stepnmud
Guest
Guests
25-20 said
I think any bureaucrats that know that the law exists, assume a gun of that age to be decrepit and harmless wallhanger . (like an automobile, or almost any other machine that has spanned that era ) If they only knew that a first year 1894 or 1895 in excellent cond ,although rare , is just as functional , accurate , and lethal as a gun being manufactured with Winchester name from Japan today ?
Phil
then again, some of ’em might also be collectors.
Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 5406
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6865
Chuck: 6190
steve004: 5369
1873man: 4794
deerhunter: 2787
twobit: 2586
Big Larry: 2578
mrcvs: 2298
Maverick: 2095
Newest Members:
XPLSV
djvernon
The Draw
MattSpencer
Bronco17
Edcamera
Rich44-40
Jacques Emond
DanPfromTexas
Emammad14
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 15276
Posts: 137686
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10341
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
© Simple:Press —
Log In
