Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
1885 Low Wall - rebarreled or not
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Zack
Guest
WACA Guest
1
February 7, 2016 - 5:47 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Hi all,

I’m a visitor in this forum, and relatively uninitiated with the original appearance and details of Winchester single shots. A couple of days back I encountered a 1885 Low Wall that puzzles me a bit, and I decided to give it a try to ask You guys about barrel markings – or the lack of them in this case.

The rifle is chambered for .25-20 Single Shot. The appearance of the octaconal barrel suggests that this rifle would have been rebarreled; the barrel has a fairly shiny and fresh looking bluing and there are no stamps whatsoever on the barrel itself. The action is not too bad either, but I would say that somehow the condition of the action and the barrel doesn’t match.

Obviously I would assume that the barrel is new, but the only thing that bothers me is that why on earth would someone rebarrel a Low Wall for such an obsolete cartridge instead of, for example, a .25-20 WCF.

I reckon it is also possible that there has been severe pitting on the barrel, and the faults (plus the stamps) have been ground or polished away… ? (On the other hand, the octacon edges are not rounded at all, which would suggest against polishing – or that the job has been done properly.)

Unfortunately, I only saw the rifle very shortly a couple of days ago, and I do not have its serial # or other details available right now.

I’ll have the rifle in my hands again in a week or two. So, in the meantime I’ll ask You is the any way to tell, whether the barrel is original (with a cleaning/rebluing job done on the outside) or a completely new one with just an obsolete chamber? 

… or, have you ever heard of original Low Wall barrels with totally devoid of stamps/markings?

Regards,

Zack

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12488
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
February 8, 2016 - 1:23 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Zack,

The lack of any markings on the barrel is a strong clue that it is not factory original. Beyond that, there is not much to say until you can get the serial number.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
New Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 2
Member Since:
February 8, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
February 8, 2016 - 6:29 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Thanks Bert! In the meantime I also got registered to your website. You’ve got great information here!

Yes, I think too that the barrel is not original, but since I know so little about these guns I decided to start asking.

Today the current owner kindly dug the gun out from his vault and phoned me the serial number and the barrel length; the serial is 102311, and the barrel is 24″.

As said, I’m only learning, and when doing that I browsed your forum further. Did I get it right that with a serial# it would be possible to receive some records from the Winchester factory ledgers free of charge? If so, is it this ‘Cody Record Office’, whom I should contact?

I also have a Low Wall action in my workshop. Its serial number is 47366. It would be great to learn more about that one too, in case of possible restoration later on.

Regards,

Zack

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12488
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
February 8, 2016 - 9:03 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Zack,

To get a research worksheet from the Cody Firearms Museum records office, you need to be a member. Anyone can purchase a Factory letter, but members get a substantial discount after using their option for a free letter.

As it turns out, a few years ago I completed a 100% survey of the existing Model 1885 ledger records and recorded the caliber for each serial number as it was received and shipped. Serial number 102311 was shipped with a 28″ barrel in the 25-20 S.S. cartridge. More than likely the barrel was cut down (shortened), and then buffed, polished, and refinished.

Serial number 47366 was also a 25-20 S.S.

Of the (91) total different cartridges that Winchester chambered the Model 1885 Single Shot rifle for, the list below shows the production numbers for the top (17) cartridges.

Cartridge/Caliber Qty. 
22 Short – 16,449 
32 WCF – 12,640 
32-40 – 11,174 
22 Long – 8,936 
22 WCF – 8,145 
38-55 – 7,596 
25 WCF/25-20 S.S. – 7,555 
22 Long R. – 4,125 
32 Short (RF) – 3,903 
44 WCF – 3,875 
32 Long (RF) – 3,263 
45-70 – 3,032 
38 WCF – 2,789 
40-82 WCF – 1,703 
40-60 WCF – 1,512 
40-70 Sharps ST – 1,428 
30 U.S./30 Army – 1,067 
45-90 WCF – 945 
Total – 100,137 

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 378
Member Since:
July 7, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
February 8, 2016 - 9:43 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bert

What about 45-60 and 45-75. Not on this actual subject but, I just came across about 120 s/n’s that may have gone to Hawaii, including 6 muskets in 45-75. I will put this together and send it to you. 71638, 71635, 71651, 71896, 71667 & 71634 are the 6 muskets.

Paul

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12488
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
February 8, 2016 - 10:07 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Paul,

45-60 WCF = 193

45-75 WCF = 110

I have all six of the serial numbers you mention, with the five lowest numbers all being in the same work order. That stated, they are all 45-70s versus 45-75.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
New Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 2
Member Since:
February 8, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
February 10, 2016 - 5:57 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bert,

Thank You so much for the information. I really appreciate your effort!

Even though this rifle is obviously a basic 1885 Low Wall, I’m interested in it for certain reasons. I will get the rifle to my hands in a week or two for a more careful inspection. I will get back to You guys if something comes up with it.

With best regards,

Zack

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: 426crown, Anthony, rwsem, freebird1968
Guest(s) 114
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6103
Chuck: 5556
steve004: 4983
1873man: 4636
Big Larry: 2500
twobit: 2469
mrcvs: 2107
Maverick: 1898
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14342
Posts: 127439

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2012
Members: 9738
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation