Avatar
Please consider registering
Guest
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Register Lost password?
Avatar
Eastern Iowa
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 272
Member Since:
February 22, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
April 21, 2021 - 2:10 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Where did I read about ‘Extra Finish ’95 gun stocks at?  Can’t find the reference now….

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6168
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
April 21, 2021 - 11:53 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Catalogs listed on the “Extras” page an “extra finish” on case-hardened guns only.  No explanation of what it was.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1543
Member Since:
May 23, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
April 22, 2021 - 6:47 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Don’t forget about the NEW Book! I’d have to pull my copy to thumb through it, but believe it mentions Extra Finish in some detail.

https://www.1895book.com/

Sincerely,

Maverick

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6168
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
April 22, 2021 - 8:16 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Maverick said
Don’t forget about the NEW Book! I’d have to pull my copy to thumb through it, but believe it mentions Extra Finish in some detail.

https://www.1895book.com/

Sincerely,

Maverick  

So, Brooksy, looks like the answer to your question is going to cost you $90 + shipping.  Not that it’s not worth it!

Avatar
Eastern Iowa
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 272
Member Since:
February 22, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
April 22, 2021 - 9:46 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

clarence said

So, Brooksy, looks like the answer to your question is going to cost you $90 + shipping.  Not that it’s not worth it!  

I already have the book…I know that must be where I read about it, but I guess I’m too befuddled to find it again.Wink

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6168
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
April 22, 2021 - 10:58 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Brooksy said

I already have the book…I know that must be where I read about it, but I guess I’m too befuddled to find it again.Wink  

Send me the book & I guarantee to find it for you!

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 482
Member Since:
March 21, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
April 23, 2021 - 2:41 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

[email protected] said

Possibly in the back of Madis Book?  

Yep:

Scan0024.jpgImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

IMG_0805-Copy-Copy-Copy.JPG

Winchester Model 1873 44-40 circa 1886

Avatar
Eastern Iowa
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 272
Member Since:
February 22, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
April 23, 2021 - 2:16 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I found my brief reference in the new 1895 book on page 149.  I have a 95 that I believe qualifies as it has a curly buttstock and forestock and has been tapped for a tang site. It doesn’t appear a tang site was ever mounted.  I’m going to have to find a copy of that Madis book. I have something called the “Winchester Handbook” but there appears to be another book I don’t have.

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 482
Member Since:
March 21, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
April 23, 2021 - 4:49 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Brooksy said
I found my brief reference in the new 1895 book on page 149.  I have a 95 that I believe qualifies as it has a curly buttstock and forestock and has been tapped for a tang site. It doesn’t appear a tang site was ever mounted.  I’m going to have to find a copy of that Madis book. I have something called the “Winchester Handbook” but there appears to be another book I don’t have.  

I believe the “Winchester Handbook” is basically a condensed version of the Madis Book. 

Madis-Winchester-Books.jpgImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

IMG_0805-Copy-Copy-Copy.JPG

Winchester Model 1873 44-40 circa 1886

Avatar
Wyoming - Gods Country
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1267
Member Since:
January 26, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
April 23, 2021 - 6:11 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Here’s one I posted a while back that letters as simply “Fancy Stock”. I suppose its referring more to the grade of wood than the finish, but it definitely has a higher gloss finish than others I’ve seen. My “extra finish” may have been done after the fact but it makes no difference to me on this scarce of a gun. 

30″ Matted 1886 – Cody Show | What’s New! | ForumWinchester Collector

DSCN0087.JPGImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

                                                                               ~Gary~

                                                                                                                                                                              94-SRR.jpg

Avatar
Eastern Iowa
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 272
Member Since:
February 22, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11
April 23, 2021 - 8:31 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

pdog72 said
Here’s one I posted a while back that letters as simply “Fancy Stock”. I suppose its referring more to the grade of wood than the finish, but it definitely has a higher gloss finish than others I’ve seen. My “extra finish” may have been done after the fact but it makes no difference to me on this scarce of a gun. 

30″ Matted 1886 – Cody Show | What’s New! | ForumWinchester Collector

DSCN0087.JPGImage Enlarger  

WOW! That one has knock out wood.  Mine isn’t nearly as figured. Mine is more like ” Grade I Extra Finish” as described and pictured in the new ’95 book. I’ll get a couple pics. ’95’s are usually so plain and straight grained that any figure is a real bonus. Your ’86 is a real eye popper.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4108
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
12
April 23, 2021 - 9:13 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Brooksy said
I found my brief reference in the new 1895 book on page 149.  I have a 95 that I believe qualifies as it has a curly buttstock and forestock and has been tapped for a tang site. It doesn’t appear a tang site was ever mounted.  I’m going to have to find a copy of that Madis book. I have something called the “Winchester Handbook” but there appears to be another book I don’t have.  

Model 1895’s that are factory tapped for a tang sight are seldom encountered.  It seems years ago, I read that about 1 out of every 10 were tapped.  I’ve never owned one.  

Avatar
Eastern Iowa
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 272
Member Since:
February 22, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
13
April 23, 2021 - 10:00 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

steve004 said

Model 1895’s that are factory tapped for a tang sight are seldom encountered.  It seems years ago, I read that about 1 out of every 10 were tapped.  I’ve never owned one.    

Yep, odd eh? Looks like a factory job to me, I’ll get some pics.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4108
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
14
April 24, 2021 - 12:29 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Brooksy said

Yep, odd eh? Looks like a factory job to me, I’ll get some pics.  

I’m far from an expert on M95’s.  I’ve often wondered about those rifles that were tapped for a tang sight.  We know that for original purchasers, those that didn’t want a rear barrel sight or wanted more than a rear barrel sight, the Lyman side mount receiver sight was preferred.  My sense is relatively few 95’s were ordered with a tang sight.  My question is, what prompted Winchester to equip a small percentage of 95’s with tap holes for a tang sight?  Obviously, a rifle ordered with a tang sight would have the holes.  However, my sense is that many 95’s came with the tang holes that did not come with the tang sight. Why?

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6168
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
15
April 24, 2021 - 1:17 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

steve004 said

  I’ve often wondered about those rifles that were tapped for a tang sight.

I’ve often wondered, why not tap them all, like most other Winchesters–a trivial expense for the factory (ONE extra hole!), but considerable trouble to have it done by the customer who wanted, & was used to shooting with, tang sights. 

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4108
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
16
April 24, 2021 - 1:48 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

clarence said

steve004 said
  I’ve often wondered about those rifles that were tapped for a tang sight.

I’ve often wondered, why not tap them all, like most other Winchesters–a trivial expense for the factory (ONE extra hole!), but considerable trouble to have it done by the customer who wanted, & was used to shooting with, tang sights.   

Exactly.  What other Winchester centerfire rifle from that era didn’t have the tang tapped for a sight?  Even though the Lyman receiver sight was very popular for the M1895, it’s not like they came tapped for it.  Hence, except for that very small percentage of 95’s that came tapped, all the rest of came with no way to mount any type tang or receiver sight without having the rifle drilled and tapped. Confused

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6168
TXGunNut: 4889
Chuck: 4528
1873man: 4270
steve004: 4108
Big Larry: 2297
twobit: 2284
TR: 1699
mrcvs: 1673
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12526
Posts: 108827

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1731
Members: 8738
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation