Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
First Year Production 1894
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 20
Member Since:
May 5, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
October 20, 2024 - 2:00 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Recently I happened upon a four digital serial number (8319) 1894 Winchester and was wondering if the production date was indeed December 1894 and if this was a desirable rifle or if it was just your run of the mill 94? My assumption is that it is a black powder rifle due to the absence of “Nickel Steel” markings on the barrel. Thanks for any help you can provide.

Avatar
The Great State
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 578
Member Since:
April 30, 2023
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
October 20, 2024 - 2:04 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Until the 30 WCF (30-30) appeared in 1895, there were a couple of black powder calibers available, but the gun was designed for smokeless from the beginning is my understanding. Is the one you found a 38-55 or 32-40?

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 11668
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
October 20, 2024 - 2:58 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Agent1911 said
Recently I happened upon a four digital serial number (8319) 1894 Winchester and was wondering if the production date was indeed December 1894 and if this was a desirable rifle or if it was just your run of the mill 94? My assumption is that it is a black powder rifle due to the absence of “Nickel Steel” markings on the barrel. Thanks for any help you can provide.

  

Model 1894 s/n 8319 was actually manufactured in September of 1895 per the original factory records.  While you did not mention the caliber, I will assume that it is a 38-55 or a 32-40.  Regardless, it was designed for the early low pressure smokeless powder cartridges.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5635
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
October 20, 2024 - 4:03 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Mike-

There were very few 1894’s built in 1894, 1674 according to the Red Book. Your 1894 is most likely a Second Variation and as mentioned above is likely a. 38-55 or. 32-40. I’m very proud of my 4-digit 1994 (#5310) but quite honestly there are approximately 899 others, including yours. Some collectors place a premium on a 4 digit serial number, some do not. I have four Winchesters with 4 digit numbers but none of the four are remarkable in any other respect. IMHO it is somewhat more valuable than a 5 or 6 digit rifle or carbine but condition or features will have more influence on most collectors. In my eyes, it will never be a “run of the mill” Winchester but that’s probably just me. 

 

Mike

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 20
Member Since:
May 5, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
October 20, 2024 - 12:57 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Thanks everyone. It’s in 38-55

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: Mark0837
Guest(s) 385
Currently Browsing this Page:
2 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 5635
Chuck: 5037
steve004: 4691
1873man: 4494
Big Larry: 2452
twobit: 2357
mrcvs: 1973
TR: 1796
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 13552
Posts: 119702

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1909
Members: 9313
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation