July 9, 2011
I’m looking for opinions of whether an original condition lesser grade antique gun is more or less desirable than a restored one.
I have an addiction to Winchester model 1890’s, especially the antique second models. My collecting budget does not allow for the purchase of high grade original guns.
I also enjoy refinishing/restoring shooter grade (or worse) Model 1890’s.
My question is about my latest purchase.
First, please examine the rifle I just purchased that is not collector grade.
Now look at a similar gun that I restored a couple of years back. It’s the same year of production.
I’m assuming I could restore my recent purchase for approximately another $100-200 investment ( stock, barrel liner etc.) I’m not considering the many hours of labor involved as it is a hobby.
Which gun would you rather own? From a value perspective, am I devaluing the gun with a restoration?
Or would it be better to maybe just find an original replacement stock and/or leave the rifle as is?
Just looking for opinions from seasoned collectors….thanks
May 2, 2009
I don’t see much wrong with the gun except the stock. It looks like a good used gun. I would just replace the stock and leave it at that. Once restored the value will always be capped and it will never be original again. I could see if the gun was heavily rusted or extra holes in it would make it a candidate for restoration.
WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Most Users Ever Online: 628
Currently Browsing this Page:
Guest Posters: 1238
Newest Members:Dave Smith_1, Jack Dennis, Louis Olesen, Al H, rockittsled, dbro, Joe Mabie, steve childs, Rick Teal, Daniel Connolly