Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Correct Rear Sight for M1894 SRC?
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 40
Member Since:
March 2, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
May 8, 2017 - 9:06 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I picked up a rather unique Semi-Deluxe Model 1894 Saddle Ring Carbine a while back (s.n. 259777), and would like to restore as correct as possible.  It appears to be all original finish, with pistol grip and a crescent buttplate, and seems to need only a rear sight and a saddle ring.

I’ve seen a few offerings online, for big bucks.  But I picked up the parts at a gunshow this past weekend, and would like to hear experienced opinions.  I believe the sight is a model 44-A (?), with a u-notch slide.  Patina and wear are near perfect matches.  The saddle ring was marked as NOS, but maybe repro?  It also has no appreciable wear, and a little too much blue finish.

Enough talk.  Here are some pics, and thanks for looking.

 

http://i.imgur.com/2RrESnOl.jpgImage Enlarger

http://i.imgur.com/ffVMWnal.jpgImage Enlarger

http://i.imgur.com/aTFVciVl.jpgImage Enlarger

http://i.imgur.com/c1DOIzfl.jpgImage Enlarger

http://i.imgur.com/G0KSPH5l.jpgImage Enlarger

http://i.imgur.com/bfXeFxsl.jpgImage Enlarger

http://i.imgur.com/XY0ytwXl.jpgImage Enlarger

http://i.imgur.com/sC4d52Kl.jpgImage Enlarger

http://i.imgur.com/6uQ6vHJl.jpgImage Enlarger

http://i.imgur.com/3Ni0GhYl.jpgImage Enlarger

http://i.imgur.com/xZFtZOYl.jpgImage Enlarger

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10719
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
May 8, 2017 - 11:40 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

You have the correct sight, and the saddler ring and stud look correct to me (not a repro).

Bert

WACA 6571L, Historian & Board of Director Member
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 40
Member Since:
March 2, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
May 9, 2017 - 1:58 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Thank you, Bert.

I was pretty sure I had selected the correct parts, and the confirmation helps.

The rear sight will simply install and match up well.  But the saddle ring is going to stick out like a sore thumb.  Should I leave the finish as is?  Or is it sacrilege to give it a light rub-down to obtain a better match?

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 40
Member Since:
March 2, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
May 9, 2017 - 12:26 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Four entire minutes, and done.   Wish all restorations were that simple.

 

http://i.imgur.com/EkbwD5ul.jpgImage Enlarger

http://i.imgur.com/6wLwH13l.jpgImage Enlarger

http://i.imgur.com/H5bHX37l.jpgImage Enlarger

http://i.imgur.com/S8bywqLl.jpgImage Enlarger

http://i.imgur.com/BqZIT5dl.jpgImage Enlarger

http://i.imgur.com/rb43IiQl.jpgImage Enlarger

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 71
Member Since:
February 28, 2008
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
May 9, 2017 - 2:04 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I didn’t see anyone mention the crescent butt stock on this carbine.

Could this have been a special order option?

Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4276
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
May 9, 2017 - 2:19 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

The saddle ring stud needs to be tightened up a bit more so its horizontal.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4962
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
May 9, 2017 - 2:21 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Good job! I like your little SRC.

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 40
Member Since:
March 2, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
May 9, 2017 - 2:26 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

From Bert’s research and fact sheet of the early Model 1894 guns which were produced, the statistics which are applicable to my carbine are as follows:

Production ratios for the first 353,999 Model 1894s made:

1:5 (21.20%) were Saddle Ring Carbines (75,075)

1:2 (45.92%) was a 30 W.C.F. (162,568)

9:10 (91.6%) had a full length magazine (324,270)

1:718 (0.14%) carbines had pistol grip stocks (493)

1:584 (0.17%) carbines had rifle butt plates (606)

So, with a little extrapolation, or the 493 carbines with pistol grip stocks, 0.17% could have been fitted with the rifle buttplate, or an estimated .84 guns would have this particular configuration.

In other words, it might be the only one.  Or at the very least, one of a very few.

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 40
Member Since:
March 2, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
May 9, 2017 - 2:32 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

1873man said
The saddle ring stud needs to be tightened up a bit more so its horizontal.

Bob  

Yes.  Still a work in progress.

As of now, if I tighten as much as I dare, it is still 45 degrees away from horizontal.  I will likely gently file until it fits correctly.

This morning, I was just shooting for a reasonable color match.

Avatar
Oregon
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 475
Member Since:
September 29, 1993
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
May 9, 2017 - 5:27 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Martin:

That is a nice carbine.  A couple of comments:

1. I might suggest that you remove the saddle (sling) ring and carry it around in your pocket with a bunch on change and keys for a while.  Keep “jingling” it until the proper wear/color is produced.

2. Technically, the “U” notch in the 44A rear carbine sight is for carbines manufactured in 1914 and thereafter.  What you need is a “V” variant if you want it to be totally correct although most folks won’t recognize the difference.  See page 104 of the Madis sight book………….

WACA Life Benefactor Member

NRA Life Member

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 40
Member Since:
March 2, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11
May 9, 2017 - 7:42 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Rick Hill said
Martin:

That is a nice carbine.  A couple of comments:

1. I might suggest that you remove the saddle (sling) ring and carry it around in your pocket with a bunch on change and keys for a while.  Keep “jingling” it until the proper wear/color is produced.

2. Technically, the “U” notch in the 44A rear carbine sight is for carbines manufactured in 1914 and thereafter.  What you need is a “V” variant if you want it to be totally correct although most folks won’t recognize the difference.  See page 104 of the Madis sight book………….  

Thanks, Rick.  Still absorbing the carbine’s configuration significance.  And jampard’s question in regard to “special order” would seem to be the most logical conclusion.

I did have this at an auction house for an appraisal, and even offered to pay for a Cody Letter.  But after three months with no action taken (and no letter), I thought it best to just pick it up and post it here for evaluation.  Besides, I am sure to learn as much, if not more, from the collective experience of forum members.

 

1.  That’s a dandy idea.  Lord knows that enough keys and change inhabit my pockets to get the job done.  I will protect the threads, though.

2.  I did have reservations about the u-notch as being period correct.  But the sight base and ladder were too much of a bargain to pass up.  I suppose that now, I would only need to locate a v-notch slide if I chose to continue.

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 40
Member Since:
March 2, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
12
May 11, 2017 - 1:39 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I took Rick Hill’s suggesting for adding wear to the saddle ring to the next level. 

Instead of waiting a few months for the pocket carry with keys and change to soften the new machining, I simply sped up the process by dropping it in a small jar of nuts and bolts, and placing the jar into my brass tumbler for ten minute intervals.

Three trips inside the tumbler did the trick (thirty minutes total), at least to my satisfaction.

I also lightly filed the underside of the base, until the stud could be set tightly in the horizontal position.  Look good to you?

 

http://i.imgur.com/MdIqZbWl.jpgImage Enlarger

http://i.imgur.com/i4Unr0ul.jpgImage Enlarger

http://i.imgur.com/LtPlGivl.jpgImage Enlarger

http://i.imgur.com/l2GqjlEl.jpgImage Enlarger

http://i.imgur.com/j3gj8qQl.jpgImage Enlarger

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10719
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
13
May 11, 2017 - 3:06 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Nice job… it looks like it has been on the gun from day one.

Bert

WACA 6571L, Historian & Board of Director Member
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Online: gobblerforge, 1ned1, tionesta1, freebird1968, Paul K
Guest(s) 124
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6273
TXGunNut: 4962
Chuck: 4558
1873man: 4276
steve004: 4154
Big Larry: 2323
twobit: 2289
TR: 1709
mrcvs: 1701
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12628
Posts: 109816

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1743
Members: 8783
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation