Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Correct U.S. marked Winder Musket
Avatar
Big Mac
Virginia
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 171
Member Since:
September 7, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
April 20, 2019 - 3:04 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Folks,

I am considering a U.S. marked Winder Musket in upcoming auction.  It is listed as .22 short, Lyman 53 sight, has ordnance bomb with US stamped behind hammer.  I can’t download photos and won’t be able to examine until day of the auction.  Any recommendations for reference material or what to look for to avoid fakery (correct markings, serial # range, dead-giveaways)?

Thanks

Mac

Avatar
clarence
NY
Member
Restricted
Forum Posts: 7119
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
April 20, 2019 - 6:00 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

So many were purchased by the US gov’t that it seems unlikely anyone would “fake” one by adding the Ordnance Dept. markings, if that’s what you’re concerned about; those sold commercially are probably scarcer, as are those chambered for LR.  Ser. no. range–130,000s. 

Avatar
Bill Hanzel
Ohio
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 405
Member Since:
May 26, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
April 20, 2019 - 8:10 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

image-1.jpgImage Enlargerimage-2.jpgImage Enlarger

It should be the Lyman 53 as picture and those are correct markings. There were only 11,419 martially marked that were ordered by winchester.as far as serial numbers range I am not sure. Hope this helps

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Avatar
Big Mac
Virginia
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 171
Member Since:
September 7, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
April 21, 2019 - 2:11 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Thanks gents.  I have minimal/no knowledge on 1885’s in general and Winder Muskets specifically.  I don’t know if they are subject to frequent fakery as are other Winchester rim fire models and was hoping to get some info to minimize risk if I decide to pursue this one.

Appreciate your responses, they were helpful.

Mac 

Avatar
clarence
NY
Member
Restricted
Forum Posts: 7119
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
April 21, 2019 - 2:22 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Big Mac said
I have minimal/no knowledge on 1885’s in general and Winder Muskets specifically.   

Main thing to know about Winders is that this 3rd model is the least desirable–they were rushed into production to exploit the military sales opportunity WWI provided, & were not manufactured to the same high standards as previous Winders. 

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12865
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
April 21, 2019 - 5:01 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

clarence said

Main thing to know about Winders is that this 3rd model is the least desirable–they were rushed into production to exploit the military sales opportunity WWI provided, & were not manufactured to the same high standards as previous Winders.   

That is quite frankly a large load of B.S.!  Where on earth did you come up with that bogus information?

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12865
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
April 21, 2019 - 5:14 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Big Mac said
Folks,

I am considering a U.S. marked Winder Musket in upcoming auction.  It is listed as .22 short, Lyman 53 sight, has ordnance bomb with US stamped behind hammer.  I can’t download photos and won’t be able to examine until day of the auction.  Any recommendations for reference material or what to look for to avoid fakery (correct markings, serial # range, dead-giveaways)?

Thanks

Mac  

Mac,

I wrote a detailed article about the Winder Muskets that was published in the Winter 2010 Collector magazine that discusses most of the details.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Big Mac
Virginia
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 171
Member Since:
September 7, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
April 21, 2019 - 12:15 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Bert H. said

Mac,

I wrote a detailed article about the Winder Muskets that was published in the Winter 2010 Collector magazine that discusses most of the details.

Bert  

Thanks Bert.  That’s what I needed.  Wish there were a way to print out these articles for note taking.

Mac

Avatar
clarence
NY
Member
Restricted
Forum Posts: 7119
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
April 21, 2019 - 3:11 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Bert H. said

That is quite frankly a large load of B.S.!  Where on earth did you come up with that bogus information?

Bert  

The action of the one I had was very noticeably “rougher” in operation than any other M. 85 I had ever owned.  Since this particular M. 87 was in near mint cond., I attributed its non-smoothness to the fact that it hadn’t been “broken in” as my others had (though a couple of them were also high cond. guns).  Years later I read Campbell’s discussion in Vol. 1 of how some of them, at least, had been assembled from spare parts after WWI, & guessed that mine had been one of those.  But I acknowledge that it’s a mistake to form a conclusion based on a single specimen of any model.

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12865
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
April 21, 2019 - 6:45 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Clarence,

I suspect that your Model 87 Winder Musket need a good internal cleaning. There were a few hundred of them that were assembled from remaining parts on hand (in the year 1922), none of which will have martial markings on them. I cannot attest to how well those last (parts clean-up) specimens were made. However, of the nearly 15,000 that were manufactured from January 1918 through June 1920, they were built to the same standards as all previous Model 1885s. The weak point on the Winder Muskets (all three variations) was the firing pin & extractor/ejector, but the same issue prevailed with all of the .22 rim fire Model 1885 rifles.

Of the three variations, the Ordnance marked 3rd variation Winders have that greatest interest (value) in the collector market. Personally, I would be willing to pay more for a 2nd variation (high-wall) Take Down in 22 Long Rifle in identical condition.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: Maverick, 450 Fuller
Guest(s) 163
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6408
Chuck: 5808
steve004: 5173
1873man: 4698
deerhunter: 2694
Big Larry: 2549
twobit: 2493
mrcvs: 2194
Maverick: 2029
Newest Members:
Model94-2025
R.E. Moore
sjGUESTEST
WindsurfAruba
cedar swamp savage
tradecraft
Weida78
Alby
Lambeau
Larsmack
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14714
Posts: 131625

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 9981
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation