stepnmud
Guest
Guests
25-20 said
I think any bureaucrats that know that the law exists, assume a gun of that age to be decrepit and harmless wallhanger . (like an automobile, or almost any other machine that has spanned that era ) If they only knew that a first year 1894 or 1895 in excellent cond ,although rare , is just as functional , accurate , and lethal as a gun being manufactured with Winchester name from Japan today ?
Phil
then again, some of ’em might also be collectors.
Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 5406
Currently Online: steve004, jolly bill, mrcvs, deerhunter, James Fenderson, Darrin Smith, Henry Mero, Louis Luttrell, Nevada Paul, [email protected], Jeremy P, Blue Ridge Parson, Alexander Sanguigni
Guest(s) 513
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6983
Chuck: 6334
steve004: 5436
1873man: 4816
deerhunter: 2824
twobit: 2605
Big Larry: 2578
mrcvs: 2318
Maverick: 2132
Newest Members:
Ned M
Pennview
SCWayne
Merchant of the Old West
wjw
winfan
Ranger55
GeorgeJ
Rshell
Stevepala
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 15409
Posts: 139326
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10389
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
© Simple:Press —
Log In
