Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
1894 short rifle
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 103
Member Since:
December 12, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
February 23, 2013 - 6:41 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I bought a 1894 rifle serial #127977. It has the octagon barrel and is in 32-40. I’m guessing the date at 1902 or so. My question is, the rifle is proof stamped on both the barrel and receiver and I thought proofs did not appear until around the 290,000 or so range. Any comments ideas?

Avatar
Moderator
Moderator
Forum Posts: 960
Member Since:
December 30, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
February 23, 2013 - 6:48 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

jschaal

I have found in the past when I looked up early guns with the WP they had repair and returns in the factory records. Circle P might be another story.

Also I guess it would have the slight chance of an early serial # and a late shipping date by several years. Checking the records would be a start. Email me some pics if you want.

Brad

Regards

Brad Dunbar

http://1895book.com/

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10850
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
February 23, 2013 - 8:04 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Serial number 127977 (late 1901) is several years too early for proof marks. In my on going researh survey, Model 1894 serial number 260389 is the highest serial number I have found without proof marks. The next highest serial number I have in the survey is 264188, and it has proof mark stamps. All other serial numbers that I have found above that point have proof marks on them. Serial number 264188 went through the PR in April of 1905.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 264
Member Since:
November 17, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
February 24, 2013 - 4:40 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

It was likely returned to the factory for rework, perhaps the short barrel? And proofed at that time. Post pictures of the muzzle crown and dovetail cuts please!

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2303
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
February 24, 2013 - 5:37 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Hello,

I would also ask that you post or send me photos of the barrel address and caliber stamp. These may be of a different style than was used when the rifle was originally manufactured if the barrel was switched.

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Online: dimrod, deerhunter
Guest(s) 216
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6387
TXGunNut: 5055
Chuck: 4600
1873man: 4323
steve004: 4261
Big Larry: 2348
twobit: 2303
mrcvs: 1727
TR: 1725
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12784
Posts: 111359

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1769
Members: 8871
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation