Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Current factory loads
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
RickC
Guest
WACA Guest
1
October 19, 2019 - 8:55 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Can anyone advise if current 45-70 factory cartridges are safe to shoot in 1886 rifles(pre 1895 ?). I know the receivers were beefed up to handle smokeless cartridges, but I’m not sure when & if current cartridge loads are safe.

AG

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 825
Member Since:
March 23, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
October 19, 2019 - 10:18 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

 To the best of my knowledge, the .45-70 shells loaded by Winchester at the present time, are loaded low enough to be used in any older .45-70 rifles.

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6280
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
October 19, 2019 - 10:28 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

28 gauge said
 To the best of my knowledge, the .45-70 shells loaded by Winchester at the present time, are loaded low enough to be used in any older .45-70 rifles.  

Hell, they’re safe in a Trapdoor Springfield, probably the weakest of all antique actions! 

Avatar
RickC
Guest
WACA Guest
4
October 19, 2019 - 10:35 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Thanks Clarence & 28 giage. Appreciated.

AG

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 347
Member Since:
February 18, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
October 19, 2019 - 10:55 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Stand down a moment please…
Excuse the nagging voice.  The ever-reminder and especially concerning century plus vintage guns; none to be considered safe to fire absent a proper inspection by qualified gunsmith!  Between forces of nature, ravages of time, abuse and ‘Bubba effect’… Simply the presumption of relatively mild pressure cartridges, nothing should be taken for granted in terms of individual gun capabilities!!!

My definite take.

Avatar
RickC
Guest
WACA Guest
6
October 20, 2019 - 4:05 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Thank you Iskra. Your comments are acknowledged & appreciated.

AG

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 825
Member Since:
March 23, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
October 20, 2019 - 8:07 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

clarence said

Hell, they’re safe in a Trapdoor Springfield, probably the weakest of all antique actions!   

   That was my understanding as well.Smile

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 825
Member Since:
March 23, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
October 20, 2019 - 8:13 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

iskra said
Stand down a moment please…
Excuse the nagging voice.  The ever-reminder and especially concerning century plus vintage guns; none to be considered safe to fire absent a proper inspection by qualified gunsmith!  Between forces of nature, ravages of time, abuse and ‘Bubba effect’… Simply the presumption of relatively mild pressure cartridges, nothing should be taken for granted in terms of individual gun capabilities!!!

My definite take.  

 I agree,but from the original post ,it was to be assumed ,the rifle was in good shooting order.The question as I understood it ,was if the present .45-70 cartridges made by Winchester ,were safe to use in older  Model  1886 rifles with less heavy receivers .Smile

Avatar
RickC
Guest
WACA Guest
9
October 20, 2019 - 8:21 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Yes that’s correct 28 gauge.

And irska the 86 is deemed safe to shoot.

AG

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6280
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
October 20, 2019 - 11:26 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

28 gauge said

   That was my understanding as well.Smile  

When I was 12 or 13, my father (who was always picking up junk guns, God knows where) gave me a cut-down Trapdoor, though I didn’t shoot it much owing to the cost of factory ammo, and not least, it’s kick!  I preferred to shoot it with 2″ .410 shells, which were murder on the Blue Jays around my house.  Then when I was 15 or 16, I bought with my own money in a pawn shop a butchered ’86 rebored to .45-70, which I safety-tested by jacking in a round & pulling the trigger.  I considered messing around with old guns to be far less hazardous than being chased by big dogs while riding my 5 HP Cushman scooter.

Avatar
RickC
Guest
WACA Guest
11
October 20, 2019 - 11:39 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

clarence said

When I was 12 or 13, my father (who was always picking up junk guns, God knows where) gave me a cut-down Trapdoor, though I didn’t shoot it much owing to the cost of factory ammo, and not least, it’s kick!  I preferred to shoot it with 2″ .410 shells, which were murder on the Blue Jays around my house.  Then when I was 15 or 16, I bought with my own money in a pawn shop a butchered ’86 rebored to .45-70, which I safety-tested by jacking in a round & pulling the trigger.  I considered messing around with old guns to be far less hazardous than being chased by big dogs while riding my 5 HP Cushman scooter.  

Hahaha can’t beat that one Clarence!!

AG

Avatar
South Texas
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1042
Member Since:
March 20, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
12
October 21, 2019 - 3:13 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Just do the bubba test, it works.  Go out to the big oak tree and wrap your arm around the trunk with gun in hand, and trunk as your shield, and fire it off into the ground.  Worst that can happen is you pull back a mangled hand Wink  

Aside from checking that the gun is in good working order and the head space is correct and barrel is indexed correct, and that there are no obstruction or problems with the barrel, what else is there to check?  TR mentioned some time back that you can get a crack in the receiver between the barrel and magazine tube (cant remember what model or caliber).  Ive not heard of much else going wrong with these things.  

One of the bad things that can happen is a prior owner bore out the barrel to a larger caliber and not mark it anywhere on the barrel or gun for that matter. 

DSC_0245-Copy-3.JPG

1892takedown @sbcglobal.net ......NRA Endowment Life Member.....WACA Member

"God is great.....beer is good.....and people are crazy"... Billy Currington

Avatar
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4969
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
13
October 21, 2019 - 4:09 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

There certainly are 45-70 factory loads that should not be fired in the Springfield and quite possibly in the 1886. Some rifles should not be fired with any load. It’s up to you to determine what is the proper action and if you don’t know, defer to someone who does or don’t fire it.

When a rifle goes from together to apart it matters little whether the load fired was 18,000, 28,000 or 40,000 CUP it’s going to be catastrophic to steel as well as flesh and bone. 
Let’s be careful out there, gents. We have no idea what these rifles have been through in the last hundred or so years.

 

Mike

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
South Texas
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1042
Member Since:
March 20, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
14
October 21, 2019 - 4:19 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Yep, caution, reason, and a little knowledge go a long way to protecting body parts.  Part of that caution, reason, and knowledge is knowing when something may not pass the smell test and an expert is needed. 

DSC_0245-Copy-3.JPG

1892takedown @sbcglobal.net ......NRA Endowment Life Member.....WACA Member

"God is great.....beer is good.....and people are crazy"... Billy Currington

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1710
Member Since:
June 4, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
15
October 21, 2019 - 10:35 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

 I second what Mike and Chris said. It’s a lot of fun to shoot these old guns but be smart about it. T/R

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6280
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
16
October 21, 2019 - 1:36 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

TXGunNut said
There certainly are 45-70 factory loads that should not be fired in the Springfield and quite possibly in the 1886. 
 

Current factory loads” is the subject of this thread. The 45-70 HV was last available, as far as I can tell from examining the old ammo catalogs I have, in the ’30s. It was loaded, I think, only by Winchester specifically for ’86s & HWs.  It’s listed in the ’33 WRA catalog, but can’t find it in ’39, nor in post-WW II catalogs like Shooter’s Bible.  I’ve never seen one of the 45-70 HV boxes, but the similar HV loadings for .32-40 & .38-55 have very obvious warning labels on them.  All of the regular 45-70 loadings by WRA & other ammo makers specifically name Springfields among the guns for which they are adapted.  So as far as I can tell, all these 45-70 HV loadings are now (expensive) 80+ year old collector cartridges which nobody in their right mind would be shooting. 

A possible exception might be ammo made by the Dominion Co. in Canada, which continued to offer HV loadings in 32-40 & 38-55 into the ’50s, long after US companies stopped making them.  But even those are now considered collector cartridges.  Do you know of any others?

Avatar
RickC
Guest
WACA Guest
17
October 21, 2019 - 5:36 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

I hope the folks on this forum can distinguish a beat-up junker from one in safe or good working condition. Caution is always paramount & yes if they aren’t sure they should have a qualified gun smith inspect it if they plan to shoot it, especially if the parts rattle like a rusty tambourine. I do hope nobody recommends having them all magnafluxed lol.

In all seriousness the comments are respected.

AG.

Avatar
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4969
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
18
October 22, 2019 - 12:38 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Yes, Clarence, I was referring to current factory loads. Even though I seldom shoot them I do keep up with the offerings available. Here’s a load I wouldn’t want to fire in an 1886;

https://shopcorbon.com/index.php?route=product/product&path=42_11_114&product_id=168

 

Mike

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6280
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
19
October 22, 2019 - 1:19 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

TXGunNut said
Yes, Clarence, I was referring to current factory loads. Even though I seldom shoot them I do keep up with the offerings available. Here’s a load I wouldn’t want to fire in an 1886;

https://shopcorbon.com/index.php?route=product/product&path=42_11_114&product_id=168

 

Mike  

That’s a real eye-opener, Mike!  I have Corbon .38 Spl. loaded in my Chief’s Special Airweight, & shooting them feels like a firecracker going off in your hand!  But didn’t even know they sold rifle cartridges.

Certainly wouldn’t care to fire these in a Trapdoor, but in an ’86 I think the worst that would happen in you fired a lot of them would be gradually increasing headspace & possibly an enlarged chamber, such as I have in a HW fired long ago (I suspect) with HV loads when they were still commonly available.  Somebody loan me an ’86 in 45-70, & we’ll find out for sure.  

Corbon’s description says only that they are “not loaded to SAMMI specs,” but if the packaging isn’t plastered with warning labels about using them in “antiques,” the company is asking for a lawsuit. 

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6280
TXGunNut: 4969
Chuck: 4571
1873man: 4281
steve004: 4160
Big Larry: 2323
twobit: 2291
TR: 1710
mrcvs: 1706
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12648
Posts: 109978

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1745
Members: 8791
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation