Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Antique 1894 - What do you think of this?
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 272
Member Since:
March 6, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10850
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
May 30, 2016 - 10:20 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

If the barrel is original, the serial number is not “888” nor is the rifle “antique”.  The marking on the upper tang would be useful in determining when it was manufactured.  That stated, the seller described it accurately enough.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 272
Member Since:
March 6, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
May 31, 2016 - 5:06 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Didn’t really early guns have an extra screw on the frame side? I remember something being different on really early guns.

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 378
Member Since:
July 7, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
May 31, 2016 - 12:14 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

400897-3.jpgImage EnlargerJust as Bert said, photos of the tang marking and barrel markings would help determine the general range of manufacture of this rifle but, I can tell you that the caliber marking on the side flat of the barrel makes this rifle s/n higher than 375,000 and from 1907 or later if the barrel is original to the gun. The extra screws you refer to are on first model receivers which would be from s/n 7500 or earlier. they are not extra, they just are on the outside of the receiver.  360800.jpgImage Enlarger  

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 272
Member Since:
March 6, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
May 31, 2016 - 11:17 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

94shorties said
400897-3.jpgImage EnlargerJust as Bert said, photos of the tang marking and barrel markings would help determine the general range of manufacture of this rifle but, I can tell you that the caliber marking on the side flat of the barrel makes this rifle s/n higher than 375,000 and from 1907 or later if the barrel is original to the gun. The extra screws you refer to are on first model receivers which would be from s/n 7500 or earlier. they are not extra, they just are on the outside of the receiver.  360800.jpgImage Enlarger    

Do you see the screws on the outside of the receiver on this gun?

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10850
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
June 1, 2016 - 1:30 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

wolfbait said

Do you see the screws on the outside of the receiver on this gun?  

Yes, I do, and it is not a 1st variation Model 1894.  99.9% of all 1st variation Model 1894s were caliber 38-55, and they were nearly all made before serial number 6000.  The pictures below show a 1st variation receiver frame, and the orientation of the screws.

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 272
Member Since:
March 6, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
June 1, 2016 - 5:14 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Interesting. So another remarked gun, and likely not even an antique as sold per the caliber location. I would like to see how good or poorly the 888 was done.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2306
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
June 1, 2016 - 7:38 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

wolfbait said
Interesting. So another remarked gun, and likely not even an antique as sold per the caliber location. I would like to see how good or poorly the 888 was done.  

It doesn’t necessarily have to be a “remarked gun”  With the seller stating:   Rifle has been polished and reblued, lettering is faint and blurred.  It may be a case of 888 is all that is left or visible of the original serial number.

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Avatar
Location: 32000' +
Moderator
Moderator
Forum Posts: 2119
Member Since:
July 17, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
June 1, 2016 - 11:06 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I second Michael’s comment.  Anyone that would fake an early serial number rifle is not likely to do an extremely poor buff and refinish on the rifle.  I suspect it is simply a case of some of the serial number being obliterated by overzealous polishing.

Regards,

WACA Life Member #6284 - Specializing in Pre-64 Winchester .22 Rimfire

http://rimfirepublications.com/  

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6388
TXGunNut: 5057
Chuck: 4601
1873man: 4323
steve004: 4261
Big Larry: 2353
twobit: 2306
mrcvs: 1727
TR: 1725
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12787
Posts: 111395

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1769
Members: 8872
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation