Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Earliest date for a Winchester 1894 rifle in .30 Winchester?
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2057
Member Since:
September 22, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
February 1, 2025 - 4:32 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

What is the earliest manufacture, serial number, and/or ship date of such a rifle, in 1895?  And the serial numbers of each, assuming this rifle is not one and the same?

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12209
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
February 1, 2025 - 5:48 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

All of the information you are asking about is in the ARMAX Vol 5.

The attached pictures are scanned copies from the ARMAX document.

First by S/N

ARMAX-pg-105.jpgImage Enlarger

 

 

 

First by Date

ARMAX-pg-107.jpgImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2057
Member Since:
September 22, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
February 1, 2025 - 6:20 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Thank you!  And so the first .30-30 rifle, serial number 3314, was received in the warehouse and shipped on 29 May 1895, which predates it appearing in catalogue No 55, August 1895.  I was curious as to the earliest Winchester 1894 rifle chambered in .30-30 cake out after or before the first Savage Model 1895 in .303 Savage.  Savage Arms Company was founded on 05 April 1894 and I’m not sure if, or if not, their first Savage 1895 rifle shipped before or after the first Savage 1895 rifle.  Not that it matters, as neither was the response to the other and both were intended to be smokeless powder rounds chambered in .30 caliber. 

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1292
Member Since:
December 21, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
February 2, 2025 - 12:06 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Winchester obviously did something right, going by how popular the ’94 30-30 became in comparisson.

W.A.C.A. life member, Marlin Collectors Assn. charter and life member, C,S.S.A. member and general gun nut.

Avatar
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5940
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
February 4, 2025 - 10:51 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Cool thing about the Armax tables (at least for me) is that they suggest the possibility of a large batch of receivers (maybe 5000?) produced or at least started before production of the complete rifles. Even more interesting is that they apparently didn’t finish applying all the serial numbers before the second variation joined the party. It seems odd both variations were in production at the same time with some second variation guns bearing very early serial numbers. Someday I hope to have a first variation serialized after my somewhat early (5310) second variation. 

 

Mike

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12209
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
February 5, 2025 - 12:42 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

TXGunNut said
Cool thing about the Armax tables (at least for me) is that they suggest the possibility of a large batch of receivers (maybe 5000?) produced or at least started before production of the complete rifles. Even more interesting is that they apparently didn’t finish applying all the serial numbers before the second variation joined the party. It seems odd both variations were in production at the same time with some second variation guns bearing very early serial numbers. Someday I hope to have a first variation serialized after my somewhat early (5310) second variation. 

Mike  

The Polishing Room records do not show (suggest) any “large” batches of serial numbers for the Model 1894 in the early production years.  Typically, the batches were 20 – 40 receiver frames per day, and were not always that large, or produced on every single day.

The first known 2nd variation receiver frame I have documented is serial number 510 (PR date 11/5/1894), followed by 543, 545, & 547.  Thus far, I have documented (10) 1st variations with a serial number > 5310.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: Burt Humphrey, deerhunter, [email protected]
Guest(s) 142
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 5940
Chuck: 5361
steve004: 4880
1873man: 4568
Big Larry: 2477
twobit: 2418
mrcvs: 2057
TR: 1838
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14068
Posts: 124468

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1978
Members: 9602
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation