Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Chambering in an old 1892
Avatar
BobSull
Ct
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5
Member Since:
December 20, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
March 2, 2026 - 4:31 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Hello Fellas, Just looking for a few opinions here. My 1892 32-20 mfg’d 1911 cycles fine (empty, that is), and shoots just fine. What I feel is not right is the effort required to chamber cartridges. I understand lever guns are generally not intended to be slow cycled, although I sometimes ask myself why that should matter. To successfully chamber rounds in this rifle, the action must be operated with firm determination, otherwise the cartridge rim hangs up in the slots on the cartridge guides. The receiver had been disassembled and inspected by myself for any apparent problems of which none were found. All appears well. As I handload, I suspected it may have been the Starline brass. I picked up a bag of RP brass with same results. I need to mention that my pre 64 Winnie Mod. ’94 has no such problem. Nor does my Marlin 1895. I’m now wondering if this may have been an issue with other ’92’s from this time period. Any thoughts greatly appreciated.

                                                                                                              Thanks Gentlemen,

                                                                                                                   Bob Sull.

Avatar
Chuck
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6476
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
Avatar
BobSull
Ct
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5
Member Since:
December 20, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
March 2, 2026 - 7:06 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Chuck, Being old school I’m not good at uploading, etc. Don’t know if you got my picture you asked for, but I’ll send it this way.IMG_20260302_124844718-2.jpgImage Enlarger

Thanks again

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Avatar
Chuck
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6476
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
March 2, 2026 - 7:13 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I got the pic but I am not the expert.  

Avatar
Anthony
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1518
Member Since:
December 9, 2002
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
5
March 2, 2026 - 8:51 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

BobSull said
Chuck, Being old school I’m not good at uploading, etc. Don’t know if you got my picture you asked for, but I’ll send it this way. Thanks again
  

Bob,

It’s a pretty well known fact, for many older Win. rifle shooters,  that you have to cycle the ammunition in Winchester Rifles with authority. Now with that being said, we should never assume that something inside isn’t suggesting a good cleaning, a worn part, (parts), and or some fine inspecting, and maybe even some light lubricating, not to hold dirt and debris, but to work the way these fine pieces were designed.

I have an older friend, that has a lot of experience in some pretty difficult situations, many years ago, as a Veteran, and he likes to always take his stuff down, and inspect, and even fine tune with, “Crocus Cloth”, (emery paper), as he likes to say. ‘Smooth as Silk”, I can often hear him say, as we visit often, and always seem to pass a firearm around, in between a cup of coffee!  Been doing it for years and I’ve been sold on it!

In most cases you just know if it feels right, or not! IMHO! 

Anthony 

Avatar
BobSull
Ct
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5
Member Since:
December 20, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
March 2, 2026 - 10:22 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Thank you Anthony, If the first point you state is in fact the reason, that would be fine. I could live with that. As I had personally disassembled and emptied the receiver of all internals including the guides, I’m inclined to believe this is the case. Retired now, but as a mechanic and machinist for my entire career I am a stickler for burrs, rough edges, etc. None of these existed. As mentioned in my first post, when empty, the action operates smoothly. Also keeping in mind that the 1892 design of the rifle was still very early on in the refinement of lever action rifles in general. Take care, Bob S.

Avatar
1892takedown
South Texas
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1159
Member Since:
March 20, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
March 4, 2026 - 2:30 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

It shouldnt be a chore to cycle these.  Check your right cartridge guide.  Does not look like it is fully in the receiver slot, which can happen if not fully aligned. You may have to set it within the slot and move it forward then back for it to fully seat within the receiver.  The second place you can loose some spacing is the left cartridge guide if the cartridge stop spring eye is not squarely in the eye recess on the back side of the cartridge guide.  That can cause an issue. 

Ive got a 25-20 and measured the spacing between the cartridge guides:  Front width is 0.353″ (furthest extent between the two guides towards front of receiver, at the cartridge head recess 0.430″, and at the back between the guides at the bolt 0.360″.  Check those items and see if something is not a little off.  

Chris

DSC_0245-Copy-3.JPG

1892takedown @sbcglobal.net ......NRA Endowment Life Member.....WACA Member

"God is great.....beer is good.....and people are crazy"... Billy Currington

Avatar
twobit
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2634
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
March 4, 2026 - 7:20 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

BobSull said
Hello Fellas, Just looking for a few opinions here. My 1892 32-20 mfg’d 1911 cycles fine (empty, that is), and shoots just fine. What I feel is not right is the effort required to chamber cartridges. I understand lever guns are generally not intended to be slow cycled, although I sometimes ask myself why that should matter. To successfully chamber rounds in this rifle, the action must be operated with firm determination, otherwise the cartridge rim hangs up in the slots on the cartridge guides. The receiver had been disassembled and inspected by myself for any apparent problems of which none were found. All appears well. As I handload, I suspected it may have been the Starline brass. I picked up a bag of RP brass with same results. I need to mention that my pre 64 Winnie Mod. ’94 has no such problem. Nor does my Marlin 1895. I’m now wondering if this may have been an issue with other ’92’s from this time period. Any thoughts greatly appreciated.
                                                                                                              Thanks Gentlemen,
                                                                                                                   Bob Sull.
  

Hello Bob,

I would like to add your rifle into my research survey of the Model 1892’s.  Can I please get the serial number and more information on the configuration, caliber etc?  You can read a bit more about it here:  https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-research-surveys/winchester-model-1892-all-rifle-survey/

Thanks

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 5406
Currently Online: mrcvs, tionesta1, Tedk, Anthony, Accumulator, James Allen Colvin Jr., SureShot, James W, Murdocrose
Guest(s) 341
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
TXGunNut: 7129
clarence: 7119
Chuck: 6476
steve004: 5531
1873man: 4848
deerhunter: 2856
twobit: 2634
Big Larry: 2578
mrcvs: 2363
Maverick: 2164
Newest Members:
Martin
ALongstreet
44 bulldog
kennet
John Ford
wa54
Orientphile
RobbyB
Bojangles
Deeluxe
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 15582
Posts: 141428

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10502
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation