Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Opinion regarding Gunbroker 1886 in 45-90
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Troutdale, OR
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1874
Member Since:
June 26, 2013
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
1
June 28, 2013 - 9:02 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Just wondering what the experts think about this rifle.

http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=349988739

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10695
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
June 28, 2013 - 10:03 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

If that Extra Light Weight Take Down Rifle letters properly, the Buy It Now price is cheap.

Bert

WACA 6571L, Historian & Board of Director Member
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Troutdale, OR
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1874
Member Since:
June 26, 2013
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
3
June 28, 2013 - 10:25 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Do the sling eyes look original? Also, the caliber marking stamp seems light to me–is that normal? Does the wood finish look original and not refinished? How would I find out if it letters properly?

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2287
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
June 29, 2013 - 3:29 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

DH,

I think that the wood has been lightly sanded and refinished. In images 2 & 5 it appears that you can see the edge of the metal along the upper tang. In image 13 the bottom of the stock may be short of the butt plate edge. In image 17 it looks like the wood fit at the receiver on the upper side (right side) of the tang is sanded and rolls down toward the receiver. If it has been sanded it was very lightly. I always am suspect when a rifle does not have a single dent or blemish in the wood.

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 261
Member Since:
November 9, 2008
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
June 29, 2013 - 7:46 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

As stated above the cal. Stamp looks funny to me, and the front sight ramp is high, like a 33, all 45s I have seen have a low ramp. He doesn’t offer an inspection. It doesn’t smell right!

Avatar
South Texas
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1042
Member Since:
March 20, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
June 29, 2013 - 8:27 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I have to agree with you twobit, the wood looks to have been lightly sanded and refinished, look at the sharpness of the corners on the forearm wood and the buttstock wood at the buttplate appears to be rounded off a little. The tang area seems to look ok, although when you take just the slightest bit of wood off the upper wrist area, there tends to be a small gap between the wood and the metal when viewed from the top down. For as good as the wood looks it should fit tight. It may also be the photo quality but I tend to question the caliber stamp (like CJ57), especially seeing what looks like horizontal buffing marks across the width of the barrel between the rear sight and the takedown ring. There should be some darkness in the metal within the caliber stamp. The fact that it is being sold as-is gives it my walking papers.

DSC_0245-Copy-3.JPG

1892takedown @sbcglobal.net ......NRA Endowment Life Member.....WACA Member

"God is great.....beer is good.....and people are crazy"... Billy Currington

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Online: JWA, deerhunter, [email protected], Zebulon, Wyatt
Guest(s) 106
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6245
TXGunNut: 4935
Chuck: 4552
1873man: 4273
steve004: 4139
Big Larry: 2314
twobit: 2287
TR: 1704
mrcvs: 1692
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12594
Posts: 109506

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1738
Members: 8772
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation