Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
Avatar
NE OREGON
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 538
Member Since:
July 8, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
August 7, 2016 - 4:58 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

This 1894, 38-55 rifle is for sale at auction presently. It is serial # 877XXX (per auction), so has a DOM of 1918. What are the chances that this gun is original considering the condition of the bluing on the receiver at least? I’m not sure I’ve seen a rifle of this vintage that did not have some sort of flaking etc on the receiver, and most of them have lost a big % of original bluing on the receiver. I am a bit suspicious. I know the pictures are not great, but that is all that auction supplied.Thanks in advance.  Eagle

 

38-55-2.jpgImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12362
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
August 7, 2016 - 5:37 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I can not see anything in the picture that would lead me to believe that it is not what it appears to be.  The “flaking” problem first appears on Model 1894s manufactured just a bit later than this rifle.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
NE OREGON
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 538
Member Since:
July 8, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
August 8, 2016 - 2:11 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Thanks Bert. Would that be in 1920 or mid 20’s? Eagle

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12362
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
August 8, 2016 - 5:16 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Eagle said
Thanks Bert. Would that be in 1920 or mid 20’s? Eagle  

Very early 1920s.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
NE OREGON
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 538
Member Since:
July 8, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
August 8, 2016 - 1:54 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Thanks…and that bluing flaking problem went on until about when? Can I assume that the same thing went on with the 1892’s in the same period of time? Eagle

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12362
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
August 8, 2016 - 3:29 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

The flaking bluing problem went through the early 1930s.  It is found on the lever-action Models 53, 55, 92, and 94.  It is also found on a number of other models.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Location: 32000' +
Moderator
Moderator
Forum Posts: 2451
Member Since:
July 17, 2012
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
7
August 8, 2016 - 4:18 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Bert H. said
The flaking bluing problem went through the early 1930s.  It is found on the lever-action Models 53, 55, 92, and 94.  It is also found on a number of other models.

Bert  

It occurred on some of the bolt action Model 52 and 56/57 receivers during that period also.

Best Regards,

WACA Life Member #6284 - Specializing in Pre-64 Winchester .22 Rimfire

http://rimfirepublications.com/  

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 120
Member Since:
March 9, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
August 8, 2016 - 9:48 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I’ e seen it on a Model 59 22 as well

 

44

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 1118
Member Since:
May 24, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
August 8, 2016 - 10:52 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Include the 1890 model too!

Avatar
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6042
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
August 9, 2016 - 1:46 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

My 1892 built in 1915 has a bad case of it, maybe it was a bit ahead of it’s time.

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
NE OREGON
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 538
Member Since:
July 8, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11
August 9, 2016 - 2:23 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Thanks for the information. On a bit different note, I would like to know when Winchester stopped case coloring the lever, hammer, and butt plate. I read in Bob R’s book that the hammer went to blued verses case in mid/late 1913. Is it fair to assume that the lever and butt plate changed about the same time, and would it have changed on the 1892’s around then also? Thanks, Eagle

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12362
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
12
August 9, 2016 - 5:51 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

The change from case colored levers, hammers, and butt plates on the Model 1892 and 1894 all took place at the same time, beginning in late 1913, and running through approximately early 1916.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
NE OREGON
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 538
Member Since:
July 8, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
13
August 11, 2016 - 2:14 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Thanks for the good info. I wrote it down this time. Eagle

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6042
Chuck: 5471
steve004: 4935
1873man: 4612
Big Larry: 2494
twobit: 2446
mrcvs: 2088
Maverick: 1860
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14257
Posts: 126336

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2005
Members: 9698
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation