
stepnmud
Guest
Guests
25-20 said
I think any bureaucrats that know that the law exists, assume a gun of that age to be decrepit and harmless wallhanger . (like an automobile, or almost any other machine that has spanned that era ) If they only knew that a first year 1894 or 1895 in excellent cond ,although rare , is just as functional , accurate , and lethal as a gun being manufactured with Winchester name from Japan today ?
Phil
then again, some of ’em might also be collectors.
Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: Bert H., tionesta1, antler1, TR, SureShot, Pwog, Bkmkok
Guest(s) 169
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6404
Chuck: 5806
steve004: 5172
1873man: 4696
deerhunter: 2693
Big Larry: 2549
twobit: 2493
mrcvs: 2192
Maverick: 2029
Newest Members:
cedar swamp savage
tradecraft
Weida78
Alby
Lambeau
Larsmack
usmc1978
Otisman68
Deaf Smith
Texasaggie19
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14705
Posts: 131581
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 9977
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
© Simple:Press —
