Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
1873 from 1888 in 22 Short
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 107
Member Since:
December 26, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
June 13, 2024 - 6:42 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I bought this one today. It was built in 1888 by the date given by the site.  I have known about it for 35 years.  Approximately how many were made in 22 Short and when did the start building them.  My second question is just how old are the sights.  Could the front sight be original?  The Tang Sight seems to be more recent then the gun.  The only marking is the Pat. Jan 29 79. 

Image Enlarger

 

Image Enlarger

 

Image Enlarger

 

Image Enlarger

Image Enlarger

Image Enlarger

Image Enlarger

Image Enlarger

Image Enlarger

Image Enlarger

THIS ALL STARTED WITH JUST ONE GUN!

IMG_4414-Copy.JPG

 

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1946
Member Since:
September 22, 2011
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
2
June 13, 2024 - 12:21 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Mike,

Nice rifle!  I believe your front sight is original.  It’s identical to that on my 1905 production Model 1894.  This sight is original as well, both look odd because they are missing ivory inserts.

Photographs of this sight:

IMG_2961.jpegImage EnlargerIMG_2962.jpegImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 390
Member Since:
July 31, 2005
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
3
June 13, 2024 - 2:01 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

mrcvs said
Mike,

Nice rifle!  I believe your front sight is original.  It’s identical to that on my 1905 production Model 1894.  This sight is original as well, both look odd because they are missing ivory inserts.

Photographs of this sight:

IMG_2961.jpegImage EnlargerIMG_2962.jpegImage Enlarger

  

I agree with MrCVS, I believe the sights are original.  Both the Lyman #1 (second variation) and #3 ivory bead front sight were listed in Winchester’s November 1887 catalog.  Many of the #3 sights I see on rifles are missing the ivory bead.  Here is a photo of one in my collection that still has the ivory bead.

Bill

Number3-02.jpgImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

I call myself a collector as it sounds better than hoarder

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 390
Member Since:
July 31, 2005
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
4
June 13, 2024 - 2:14 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bill Hockett said

mrcvs said

Mike,

Nice rifle!  I believe your front sight is original.  It’s identical to that on my 1905 production Model 1894.  This sight is original as well, both look odd because they are missing ivory inserts.

Photographs of this sight:

IMG_2961.jpegImage EnlargerIMG_2962.jpegImage Enlarger

  

I agree with MrCVS, I think it highly probable the sights are original.  Do you have a factory letter? 

Both the Lyman #1 (second variation) and #3 ivory bead front sight were listed in Winchester’s November 1887 catalog.  Many of the #3 sights I see on rifles are missing the ivory bead.  Here is a photo of one in my collection that still has the ivory bead.

Bill

Number3-02.jpgImage Enlarger

  

I call myself a collector as it sounds better than hoarder

Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4464
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
5
June 13, 2024 - 8:46 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

The first 11 prototype 22’s where made in 1883 and then shortly later that year they started production. George Madis states in his book that around 19,500 22 were produced. The 22 short was the most common 22 caliber. In my survey I have 2255 in 22 short, 297 in 22 long and 7 in 22 extra long.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 216
Member Since:
December 9, 2002
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
June 14, 2024 - 1:30 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bob,

I always wondered about George’s assumption, as I’m guessing he assumed this number of 19,500, based on all his information as similar to other survey assumptions, mixed with his knowledge of what was available to him back then, when he was doing his own survey on many of the Winchester models, many of us are familiar with. This is no way a knock on George in any way on my part as we all have learned a lot from his work and have benefited as in many ways George Madis can be credited with starting many Surveys that are being corrected today and improved upon, through valuable time put forth by many of the current members and proven research. Smile

Anthony

Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4464
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
7
June 14, 2024 - 3:20 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Anthony,

George did the best with the tools he had to work with. He didn’t have computers where you enter all the information and then ask compile it. The only way to do the research on production numbers without making assumptions is to do a complete ledger survey.  My guess someday they will compile the 73 ledgers to a database and it will be AI that will read and interpret the hand written ledgers.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 216
Member Since:
December 9, 2002
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
June 14, 2024 - 12:43 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bob,

I couldn’t agree with you more as I’m not trying to discredit any of George’s time consuming work and with a phone call he helped us all out immensely.

Sometimes I’m not thorough in my explanations for fear I can drag out my conversation’s.

Your exactly right with the use of Today’s computers and the technology available to us that George didn’t have. I tip my hat to him as many do as I feel he was one of the fore fathers to doing some survey work as many here have taken that to another level. Smile

 

Anthony

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 915
Member Since:
September 28, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
June 14, 2024 - 11:35 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

1873man said
The first 11 prototype 22’s where made in 1883 and then shortly later that year they started production. George Madis states in his book that around 19,500 22 were produced. The 22 short was the most common 22 caliber. In my survey I have 2255 in 22 short, 297 in 22 long and 7 in 22 extra long.

Bob

  

Bob,

Have you ever come across one in the ledgers chambered in 22 WRF?

Erin

Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4464
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
10
June 14, 2024 - 11:46 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Erin,

Never saw 22 WRF in the ledgers just what has been said in books. 

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7118
TXGunNut: 5577
Chuck: 4999
steve004: 4666
1873man: 4464
Big Larry: 2447
twobit: 2349
mrcvs: 1946
TR: 1784
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 13468
Posts: 118889

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1895
Members: 9271
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation