Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Interesting 1886
Avatar
deerhunter
Troutdale, OR
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2692
Member Since:
June 26, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
February 23, 2016 - 3:06 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Letter states “muzzle countersunk.”  Never seen this before…

http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=543602065

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 356
Member Since:
April 14, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
February 23, 2016 - 3:55 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

This is really odd. Was this done for a trick shooter gun?

Walter

Avatar
deerhunter
Troutdale, OR
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2692
Member Since:
June 26, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
February 23, 2016 - 4:54 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

If this were designed for trick shooting, what are the advantages of a countersunk muzzle? Originally, I was thinking it was to protect the muzzle from nicks and dings??  No doubt an odd special order option.

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12843
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
February 23, 2016 - 5:47 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I am of the opinion that the countersunk muzzle was to help protect rifling at the muzzle face from damage.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Ed'sTrading
Guest
Guests
5
February 23, 2016 - 7:17 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Am I the only one that thinks this one is a little fishy? You would think that “rear sight as far back as possible” would put the sight much closer to the receiver. In fact , the rear sight on this one is in the standard location.  Not “3/8 in. back” like he states. Look at a factory short rifle, or an ELW; the rear sights are all much, much closer to the receiver. Also, would a 22″ barrel have a short forend? I have a 22″ 1876 and it has a shorter forend. Furthermore, the front sight looks like a fresh milled dovetail. Maybe I am paranoid, but this one seems goofy to me.

Avatar
Burt Humphrey
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 627
Member Since:
April 1, 2005
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
6
February 23, 2016 - 7:18 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I notice the front sight is screwed to the barrel though it is not noted in the museum letter. I have seen this on a lot of Winchesters, not just 86″s. I have an 86 with a notation from the records “Lyman front screwed to barrel”. Any idea how often this feature was noted in the factory records? Or, if it is not noted in the records should one assume it was done later? Burt

73del7.jpg

Avatar
Maverick
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2024
Member Since:
May 23, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
February 23, 2016 - 7:41 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Burt Humphrey said

I notice the front sight is screwed to the barrel though it is not noted in the museum letter. I have seen this on a lot of Winchesters, not just 86″s. I have an 86 with a notation from the records “Lyman front screwed to barrel”. Any idea how often this feature was noted in the factory records? Or, if it is not noted in the records should one assume it was done later? Burt

I believe that is just a Set Screw to hold pressure onto the base of the sight in the dovetail. To keep it from sliding out. I believe It doesn’t actually screw or thread into the barrel itself.

Sincerely,

Maverick

Avatar
Burt Humphrey
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 627
Member Since:
April 1, 2005
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
8
February 24, 2016 - 4:06 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I agree that the screw does not protrude into the barrel. In the Madis book chapter on sights, George notes “a small set screw is found on some front rifle sights; many of the sights which have the set screw are marked: PAT. Nov. 4 02”. The sight on my rifle says Lyman and has PAT OCT 6 95. You cannot read the entire word Lyman because of the screw. Does the note in the Winchester Book mean Lyman made some sights with the screw hole and could customers buy them directly or were they only furnished to Winchester. As stated earlier I have seen this screw in the front sight on quite a few guns and wonder how often these sights were placed on the gun at the factory and noted in the records.

73del7.jpg

Avatar
pdog72
Wyoming - Gods Country
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1285
Member Since:
January 26, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
February 24, 2016 - 4:10 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Ed\

Am I the only one that thinks this one is a little fishy? You would think that “rear sight as far back as possible” would put the sight much closer to the receiver. In fact , the rear sight on this one is in the standard location.  Not “3/8 in. back” like he states. Look at a factory short rifle, or an ELW; the rear sights are all much, much closer to the receiver. Also, would a 22″ barrel have a short forend? I have a 22″ 1876 and it has a shorter forend. Furthermore, the front sight looks like a fresh milled dovetail. Maybe I am paranoid, but this one seems goofy to me.

Although the letter is interesting, I’m wondering about this rifle as well. I think the barrel has been made up, look at the octagon to round transition. I don’t know if the ’86’s had the short fore ends on short barrels but I guess I don’t recall seeing one.

                                                                               ~Gary~

                                                                                                                                                                              94-SRR.jpg

Avatar
Mike Hunter
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 352
Member Since:
January 24, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
February 24, 2016 - 1:00 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

The barrel looks a little “sketchy” BUT I wouldn’t discount it outright.   On shorter rifles, the rear sight was often moved rearward to increase the sight plane; the further the sights are apart, the more accurate the aiming. On shorter barreled 92s and 94s rifles, Winchester moved the rear sight towards the receiver ¾ of an inch.

 The octagon to round transition should be at a 45 degree angle, as noted earlier, the transition on the rifle in question doesn’t quite look right, but it might just be the picture angle.

The counter bored muzzle was to protect the muzzle rifling, generally fond on target rifles, but would also make sense on rifles that may see heavy woods use.

If I were serious about the rifle, I would verify the letter and insist on an inspection.

Avatar
Kirk Fitzgerald
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 125
Member Since:
February 5, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11
February 24, 2016 - 9:53 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Interesting discussion for an newbie. In a case like this if one wanted a inspection who , how would that be done?

Cheers

Kirk

Avatar
Brad Dunbar
Moderator
Moderator
Forum Posts: 986
Member Since:
December 30, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
12
February 25, 2016 - 1:25 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Burt Humphrey said

I agree that the screw does not protrude into the barrel. In the Madis book chapter on sights, George notes “a small set screw is found on some front rifle sights; many of the sights which have the set screw are marked: PAT. Nov. 4 02”. The sight on my rifle says Lyman and has PAT OCT 6 95. You cannot read the entire word Lyman because of the screw. Does the note in the Winchester Book mean Lyman made some sights with the screw hole and could customers buy them directly or were they only furnished to Winchester. As stated earlier I have seen this screw in the front sight on quite a few guns and wonder how often these sights were placed on the gun at the factory and noted in the records.

The Lyman patent may be PAT OCT 6 ’85.  Here is a link to that patent if you are interested.  If you have a regular Lyman front sight with a screw through it I think that could be out of the ordinary.  Any way to post a picture of it?

http://1drv.ms/1QFHwSp

The Winchester PAT NOV 4 02 is for the tinned tip bead on Winchester front sights.  The intent was to provide something more durable and less expensive than an ivory bead apparently.  That patent date is found on carbine blades and other sights that don’t utilize a screw and is not related to the screw to the best of my knowledge.

http://1drv.ms/1UmkNui

Winchester sporting front sights with the locking screw are very commonly found on many of the lever-action rifles.

Brad

Regards

Brad Dunbar

http://1895book.com/

Avatar
Burt Humphrey
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 627
Member Since:
April 1, 2005
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
13
February 25, 2016 - 4:08 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Thanks Brad – I just looked at the date on the Lyman sight with a loop and it is clearly OCT 6 95. My original curiosity and question regarded whether Winchester often noted this feature in the records when the gun left the factory. I have seen a lot of guns with the sight/screw and never previously gave it much thought. When I looked at the pictures of the 86 in this thread I noticed the sight/screw and also that it was not noted in the museum letter. As noted previously I have an 86 in which the Lyman sight screwed to the barrel is noted in the museum letter. In the last couple of days I have looked at 5 early guns with the sight/screw, all with museum letters. Not one of them has the sight/screw noted in the museum letter. I have not heard much response on this issue so I guess it does not arose curiosity in others. I did ask an old time dealer if he had ever seen a letter with the sight/screw mentioned and he replied that he could not think of any.

73del7.jpg

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: Burt Humphrey, Mark Douglas, Tedk, markone1966, SureShot
Guest(s) 114
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6400
Chuck: 5800
steve004: 5155
1873man: 4693
deerhunter: 2692
Big Larry: 2546
twobit: 2491
mrcvs: 2190
Maverick: 2024
Newest Members:
Larsmack
usmc1978
Otisman68
Deaf Smith
Texasaggie19
Diego
Bkmkok
Leonardb
Skysquatch82
cdavis5705
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14698
Posts: 131467

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 9972
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation