Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Flogging the WRACO Stamp
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2459
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
April 15, 2025 - 8:25 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

I know that this subject has been discussed several times over the years on the forum and various ideas of why a limited number of pre 1900 Winchesters were marked over the serial number have been put forth.  I will admit that I am not sold that a verifiable explanation has been found yet.  The most popular story is that Sears was behind it in an effort to get around some price limitations that were imposed by Winchester.  They were listing the various guns in their catalogs at pretty serious discounts to the same guns and prices listed in the Winchester catalogs. The 1900 Winchester catalog price for a solid frame octagon barrel sporting rifle was $19.50 vs $12.50 at Sears!!  The same gun at Montgomery Wards was $11.86!!!  The WRACO is only found on the 1892, 1893, 1894, and 1897 models even though Sears clearly was selling other Winchester models (1873, 1886, 1887, 1890, and 1895) at the same discounts at the same time. In addition, Montgomery Wards was selling the same guns at similar discounts.

There has been reference made to legal action taken by Winchester against Sears in the early 1900’s.  Do we have any attorneys in the mix here who could do some on line sleuthing as to what this may have been about?  That may or may not support the Sears connection.   I think that we all probably do not think that the “rifle sent back to Winchester and damaged serial number” explanation holds much water.  

I would also like to receive any photo of the stamp on different guns so that  I can build a library of information and try to find some common thread.  There is a difference between some of the stippling pattern that was used prior to the WRACO stamp being applied.  My email is [email protected]

WRACO-SN.jpgImage Enlarger

 

 

Montgomery Ward 1895 Catalog

FullSizeRender_2.jpgImage Enlarger

 

 

 

Sears 1902 Catalog

Screen-Shot-2025-03-26-at-9.20.13-PM.pngImage EnlargerScreen-Shot-2025-03-26-at-9.19.55-PM.pngImage EnlargerScreen-Shot-2025-03-26-at-9.11.18-PM.pngImage Enlarger

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12457
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
April 15, 2025 - 9:34 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

I have photos in my research files of at least a dozen Model 1893 & 1897 shotguns, and at least several Model 1894s.  Yes, the cross-hatch or stippling pattern was different from gun to gun.

 

I will assemble the pictures that I have and send them you later today or tomorrow.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
The Great State
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 793
Member Since:
April 30, 2023
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
April 15, 2025 - 11:53 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I’ve always liked the explanation that Sears was masking their price undercuts by buying through shill buyers and then covering up the serials to mask their trail….no evidence here though than all the stories or books I’ve seen and what makes logical sense. But I’m with you, I don’t buy the story of the factory doing it in any case.

Avatar
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6099
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
April 16, 2025 - 2:45 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Given the prevailing manufacturer/jobber/retailer relationships at the time the Sears theory makes the most sense but I agree there is probably more to the story. I’m thinking a marketing professor with an interest in this time period could give us some insight. It would make for an interesting case study.

 

Mike

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1883
Member Since:
May 23, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
April 16, 2025 - 3:14 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

The only thing that I’m currently aware of that may point to being a factory done procedure is the fact that I’ve seen some drawings that use the abbreviation W.R.A.Co. on them. Then of course also the same abbreviation being used on head stamps of shells and cartridges. 

But no true link or explanation to explain said markings on receivers. Just rumors and theories abound. 

Sincerely,

Maverick

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 218
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6099
Chuck: 5536
steve004: 4974
1873man: 4632
Big Larry: 2500
twobit: 2459
mrcvs: 2104
Maverick: 1883
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14329
Posts: 127240

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2009
Members: 9735
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation