Avatar
Please consider registering
Guest
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Register Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Antique Winchester 1892 rifle in .25 - 20 WCF with several special order features.
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1176
Member Since:
September 22, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
October 16, 2021 - 4:07 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost
sp_ReportPost

802F5905-C4FD-4F1D-BD25-AC82C162AD15.jpegImage Enlarger

356D6BBD-F2E1-4245-8C99-A1589DB66F7F.jpegImage Enlarger01D00F1B-0319-440D-84F7-87E3865EA1A4.jpegImage Enlarger

A great find!  My latest acquisition.  Manufactured in 1896.  The photographs display all features (pistol grip, checkered “I”style, rubber shotgun butt, round barrel with button magazine, folding Globe front sight, Lyman #6 rear sight, tang sight).  There still is great stuff out there!

DF646CF5-444E-412F-B7E6-84439678CC7F.jpegImage EnlargerFEABC8BA-E7B1-457F-A529-36EDC61A1353-1.jpegImage Enlarger

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1176
Member Since:
September 22, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
October 16, 2021 - 4:31 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost
sp_ReportPost

And the front & rear sights.  Thank you Clarence for properly identifying the Lyman #6 rear sight. 78854EAB-F449-494E-A053-B7AC27F82578.jpegImage Enlarger

7E8B1D24-7391-4747-9C97-A12073FACF11.jpegImage EnlargerC8D39355-A981-4AFE-9FF7-39553742399E.jpegImage EnlargerE4124FB9-72F8-4331-BF36-9A57BC3E9680.jpegImage Enlarger

The lack of any loss of bluing from the movement of a wedge suggests this rear sight is original to this rifle.

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12592
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
October 16, 2021 - 5:45 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost
sp_ReportPost

Ian,

The checkering pattern on your new (old) Model 1892 is the I-pattern, and it was the standard pattern used for plain (straight) grain stocks.

Bert

WACA 6571L, Historian & Board of Director Member
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1176
Member Since:
September 22, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
October 16, 2021 - 6:25 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost
sp_ReportPost

Bert H. said
The checkering pattern on your new (old) Model 1892 is the I-pattern, and it was the standard pattern used for plain (straight) grain stocks.

I corrected my original post to reflect this.  I posted straight from memory and I forgot my checkering patterns, although the pattern is obviously standard and the least extensive.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1267
Member Since:
July 8, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
October 16, 2021 - 7:14 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost
sp_ReportPost

mrcvs said
802F5905-C4FD-4F1D-BD25-AC82C162AD15.jpegImage Enlarger

356D6BBD-F2E1-4245-8C99-A1589DB66F7F.jpegImage Enlarger01D00F1B-0319-440D-84F7-87E3865EA1A4.jpegImage Enlarger

A great find!  My latest acquisition.  Manufactured in 1896.  The photographs display all features (pistol grip, checkered “I”style, rubber shotgun butt, round barrel with button magazine, folding Globe front sight, Lyman #6 rear sight, tang sight).  There still is great stuff out there!

DF646CF5-444E-412F-B7E6-84439678CC7F.jpegImage EnlargerFEABC8BA-E7B1-457F-A529-36EDC61A1353-1.jpegImage Enlarger  

Very nice rifle.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 421
Member Since:
April 1, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
October 16, 2021 - 8:08 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost
sp_ReportPost

mrcvs said
And the front & rear sights.  Thank you Clarence for properly identifying the Lyman #6 rear sight. 78854EAB-F449-494E-A053-B7AC27F82578.jpegImage Enlarger

7E8B1D24-7391-4747-9C97-A12073FACF11.jpegImage EnlargerC8D39355-A981-4AFE-9FF7-39553742399E.jpegImage EnlargerE4124FB9-72F8-4331-BF36-9A57BC3E9680.jpegImage Enlarger

The lack of any loss of bluing from the movement of a wedge suggests this rear sight is original to this rifle.  

I like that front sight – am curious if the records for this gun specifically note any of the sights – 92’s I have owned always seem to be silent on sights – example attached.

92ltr.JPGImage Enlarger92d1.JPGImage Enlarger92dlx.JPGImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1176
Member Since:
September 22, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
October 16, 2021 - 8:49 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost
sp_ReportPost

I don’t have a factory letter on it but it will be forthcoming in time.

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4178
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
8
October 17, 2021 - 12:51 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost
sp_ReportPost

Burt Humphrey said

I like that front sight

  

So do I, but it’s been driven in backwards–the ivory should face the shooter.  Lyman #5.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1176
Member Since:
September 22, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
October 17, 2021 - 1:31 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost
sp_ReportPost

clarence said

Burt Humphrey said

I like that front sight

  

So do I, but it’s been driven in backwards–the ivory should face the shooter.  Lyman #5.  

Wow, I didn’t know that front sight was the “sleeper” when it came to this rifle.  Yes, I was aware it was uncommon, but so too is a shotgun butt, pistol grip, checkering, button magazine, etc.

So, if it’s installed backwards, it should fold down forwards instead of backwards, if properly installed?

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4178
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
10
October 17, 2021 - 2:29 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost
sp_ReportPost

mrcvs said

Wow, I didn’t know that front sight was the “sleeper” when it came to this rifle.  Yes, I was aware it was uncommon, but so too is a shotgun butt, pistol grip, checkering, button magazine, etc.

So, if it’s installed backwards, it should fold down forwards instead of backwards, if properly installed?  

It’s not really rare–the SG BP is more uncommon. The ivory post is useless if it can’t be seen by shooter.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1176
Member Since:
September 22, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11
October 17, 2021 - 2:40 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost
sp_ReportPost

clarence said

It’s not really rare–the SG BP is more uncommon. The ivory post is useless if it can’t be seen by shooter.  

I suppose the question is should the sight fold rearwards, as it does, or forwards?  When folded down, the ivory post is visible from both sides.  When up, the ivory post touches the front side of the barrel so as to not be visible at all, and you have the round globe with a post.  Which makes more sense to me as the visible folded down front ivory bead might be confusing when firing using the elevated globe sight and post.

Thoughts?

See attached photographs.

EA297FD5-1838-459B-A3EC-479465BAD8B4.jpegImage Enlarger96161EBB-21FA-4086-8342-D38492D46359.jpegImage Enlarger802E64B1-DF9A-433B-AEFD-EE30690BC953.jpegImage Enlarger

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1176
Member Since:
September 22, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
12
October 17, 2021 - 2:42 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost
sp_ReportPost

4F5F7FB8-26C5-4564-AA9D-D7CC4882A552.jpegImage EnlargerAnd so much for the theory of visible ivory when using the globe sight.  I see this is visible as a small dot when folded up.  See repeated photograph.

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4178
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
13
October 17, 2021 - 3:25 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost
sp_ReportPost

mrcvs said
And so much for the theory of visible ivory when using the globe sight.  I see this is visible as a small dot when folded up.  See repeated photograph.  

That white dot is merely the butt end of the ivory post.  Maybe it was Lyman’s idea that if the top of the post was damaged, it could be pushed up higher through that hole, though the ivory is so tightly fitted into its socket that I’m skeptical it could be done without damage to the ivory.  Actually, I tried doing that once–the ivory wouldn’t budge.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1176
Member Since:
September 22, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
14
October 17, 2021 - 3:40 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost
sp_ReportPost

So, is it correct as is or backwards?  I would think it is correct and the globe sight folds backwards, just like a tang sight.  IIRC, Globe sights fold backwards.  I have two Model 1873 rifles in which they fold backwards, again IIRC.  Neither are readily accessible at this time.

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12592
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
15
October 17, 2021 - 4:08 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost
sp_ReportPost

mrcvs said
So, is it correct as is or backwards?  I would think it is correct and the globe sight folds backwards, just like a tang sight.  IIRC, Globe sights fold backwards.  I have two Model 1873 rifles in which they fold backwards, again IIRC.  Neither are readily accessible at this time.  

Ian,

The front sight is currently installed backwards on your Model 1892, and any other gun if it folds to the rear.  The Beach Combination and Lyman No. 5 Combination sights were designed to fold towards the muzzle.

Bert

WACA 6571L, Historian & Board of Director Member
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1267
Member Since:
July 8, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
16
October 17, 2021 - 5:04 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost
sp_ReportPost

I have the same sight on my model 1892 takedown.

IMG_8725.JPGImage EnlargerIMG_8723.JPGImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 411
Member Since:
September 19, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
17
October 17, 2021 - 5:31 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost
sp_ReportPost

Bert and others,  I agree fully with Bert on this topic.  Have seen them installed backwards, and the current owners were happy and sure that was correct.  But…..supposed to fold forwards.  TimKiss

Avatar
Troutdale, OR
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1316
Member Since:
June 26, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
18
October 17, 2021 - 5:38 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost
sp_ReportPost

I have the same sight on my 1894 32 WS.  Installed folding forward as well:

P1070841-1.JPGImage EnlargerP1070843-1.JPGImage EnlargerP1070844-1.JPGImage EnlargerP1070847-1.JPGImage Enlarger

Don

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4178
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
19
October 17, 2021 - 5:58 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost
sp_ReportPost

tim tomlinson said
 Have seen them installed backwards, and the current owners were happy and sure that was correct. 

Rather amazing those owners wouldn’t instinctively grasp, without instruction, that the aiming point of the sight should be facing toward the shooter, not the target.

Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5158
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
20
October 17, 2021 - 6:22 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost
sp_ReportPost

Nice looking 92. The ivory is up too high. It should be flush with the metal tit. That is there to protect the ivory from getting broken off.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 628
Currently Online: Bill Hockett, clarence, [email protected]
Guest(s) 81
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
1873man: 5158
clarence: 4178
TXGunNut: 3824
Chuck: 3444
steve004: 3038
twobit: 2841
Maverick: 1999
JWA: 1784
Big Larry: 1718
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 16
Topics: 10275
Posts: 88551

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1400
Members: 11426
Moderators: 3
Admins: 3
Navigation