Any of you guys shot any whitetails with the .44/40 factory load? I recently picked up a 1913 model 1892 sporting rifle in .44WCF and would like to try it out for woods hunting. The paper ballistics seem pretty anemic but I have read a few accounts of good results on deer at woods ranges. Several instances of complete penetration on broadside hits with the 200 flat nose factory load. Anyone tried theirs out on deer close up?
My first and second deer were taken with a 24″ M1892 in 44-40. The first was on it’s way down when I shot the other that was with it. Both clean kills. I was using 200 gr. lead slugs with a too hot load of 2400. Real hard on the rifle, but I know better now. I use H110 rather sparingly now as not to ruin a nice $4,000 M1892. As for accuracy, the H110 is super accurate as is the 2400, but I no longer deer hunt, so when I do shoot one of my 4 M1892’s I do it with very low power ammo. Pistol power only. Very good 100 yard deer cartridge. Big Larry
I’ve taken two nice Whitetail does with the 44 W.C.F. The last one I took was with an original Winchester Model 1873 and a handload that put a soft cast 200 grain bullet out the barrel at 1,300 fps, depending upon the actual temperature. This velocity is similar to the original black powder loads used back in the day. I have not chronographed factory loads, so I cannot compare with them. I shot the doe broadside at about 40 yards. The bullet passed right through the deer and it ran about 6 seconds, then keeled over. Here is a photo …
The wound in the photo above is the exit wound.
I also shot a nice, 200 pound Whitetail doe a few years earlier using an original Winchester Model 53, but the load was a bit closer to the original H.V. factory loads, though not quite. If I recall correctly, the 200 grain soft cast bullet left the barrel at around 1,450 fps. The doe was facing me and just as I pulled the trigger it wheeled sideways to flee, moving its body out of the line of fire, but putting its foreleg and rear leg in the line instead. The bullet went through the upper bone in the foreleg and the femur in the back leg, shattering both. Of course, this necessitated a follow up shot which went in the front of the head, through the brain, down the neck breaking a few vertebrae, completely through the vitals and lodging in the gut. I did not measure total penetration, but would estimate it as around 25″. Here is a photo of that doe after it was gutted …
I havent shot anything with a 44 WCF but have killed several pigs and a turkey with my 1892 rifle in 38 WCF with great success. Some of them old pigs are tougher than deer, at least the deer we have in our part of the country.
I used 18.3grns of IMR 4227 with 180 grn lead bullets. I dont know how fast its moving but I once shot some of these loads in an 1873 and it made me a little nervous. The maximum loads are 26 grns IMR 4227 with a 180 grn jacketed bullet. The suggested load with 180 grn jacketed bullet is 20 grns having a velocity of 1650 ft/second.
I didnt mark it but here is a target that Im pretty sure was shot at 100 yards.
1892takedown @sbcglobal.net ......NRA Endowment Life Member.....WACA Member
"God is great.....beer is good.....and people are crazy"... Billy Currington
I have shot many boxes of factory Win 44 at target in 92’s and 73’s and they are accurate but extremely weak. I suspect they are downloaded to the point of being safe in even weak handguns to avoid modern Liability concerns. I know they also have a rainbow trajectory that wouldnt be an issue with 50 -75 yd shooting , but if I was hunting with a 92 I would handload something abit stronger
Phil
I just checked a Winchester catalogue and it says the current factory 44-40 offering is a 200 grain bullet at 1,190 fps. This is significantly weaker than the original black powder rounds. The lawyers have almost neutered this cartridge. I find 1,300 fps works just fine on deer but I’d be a bit nervous about 1,190 fps.
Five Blacktails that I can remember without going to my notes have been taken with a .38 WCF 1873 with factory loads (before I began reloading for it.) All but one were neck shots. The one chest-shot buck was nearly broadside, moving toward high gear, out about 50 yards distant. He fell less than 20 yards after the shot. Be close. Pick your spot well. Hit your spot. Take good care of the meat!
That was back in the 70’s. My Great-grandfather’s rifle. Things were different back then–farther apart. Minutes to hunting and shooting. That factory load is also good for pheasant and ducks on the wing.–Good that things were farther apart; (shooting rifles at flying gamebirds–not the smartest method.)
They were the regular/weaker loads. No HVs out of Great-grandpa’s ’73. Winchester Western and Remington .38-40’s I believe. If you want to know for certain, I can descend into the sacred realm of my basement reloading room and check the cases–always a pleasure to enter that door!
My youngest son killed his first two deer (mule deer) with the ’73 and reloads. Oregon Trail Laser-Cast bullets. These were the first bullets we tried reloading. They shot so straight, we stopped before experimenting with other slugs. It might be better to use an expanding/softer slug for hunting, but the two bucks he shot didn’t need more expansion. Range on both was under 50 yards. Shoulder shot buck dropped where it stood. Second buck behind the shoulder went about 40 yards. We are careful to keep pressures down for the ’73. No chronograph–manual data lists our velocity below 1000fps. If we were shooting an 1892, we would push the bullet faster.
I have old Dominion boxes , but could only locate a 20 box of 44-40 200 gr SP from the 60’s when they were starting to download them (they also came in 50 packs)
The top flap reads “For use in Rifles” (doesnt mention do not use in hand guns, but I wouldnt in your BP frame Colt Peacemaker )
Back of the box Ballistics reads MV 1310 fps. , ME 760 fp. Sight in @100 yd = apprx 3 ” high @ 50 yd ,and 4 1/2 ” low @ 125 yd
( Mike Webb …What do your Dominion Ballistics read ? )
Unfortunately the weaker factory Win loads will not give you this wondrous power and super flat trajectory, but as previous posted, short range and precise bullet placement will still put meat on the table for the skilled hunter
Phil

I apologize for stirring up another old topic but I really enjoy searching for 44-40 topics/information. I’d love to hear details of ya’lls deer hunt with the old cartridge and add your stories to the 44 Winchester Center Fire Cartridge web site. This past season I took home a small 8 point from 55-65 yards with a Hornady 240gr SWC-HP using Reloder 7. Rife is a scoped Marlin 1894CB chambered for 44-40. The details can be found at .44winchestercenterfirecartridges.com
A little food for thought…
Looking at Lyman’s reloading manual #49 page 299, (Double check my numbers) Lyman lists several powders and charges for the 44-40. In particular, Lyman lists 2400 powder in use with the Speer 200gr JSHP bullet #4425. Lyman uses a 24″ Universal receiver with 1:36″ twist for these particular tests. Cases trimmed to 1.295 and an AOL of 1.600. Those measurements (plus some misc measurements) with Starline brass, using QuickLoad…gives a bullet seating depth of .313″ as well as the pressures noted.
Lyman Manual….vs…QL (Quickload) Data
grains/powder/velocity/cup/QL psi CIP
Group I Rifles (weak actions)(Lyman lists ten rifles)…..Thats nineteen different firearms total chambered for the 44-40
16gr/2400/1,183fps/11,900/15,000 (fps=Current Factory Velocities) Normal Loads
Group II Rifles (strong actions)(Lyman lists nine rifles)…..Thats nineteen different firearms total chambered for the 44-40
18gr/2400/1,380fps/14,500/19,000 (fps=Original Historical Velocities) +P Loads due to higher than max pressures
20gr/2400/1,638fps/19,000/25,753 (fps=1903 (1910) Factory “High Velocity” Replication) +P+ Loads due to excessive high pressure
Lyman also lists Unique and IMR4227 powders for Group II Rifles
Personally I will not shoot anything in my Marlin with CIP estimated pressures over 26,000psi CIP, we all have our limitations right?. My goal was to replicate the 1903, more yet…the 1910 “High Velocity” ballistics….not to try and make the 44-40 into a 44 magnum as so I have been accused. I consider these HV loads as 44-40 “+P+” loads for those that like to use the “+P” status.
Reputable writers have been using and publishing the +P type loads that replicate original 1,300fps velocities ( but higher than black powder pressures) in magazines and online articles for years.
For all the nay sayers, dudes, weekend range worriers and city slickers…..the loads are right there in the reloading manual!!
Not in Lymans #49 but is in #47 is the 240gr lead bullet information and Reloder 7 that produce 1,200fps at “Group I” rifle category pressures. The same info is/was listed on Lee’s 44-40 reloading 3-die-set pamphlet.
Although the modern 1,300 fps velocities replicate original velocities using both black powder and early smokeless powder, the modern pressures generated are above SAAMI/CIP max pressures. I call modern 1,300fps velocities +P loads because of the higher than standard pressures of the earlier black powder and smokeless powder ballistics. The 1,400fps-1,600fps step in velocities I call +P+ loads.
CIP vs SAAMI
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_arms_ammunition_pressure_testing
Thank You!
November 7, 2015

It may be useful to note that the 1873 is on Lyman’s Group 1 list and the 1892 is in Group 2. Since I own both 1873’s and 1892’s I’ll load for the 1873. 8 grains of Unique (Group 1) should do anything the 44WCF (and 38WCF) is meant to do. I won’t risk a brain fart so I see no need for “Group 2” loads.
One of my favorite posts by John Kort
44-40 High Velocity Replication Loads of yesteryear
Beginning back in 1903, and for about the next 40 years, higher velocity .44-40 cartridges were offered for both the ’94 Marlin and ’92 Winchester. Catalog velocity was almost 1,600 f.p.s. with a 200 gr. jacketed bullet. Pressure was reported to be around 22,000 p.s.i. and therefore were not safe to be used in the ’73 Winchester.
Lately, I have been working with my ’94 Marlin Cowboy Ltd. (24″) replicating those vintage factory offerings. As I recall. 44-40 Willy had done some of this in the past.
The jacketed bullets I have used have been 1.)R-P 200 gr. .427″, 2.)Winchester 200 gr. .426″ 3.) Speer 200 gr. .429″
The groove diameter in my rifle is .428″ and all of the bullets shot well even though both the R-P and Winchester were smaller than the groove diamater. Surprisingly, the smallest group was fired with the Winchester bullet that was .002″ under groove diameter.Using R-P cases, here are the loads I have tried:
xx / 2400 / 1,670 f.p.s.
xx / 4759 / 1,619 f.p.s. (Capacity load)
xx / H4227 / 1,610 f.p.s.
xx /XMP5744 / 1,630 f.p.s. (Capacity load)All of these loads shot groups in the 1 1/2″ range @ 50 yards.
The best group to date came with a slightly higher charge of H4227 under the Winchester bullet.
22 / H4227 /1,685 f.p.s. went into less than 1″ for 5 shots @ 50 yards….but the powder had to be positioned to the back of the case to get that result/I’ts been kind of neat stepping back in history and shooting these replication loads of days gone by.
w30wcf
I thought I would mention that Buffalo Bore now manufactures 44-40 ammunition that is within SAAMI max pressure. These loads are more powerful than Winchester’s Super-X hunting loads or MagTech’s hunting loads BUT remain at safe SAAMI pressures. Caution should always be taken NOT to use any ammo in any old gun, or even shoot a gun that is in poor condition.
I am not a vender, work for or receive any compensation for said information. Just another shooter that loves the old leverguns.
I figure there are a lot of Winchester 92 and 94 owners that would like this information as well as the Henry, 66 and 73 replicas.
This is at topic near and “deer” to my heart. I have killed many deer and antelope with 44 and 38 1892s. Current factory stuff is pretty wimpy. I did kill an antelope with black hills factory 44/40 factory lead. Bullet went in and out of the chest cavity on a broad side shot at 80 yards. It traveled about 100 yards before falling dead.
After that i loaded black powder useing fff swiss. Big difference. Better velocity and hit much harder. Killed 2 antelope and one whitetail with this ammo. All three were at just over 100 yards and fell within a few yards.
I now shoot handloads using horady xtp jacketed bullets. Have killed 4 deer and 6 antelope with these loads. They are very effective and accurate. They are loaded to moderate pressure still generate good velocity without having to worry about hurting a nice old 92. Pressure is low enough that brass lasts a long long time.
I suspect that dominion brass is seperating due to pressure rather than poor quality.
Oldgrayguns said
This is at topic near and “deer” to my heart. I have killed many deer and antelope with 44 and 38 1892s. Current factory stuff is pretty wimpy. I did kill an antelope with black hills factory 44/40 factory lead. Bullet went in and out of the chest cavity on a broad side shot at 80 yards. It traveled about 100 yards before falling dead.
After that i loaded black powder useing fff swiss. Big difference. Better velocity and hit much harder. Killed 2 antelope and one whitetail with this ammo. All three were at just over 100 yards and fell within a few yards.
I now shoot handloads using horady xtp jacketed bullets. Have killed 4 deer and 6 antelope with these loads. They are very effective and accurate. They are loaded to moderate pressure still generate good velocity without having to worry about hurting a nice old 92. Pressure is low enough that brass lasts a long long time.
I suspect that dominion brass is seperating due to pressure rather than poor quality.
Hello OGG,
Black Hills is the wimpy little brother of “factory” ammo. Their 44 WCF only travels at 800fps muzzle velocity, if I remember correctly, while both Remington and Winchester is in the 1190 fps range. Obviously a BIG difference! I would dump the Black Hills and get the other two if you are going to hunt with it. The point of impact and trajectory will also be quite different as a result of the change in velocity.
Do I have your 1892’s in my survey yet??? I would love to add them if not. https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-research-survey-discussion/winchester-model-1892-all-rifle-survey/
Michael
Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation
1 Guest(s)
