stepnmud
Guest 
Guests
25-20 said
I think any bureaucrats that know that the law exists, assume a gun of that age to be decrepit and harmless wallhanger . (like an automobile, or almost any other machine that has spanned that era ) If they only knew that a first year 1894 or 1895 in excellent cond ,although rare , is just as functional , accurate , and lethal as a gun being manufactured with Winchester name from Japan today ?
Phil
then again, some of ’em might also be collectors.
Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online:   5406
Currently Browsing this Page:   
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters: 
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6670
Chuck: 5986
steve004: 5271
1873man: 4742
deerhunter: 2744
Big Larry: 2576
twobit: 2540
mrcvs: 2249
Maverick: 2050
Newest Members: 
ukuleleproposer
23Diesel
Odinsraven
BillWyo
Roll0000
ToddDavison
OLDERNROCKS
GilsonKnightsArms
Rafael
Botchan
Forum Stats: 
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 15001
Posts: 134590
Member Stats: 
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10177
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
© Simple:Press —
        
Log In
