stepnmud
Guest
Guests
25-20 said
I think any bureaucrats that know that the law exists, assume a gun of that age to be decrepit and harmless wallhanger . (like an automobile, or almost any other machine that has spanned that era ) If they only knew that a first year 1894 or 1895 in excellent cond ,although rare , is just as functional , accurate , and lethal as a gun being manufactured with Winchester name from Japan today ?
Phil
then again, some of ’em might also be collectors.
Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 5406
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 1166
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6783
Chuck: 6121
steve004: 5326
1873man: 4784
deerhunter: 2782
Big Larry: 2578
twobit: 2573
mrcvs: 2285
Maverick: 2085
Newest Members:
ChapelHillBob
Gunnut
Dougfire10
dr.sober
Jalpha45
Wendell E. Atchison
Teddy
wpmcsg
Aussie Pilgrim
Deluxe1890
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 15194
Posts: 136713
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10290
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
© Simple:Press —
Log In
