Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
1886 Saddle Ring Carbine 50 EXP Letter Not Available
Avatar
steve004
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5155
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
21
July 6, 2025 - 5:37 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

Anthony said
I know and realize that sometimes we can get to be a little finicky and picky, as my old late friend, Larry, would accuse me of that often! Yet he would buy a lot of different stuff, to throw on his table at the local show, and complain, nothing was moving, cause the interest wasn’t there anymore. Not to get off track here or start an argument, as I could do very easily, as I like to view both sides! Buy or collect what you want, is my point!

Heck, “I wouldn’t throw her outa bed for eatin cookies”, neither! 

I would be happy to own this piece with the letter, and the extra barrel! 

Conundrum? , yeah! We could categorize this one in more than one way, and it’s good to see members stating they’re view points, as I’d like to hear more of this as a matter of fact! IMHO!

Heck! Like Waylon used to say, “I’ve Always Been Crazy”, as many of my friends can attest too! Smile

Just my two Cents Worth!

Anthony

Tony: no matter how many cookie crumbs she left in the bed?  I’m just saying there’s a limit to anything Wink

But in all seriousness, I do agree with Tony and I would be happy with the rifle as it is.  I’d be happier with a .33 WCF front end added.  I’d also be happy with the rifle and no letter.  It’s a bit of an irony as this rifle was made as a .50 Express and as it sits, it is a .50 express.  All the internals that were specific to an original .50 express are present with this rifle.  I’d much rather have a takedown M1886 in .50 express than in .33WCF (and many here know how fond I am of the .33 WCF).  

A final thought.  It can’t be proven that the original .50 express barrel didn’t make its way back to this rifle.  I’ve seen a few improbable examples where an original part has been reunited with a rifle.
 

 

  

Avatar
Anthony
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 983
Member Since:
December 9, 2002
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
22
July 6, 2025 - 9:20 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I’m in agreement with you Steve! 

Like Ole’ Clint said, “A Man has to Know His Limitations”!!  LOL!!! LaughLaughLaugh

 

 

Anthony

Avatar
steve004
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5155
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
23
July 6, 2025 - 9:21 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Henry Mero said
Y a’, We got to talking about two different firearms here. On the rifle , I think the letter is “wonky” , as I’ve seen several similar in the past and owned a few and would love to own any of them . I have one coming that letters with a “burl maple” stock but some of the other features on the gun are not mentioned, so I’m waiting to get it “in hand” to determine bad gun or bad letter. 

  

Henry – 

I don’t think the wonky letter factor can be ruled out until the ledger can be further examined.  I have sympathy for those interpreting the ledgers as many times they are very crowded and at least to me, look difficult to interpret.  Just yesterday I was looking at a M1873 that had two museum letters with it.  One was a good bit older than the other one.  The older letter noted the presence of a set trigger; the newer letter did not mention a set trigger (and the rifle did have a set trigger).  

Avatar
Anthony
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 983
Member Since:
December 9, 2002
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
24
July 6, 2025 - 9:28 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I’m familiar with that same 73 Steve, and am wondering myself about that! 

Conundrum’s, All Around! Laugh

I would have a hard time with those ledgers myself, and am constantly grateful, to the ones who have helped, sort out many of the mysteries, hidden in those ledgers! I tip my hat every chance I get to the ones doing the great surveys that help us all here! Smile

 

Anthony

Avatar
oldcrankyyankee
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 918
Member Since:
February 17, 2022
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
25
July 6, 2025 - 10:57 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

I have to agree with Bert’s take on this gun, He just put into much better words. I also believe it has fallen into deviant hands, as Ian pointed out, and that is where I stand at this time, like it or not.

I would still like to see it in hand to examine it. I think the tell all will be the factory address on the barrel and the stampings on the stock and lower tang.   

Avatar
steve004
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5155
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
26
July 6, 2025 - 11:16 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

oldcrankyyankee said
I have to agree with Bert’s take on this gun, He just put into much better words. I also believe it has fallen into deviant hands, as Ian pointed out, and that is where I stand at this time, like it or not.

I would still like to see it in hand to examine it. I think the tell all will be the factory address on the barrel and the stampings on the stock and lower tang.   

  

Tom – yes it would be very helpful to give the rifle a very careful examination (with buttstock and forearm off), check the barrel address and all markings on the metal and just see if it all, “adds up.”  

Avatar
oldcrankyyankee
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 918
Member Since:
February 17, 2022
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
27
July 6, 2025 - 11:20 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

steve004 said

oldcrankyyankee said

I have to agree with Bert’s take on this gun, He just put into much better words. I also believe it has fallen into deviant hands, as Ian pointed out, and that is where I stand at this time, like it or not.

I would still like to see it in hand to examine it. I think the tell all will be the factory address on the barrel and the stampings on the stock and lower tang.   

  

Tom – yes it would be very helpful to give the rifle a very careful examination (with buttstock and forearm off), check the barrel address and all markings on the metal and just see if it all, “adds up.”  

  

Steve, of all the things I am inept to, and I know I have asked your thoughts on many guns, and I hope your wisdom has paid off. I just don’t see the math on this one.

Avatar
cobra2858
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6
Member Since:
June 28, 2025
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
28
July 7, 2025 - 2:06 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I appreciate all the responses and it appears I will have to take the buttstock and forearm off for a better look. I also have ammunition coming to see if it cycles through both rifles. Sorry to put both rifles on the same post. I’ll hopefully find some marking. Thanks

Avatar
mrcvs
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2189
Member Since:
September 22, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
29
July 7, 2025 - 1:40 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

cobra2858 said
I also have this 1886 50 EXP with a letter. It seems it went back to the factory for a smaller caliber, and the 50 Exp barrel subsequently put back on. I am posting pics for any thoughts. Thanks BillIMG_7181.jpgImage EnlargerIMG_7176.jpgImage EnlargerIMG_7196.jpgImage EnlargerIMG_7192.jpgImage EnlargerIMG_7188.jpgImage EnlargerIMG_7186.jpgImage Enlarger

  

So as not to confuse with the original subject matter of this thread…I am replying to this specific post as it relates to this Model 1886 rifle.

I created this thread specifically because of this rifle:

https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/whats-the-latest-return-or-return-repair-date-you-have-seen-on-a-factory-letter/

The reason being that if it was such that the records for R & R existed to not long after 1905, it makes it somewhat more likely that this was returned to .50 Express at the factory a few or several years subsequent to 1905, when the intents were as to function and not deviant for financial gain.  If the R & R records existed well into the teens, like it appears they do—although we have not established a specific latest possible R & R date for the Model 1886–it becomes increasingly unlikely that the work was factory.  By the 1920s, the Model 1886 was only chambered in .45-70 and .33 Winchester, and reconfiguring to .50 Express would be impractical and defy logic.

Thus, I think having a fifteen, or even ten, year window during this key time frame in which records existed and there is no R & R information for makes it unlikely this reconversion was factory work.

i should ask, how long have you owned this rifle?

And the bigger question is when was this done, and how did that come about?  It would have taken an expert to even think to look, and realise, that this rifle, although chambered in .33 Winchester, was tooled such that it was .50 Express.  More likely, I’m guessing, someone lettered their .33 Winchester and realized they hit pay dirt when it lettered as .50 Express.  The hard part would have been finding an orphan .50 Express barrel to place on this rifle.  Apparently, this was accomplished.  Either an original or modified to appear original.

Is there the possibility, in the interest of scholarship, you could disassemble the forearm from this rifle and post photographs of the underside of the barrel and markings, if any?

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12839
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
30
July 7, 2025 - 5:09 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

Ian,

The latest dated “R&R” entry I have found (verified) thus for a Model 1886 is March 1919.  Based on the second factory letter below, it appears that the records were still in the warehouse as late as December 1921.

CFM-research-sheet-154456-33-WCF.jpgImage Enlarger CFM-factory-letter-156081-A.jpgImage Enlarger

 

 

 

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
mrcvs
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2189
Member Since:
September 22, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
31
July 8, 2025 - 12:34 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Bert H. said
Ian,

The latest dated “R&R” entry I have found (verified) thus for a Model 1886 is March 1919.  Based on the second factory letter below, it appears that the records were still in the warehouse as late as December 1921.

CFM-research-sheet-154456-33-WCF.jpgImage Enlarger CFM-factory-letter-156081-A.jpgImage Enlarger

 

 

 

Bert

  

I think that records for this being available for the 1886 as late as 1921 makes it unlikely that this was reverted back to .50 Express at the factory.  Not to say it didn’t happen after 1921, but unlikely.

Avatar
Anthony
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 983
Member Since:
December 9, 2002
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
32
July 8, 2025 - 1:00 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

mrcvs said

Bert H. said

Ian,

The latest dated “R&R” entry I have found (verified) thus for a Model 1886 is March 1919.  Based on the second factory letter below, it appears that the records were still in the warehouse as late as December 1921.

CFM-research-sheet-154456-33-WCF.jpgImage Enlarger CFM-factory-letter-156081-A.jpgImage Enlarger

 

 

 

Bert

  

I think that records for this being available for the 1886 as late as 1921 makes it unlikely that this was reverted back to .50 Express at the factory.  Not to say it didn’t happen after 1921, but unlikely.

  

I’m in agreement with you on this! Smile

Anthony

Avatar
cobra2858
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6
Member Since:
June 28, 2025
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
33
July 8, 2025 - 8:05 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I bought these rifles from an old timer that owned them many years. I believe he bought them from a reputable dealer in Pennsylvania. I have other paperwork i have to go through. Some hand written notes. I will at some point remove the stock and forearm and look for markings. Thanks for all the input. 

Avatar
steve004
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5155
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
34
July 8, 2025 - 11:22 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

There’s much in life we can’t have 100% certainty about.  I often strive for it but realize it’s rarely attainable.  I would enjoy and be proud to own either of these rifles (ideally both) Smile

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: Bert H., Chuck, Anthony, [email protected], NE Herd Bull, MidwestCrisis
Guest(s) 194
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6395
Chuck: 5798
steve004: 5155
1873man: 4691
deerhunter: 2692
Big Larry: 2546
twobit: 2491
mrcvs: 2189
Maverick: 2023
Newest Members:
DGABELAM
Bkmkok
Leonardb
Skysquatch82
cdavis5705
jj95
DWill01
Joe Bang
pew pew
Longrangesniper
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14687
Posts: 131403

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 9966
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation