Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Bucket List 1885 Single Shot Rifles—Bert and others
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
NY
Member
Restricted
Forum Posts: 7119
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
21
June 12, 2023 - 2:38 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Bert H. said
It is my belief that the chambers specifically made for the Everlasting Shells were slightly larger in diameter than the standard chambers. I am also of the opinion that the Everlasting Shell was a Ballard creation. Thus far, the only Winchester rifles I have documented chambered for an Everlasting cartridge are the 32-40, 38-55, 40-63 (a derivative of the 40-70 Ballard), and the 40-85 (a derivative of the 40-90 Ballard).

You’re memory is better than mine–they were developed by Marlin in 1876.  Dutcher devotes several pages to them, & noted that some users (but evidently a minority) complained that fired cases sometimes stuck in the chamber, which would provide a reason for requesting an oversize chamber.  But if the fired cases did not expand in the way standard cases did, I wonder why they would be more prone to sticking?  The loss of powder capacity in the 40-63 & 40-85 was due to the change from balloon to solid head case design.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 85
Member Since:
November 13, 2008
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
22
June 12, 2023 - 3:38 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bert H. said
It is my belief that the chambers specifically made for the Everlasting Shells were slightly larger in diameter than the standard chambers. I am also of the opinion that the Everlasting Shell was a Ballard creation. Thus far, the only Winchester rifles I have documented chambered for an Everlasting cartridge are the 32-40, 38-55, 40-63 (a derivative of the 40-70 Ballard), and the 40-85 (a derivative of the 40-90 Ballard).

Bert

  

Yes you are correct Bert. 

The standard 32-40 falls in rather loose. The chamber size on the 32-40 everlasting is noticeably larger. I dont think I would attempt to shoot a standard 32-40 in this one as I think it would punch the shell in the breech and not eject resulting in having to pry it out.   

Jeremy Scott.

WACA LIFE MEMBER, CFM MEMBER, ABKA MEMBER, JSSC MEMBER, MNO HISTORIAN 

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4871
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
23
June 12, 2023 - 5:37 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Jeremy Scott. said

Bert H. said

It is my belief that the chambers specifically made for the Everlasting Shells were slightly larger in diameter than the standard chambers. I am also of the opinion that the Everlasting Shell was a Ballard creation. Thus far, the only Winchester rifles I have documented chambered for an Everlasting cartridge are the 32-40, 38-55, 40-63 (a derivative of the 40-70 Ballard), and the 40-85 (a derivative of the 40-90 Ballard).

Bert

  

Yes you are correct Bert. 

The standard 32-40 falls in rather loose. The chamber size on the 32-40 everlasting is noticeably larger. I dont think I would attempt to shoot a standard 32-40 in this one as I think it would punch the shell in the breech and not eject resulting in having to pry it out.   

  

Ah – yes, I appreciate your information.  Bert’s as well.  That was the answer I was looking for – makes sense too.

Avatar
Santa Clara, CA
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 882
Member Since:
January 27, 1992
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
24
June 14, 2023 - 4:17 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

My desire was to find a nice 1885 in 22 W.R.F..  Not an easy find as I thought it would be.  The rifle may lack the high condition finish that so many desire, but it does have some unique features. Serial number 96715.   RDB  

 

85-W.R.F-001.JPGImage Enlarger85-W.R.F-002.JPGImage Enlarger85-W.R.F-004.JPGImage Enlarger85-W.R.F-008.JPGImage Enlarger85-W.R.F-009.JPGImage Enlarger85-W.R.F-007.JPGImage Enlarger85-W.R.F-006.JPGImage Enlarger

1885-H.-W.-Letter.jpegImage Enlarger

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12194
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
25
June 14, 2023 - 5:31 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

rogertherelic said
My desire was to find a nice 1885 in 22 W.R.F..  Not an easy find as I thought it would be.  The rifle may lack the high condition finish that so many desire, but it does have some unique features.  RDB  P.S.  Just discovered my pictures are too large to post.  I will add some when possible.

1885-H.-W.-Letter.jpegImage Enlarger

  

Interesting that it is a high-wall rifle, as the vast majority of the (669) manufactured in that cartridge were low-walls.

Please send the pictures to me.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2054
Member Since:
September 22, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
26
June 14, 2023 - 7:39 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bert,

It would be interesting to hear if you were assembling a collection of Winchester 1885 single shot rifles, what caliber and configuration would be “must haves” for you if you were to limit yourself to only perhaps a dozen or so?  Or perhaps a half dozen or so?  Or, if you could have only one, what would that be?

Or, perhaps you have already obtained those on your bucket list and, if so, which would be the last one or the last few you would sell?

Avatar
NY
Member
Restricted
Forum Posts: 7119
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
27
June 14, 2023 - 10:55 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bert H. said

Interesting that it is a high-wall rifle, as the vast majority of the (669) manufactured in that cartridge were low-walls.

 

If the customer ordered a #3 wt brl, it would have to be built on the HW rcvr.  Though I can think of no good reason for choosing a #3 for this cartridge.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4871
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
28
June 14, 2023 - 5:48 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

clarence said

Bert H. said

Interesting that it is a high-wall rifle, as the vast majority of the (669) manufactured in that cartridge were low-walls.

 

If the customer ordered a #3 wt brl, it would have to be built on the HW rcvr.   Though I can think of no good reason for choosing a #3 for this cartridge.      

The above statement makes me think about Bob’s extra-heavy barreled M1873 in .22 rimfire.   

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12194
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
29
June 14, 2023 - 6:33 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

mrcvs said
Bert,

It would be interesting to hear if you were assembling a collection of Winchester 1885 single shot rifles, what caliber and configuration would be “must haves” for you if you were to limit yourself to only perhaps a dozen or so?  Or perhaps a half dozen or so?  Or, if you could have only one, what would that be?

Or, perhaps you have already obtained those on your bucket list and, if so, which would be the last one or the last few you would sell?

  

Ian,

Over the past 40+ years, I have assembled a decent collection of Winchester Single Shot rifles (well more than just a “dozen or so”).  While I do not have every variation (yet), that would be my goal.  That stated, I usually buy any decently priced Single Shot I find that is still 100% factory original regardless of the caliber (an uncommon find today).

To assemble a complete collection, this is my list;

1. Plain Sporting Rifle high-wall (solid frame and Take Down)

2. Plain Sporting Rifle low-wall (Solid frame and Take Down)

3. Special Sporting Rifle high-wall

4. Special Sporting Rifle low-wall

5. Special Single Shot Rifle high-wall

6. Special Single Shot Rifle low-wall

7. Schuetzen Rifle 1st variation

8. Schuetzen Rifle 2nd variation

9. Schuetzen Rifle 3rd variation (Take Down)

10. Lightweight Carbine

11. Musket (center fire)

12. Winder Musket 1st variation (Solid frame and Take Down)

13. Winder Musket 2nd variation (Solid frame and Take Down)

14. Winder Musket 3rd variation

15. Shotgun (Solid frame and Take Down

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2054
Member Since:
September 22, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
30
June 14, 2023 - 8:35 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bert H. said

mrcvs said

Bert,

It would be interesting to hear if you were assembling a collection of Winchester 1885 single shot rifles, what caliber and configuration would be “must haves” for you if you were to limit yourself to only perhaps a dozen or so?  Or perhaps a half dozen or so?  Or, if you could have only one, what would that be?

Or, perhaps you have already obtained those on your bucket list and, if so, which would be the last one or the last few you would sell?

  

Ian,

Over the past 40+ years, I have assembled a decent collection of Winchester Single Shot rifles (well more than just a “dozen or so”).  While I do not have every variation (yet), that would be my goal.  That stated, I usually buy any decently priced Single Shot I find that is still 100% factory original regardless of the caliber (an uncommon find today).

To assemble a complete collection, this is my list;

1. Plain Sporting Rifle high-wall (solid frame and Take Down)

2. Plain Sporting Rifle low-wall (Solid frame and Take Down)

3. Special Sporting Rifle high-wall

4. Special Sporting Rifle low-wall

5. Special Single Shot Rifle high-wall

6. Special Single Shot Rifle low-wall

7. Schuetzen Rifle 1st variation

8. Schuetzen Rifle 2nd variation

9. Schuetzen Rifle 3rd variation (Take Down)

10. Lightweight Carbine

11. Musket (center fire)

12. Winder Musket 1st variation (Solid frame and Take Down)

13. Winder Musket 2nd variation (Solid frame and Take Down)

14. Winder Musket 3rd variation

15. Shotgun (Solid frame and Take Down

Bert  

Much thanks, Bert!  I really appreciate this thoughtful and in depth response.

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: tsbccut, M64lvr, Alaska94, ACFS2006, Gundog88
Guest(s) 141
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 5926
Chuck: 5340
steve004: 4871
1873man: 4568
Big Larry: 2475
twobit: 2416
mrcvs: 2054
TR: 1838
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14052
Posts: 124300

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1975
Members: 9593
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation