Please consider registering
Forum Scope


Forum Options

Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Register Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
my Model 97 Trench Guin
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Steve McCrory
October 20, 2018 - 4:03 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Hello to all, I am new to this forum.. I have in my possession a mod 97 Trench Gun and matching bayonet.

This weapon appears to have been a personal weapon of perhaps a non com Marine ( believing Marine as they were the Expeditionary force of WW1) or Army. It has a bit of carving to accentuate the grip, really just a line sweeping upwards from the ball end towards the back of the receiver.

It has all the correct markings… Has the US stamp and the Flaming Bomb clearly marked at the back of the barrel in front of the receiver, also same markings on the ejection side of the receiver… This also has the correct 6 hole heat shroud, bayonet grip and a M1907 sling…With about 80% brown left on this gun it is also very tight, been cared for with love as it feels like a newer 1920’s 97 goose gun I have….

What is unique are the serial numbers, seems as if these 97’s destined for the military during WW1 had serial numbers from 600,000 to 690,000…give or take..

My weapon has serial numbers in the low 500,000’s… Like 504….Dating this 97 to 1912 pre WW1… The gun has a cartouche stamped into the left side of the stock, basically all of the right markings to make it a legit WW1 piece… 

There is only one marking that doesn’t fit… the barrel is stamped FULL… My belief is that this weapon was part of a Military test bed for the trench gun series and the Military commissioned Winchester to build some 500k of this weapon to test for worthiness in battle. Therefore contracted Winchester and then W chose to use their excess FULL choke long barrels and resized them to make this initial series…  Basically making it an open choke… If the Germans found you in possession of one these during capture… you were immediately executed… at least that is the lore spread to this day.

If any one has info to support or refute my thoughts , please feel free to contact me or post your thoughts.

Thank you for  your interest.

Steve McCrory

Kingston, WA
Forum Posts: 12717
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
October 20, 2018 - 6:19 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost


To start this off, your Winchester should be a Model “1897” versus a “97”.  If it is marked “97” on either the barrel or the slide bar, it is a piece parts (put together) gun, and not original.

Model 1897 serial numbers 504000 – 504999 were manufactured in September & October of 1910 versus in 1912. The serial number on your gun immediately makes it suspect, as does the “FULL” marked barrel.  What (if anything) is marked on the bayonet adapter?

Your statement “the Military commissioned Winchester to build some 500k of this weapon to test for worthiness in battle.” is definitely not accurate. 

Is your Winchester a solid frame, or a Take down?

While Winchester did infrequently use standard length barrels (Full choke marked) to make up a small number of Trench and Riot Guns, they overmarked the “FULL” stamp, and marked “CYL” right above it.

Can you post (or send me) clear pictures of the gun?


WACA 6571L, Historian & Board of Director Member

WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1764
Member Since:
December 31, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
October 20, 2018 - 9:40 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Wow, and it also has a cartouche No WW1 Winchester Trenchguns were ever cartouched. Sounds like, parts is parts, as so many are. Big Larry

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 628
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 63
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
1873man: 5177
clarence: 4304
TXGunNut: 3888
Chuck: 3507
steve004: 3095
twobit: 2843
Maverick: 2015
JWA: 1823
Big Larry: 1764
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 16
Topics: 10399
Posts: 89645


Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1431
Members: 11499
Moderators: 3
Admins: 3