Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
1895 ?
Avatar
randy101
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 6
Member Since:
April 9, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
April 2, 2014 - 1:30 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I just picked up this 1895 serial no 3073. I’d like to take it to Tulsa tomorrow but need some info. It appears to have some upgraded wood that doesn’t show on the factory letter. It was sent in for repair 11/24/1897. Would it that have been upgraded at that time? Also could I get a evaluation and a fair value? Sorry for the short notice and thanks in advance

https://imageshack.com/i/n642kdj
https://imageshack.com/i/0ltpk0j
https://imageshack.com/i/nrv2moj
https://imageshack.com/i/0zf6c0j
https://imageshack.com/i/f1vnflj
https://imageshack.com/i/mrwhnsj

Avatar
"road king"
Guest
Guests
2
April 2, 2014 - 2:13 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

In my opinion I don’t believe it is Winchester wood, no ebony insert in fore stock and the checkering looks to coarse for Winchester. What does the butt plate look like and what caliber is it? Looks like a nice condition flat side???

Avatar
randy101
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 6
Member Since:
April 9, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
April 2, 2014 - 2:56 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

The buttplate appears to be correct and the Cal. Is .30.40 krag.

Avatar
Maverick
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2035
Member Since:
May 23, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
April 2, 2014 - 4:18 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Early Flatside Forearms don’t have the Ebony inlays. That said the wood finish appears to have been re-done or messed with. The checkering doesn’t look to be factory. I would think the caliber marking should say 30 U.S. not 30 ARMY. Or at least the barrel is a much later barrel way past a 1897 R&R. But then again you do have double proof marks on the gun. So possibly another R&R took place at a later date. Some of the screws look new and looks like there may have been some re-bluing done. Looks like a nice shooter Flatside.

Those are some things I notice in my humble opinion, granted I’m not an expert. If you want an honest appraisal or fair value, I would post more pics showing more details. With some more overall photos, like the receiver, etc. I’m sure more knowledgeable folks will chim in.

Sincerely,
Maverick

Avatar
Mark W.
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 184
Member Since:
January 19, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
April 2, 2014 - 6:56 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

My 1905 says .30US

Avatar
sgtsemo
Guest
Guests
6
April 2, 2014 - 9:25 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

My 1905 M95 sporting Rifle also says 30 US for what it’s worth.

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12895
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
April 2, 2014 - 10:32 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

The early flat-side Sporting Rifles did indeed have the ebony insert in the forend stock. Winchester made them that way from day one of the Model 1895 production.

I agree that the subject rifle has a number of clues that point towards a non-factory rebuild.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 189
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6415
Chuck: 5824
steve004: 5179
1873man: 4701
deerhunter: 2696
Big Larry: 2550
twobit: 2497
mrcvs: 2197
Maverick: 2035
Newest Members:
JSB
Long Ridge
Harrytheman
Winchesterman
RonHSE
nmlittlebigman
Brewcrew602
Wheelies
Tburk2012
G.H. KITCHENS
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14744
Posts: 131858

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10003
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation