025 - 7:13 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

antler1 said
At what serial number or date range did proof marks begin to be applied on Model 1894

  

In April 1905 in the 26,400 serial range (per Bert in a previous post) – (should be 264,000 range)

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 42
Member Since:
June 15, 2024
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
January 24, 2025 - 8:14 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Burt Humphrey said

antler1 said

At what serial number or date range did proof marks begin to be applied on Model 1894

  

In April 1905 in the 26,400 serial range (per Bert in a previous post)

  

I think a zero fell out in the 1905 s/n. It should read around 264,000.

I have a barrel that was attached to a receiver in the 254,000 block that was proof marked based on photos I saw. It’s still within striking distance of Bert’s guidance.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 156
Member Since:
June 12, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
January 24, 2025 - 8:18 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I can’t find Bert’s previous posts regarding the proof marks. Any link?

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 596
Member Since:
April 1, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
January 24, 2025 - 8:24 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Alaska94 said

Burt Humphrey said

antler1 said

At what serial number or date range did proof marks begin to be applied on Model 1894

  

In April 1905 in the 26,400 serial range (per Bert in a previous post)

  

I think a zero fell out in the 1905 s/n. It should read around 264,000.

I have a barrel that was attached to a receiver in the 254,000 block that was proof marked based on photos I saw. It’s still within striking distance of Bert’s guidance.

  

Correct – 264,000 s/n range – Pat – I found the previous post from Bert in a “proof mark” search. One zero off is not bad for my old eyes.

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12199
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
January 24, 2025 - 11:39 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

This is the best answer I can provide at this time…  All serial numbers > 270700 have proof marks.  If anyone has a Model 1894 in the range shown, please feel free to provide the details so that I can add it to the list.

Bert

Proof-Mark-Timeline.jpgImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 156
Member Since:
June 12, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
January 24, 2025 - 11:59 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Thanks Bert. As always you provide a wealth of knowledge that we all appreciate

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1292
Member Since:
December 21, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
January 25, 2025 - 12:02 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Ser#.270459 is proofed. Ser#. 266003 is not proofed

W.A.C.A. life member, Marlin Collectors Assn. charter and life member, C,S.S.A. member and general gun nut.

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12199
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
January 25, 2025 - 12:20 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

antler1 said
Thanks Bert. As always you provide a wealth of knowledge that we all appreciate

  

You are welcomeCool

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12199
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
January 25, 2025 - 12:22 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Henry Mero said
Ser#.270459 is proofed. Ser#. 266003 is not proofed

  

Thanks.  Do you have the received in warehouse date for both S/Ns ?Cool

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 596
Member Since:
April 1, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11
January 25, 2025 - 1:23 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bert H. said

antler1 said

Thanks Bert. As always you provide a wealth of knowledge that we all appreciate

  

You are welcomeCool

  

Amen to that – in the final years of his life, my old friend Tommy Rholes was saying fakery would ruin Winchester collecting if not kept in-check. It is so easy to get fooled, even if you have been collecting a long time. Over the years Bert has saved a lot of  guys a lot of money by sharing his knowledge.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 596
Member Since:
April 1, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
12
January 25, 2025 - 1:36 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Not 10 minutes after my last post here, I read the post on the Model 70 which knowledgeable guys know is not right. There is just too much money in nice guns for the fakery to ever stop. Every day guys are tucking away guns, especially from auctions, which are not right. Do your best to stay educated and get help from guys that are willing to share their knowledge.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1292
Member Since:
December 21, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
13
January 25, 2025 - 2:22 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

20250124_211902.jpgImage Enlarger20250124_211912.jpgImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

W.A.C.A. life member, Marlin Collectors Assn. charter and life member, C,S.S.A. member and general gun nut.

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12199
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
14
January 25, 2025 - 2:34 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Henry Mero said
20250124_211902.jpgImage Enlarger20250124_211912.jpgImage Enlarger

  

Thanks, that helps a lot.Cool  

My theory at this point is that June 1905 was the “tipping” point for proof marked vs. not proof marked as it applies to the Model 1894.

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: dane62, mrcvs, Chris D, oldcrankyyankee
Guest(s) 132
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 5929
Chuck: 5348
steve004: 4874
1873man: 4568
Big Larry: 2475
twobit: 2417
mrcvs: 2055
TR: 1838
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14060
Posts: 124366

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1977
Members: 9595
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation