Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
1885 barrels update
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 48
Member Since:
May 8, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
November 19, 2016 - 4:42 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Thought I’d add a little to my post from a few days ago.

Meister Bullets makes a product called the “Slug Your Barrel Kit”, which I think is excellent.     Anyway, I slugged the barrel on the 1885 High Wall I mentioned in the previous post, and the slug mic’d right at .312″.      The slug was pretty tight for the first 12″ or so, after which it got a little easier for the remainder of the barrel to the chamber.     The bore is shiny and the rifling is still well defined and pretty sharp, although some pitting is present.

I had a box of Black Hills  115gr FPL on hand, so off to the range I went.     I started at 25yds, and got down to a 5-shot group in a little over 1″ center-to-center.     At 50yds the best I did was a 5-shot group in 2  1/2″.     I thought that wasn’t too bad for 127 year old bore, original open sights, and 69 year old eyes.     I hope to do better with a tang sight and a powder/bullet combination my particular rifle likes.

I think Bert was correct,   Winchester made some pretty good shooting guns.

Thanks for all the great responses I’ve gotten to my various posts.

Avatar
New Mexico
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 1167
Member Since:
December 1, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
November 19, 2016 - 4:11 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

mustang said
Thought I’d add a little to my post from a few days ago.   

   The slug was pretty tight for the first 12″ or so, after which it got a little easier for the remainder of the barrel to the chamber.    

I have an assortment of pure lead balls in different diameters I use for slugging barrels.  I always find that the first 6″ or so are tighter than the remainder of the barrel.  Have always attributed that to the ball being shaped and once it is shaped and grabs the bore grooves it is easier to push down the rest of the barrel.  Don’t know if that is a correct assumption but would like to hear what others think about this.

1876-4-1.jpg

"This is the West, sir. When the legend becomes fact, print the legend." 

Avatar
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6133
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
November 19, 2016 - 10:20 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Seems the first few inches always feels a little tighter, I generally use OO Buck for .308 bores, sometimes even .32 bores. If I suspect a constriction I’ll push one from breech to muzzle. 

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: Maverick, deerhunter, btbell, Pwog
Guest(s) 111
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6133
Chuck: 5588
steve004: 5015
1873man: 4652
Big Larry: 2501
twobit: 2471
mrcvs: 2120
Maverick: 1919
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14389
Posts: 127900

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2017
Members: 9758
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation