WACA Life Member--- NRA Life Member---- Cody Firearms member since 1991 Researching the Winchester 1873's
Email: [email protected]
WACA Life Member--- NRA Life Member---- Cody Firearms member since 1991 Researching the Winchester 1873's
Email: [email protected]
November 7, 2015
Bert H. said
I have seen that same”1/2″ marking and notation in the records on a few other occasions, and it is my belief (opinion) that it was how Winchester documented a duplicate serial numbered gun at that time.Bert
I think the discussion went along the lines of the “1/2” meaning “one of two” and “2/2” meaning “two of two”. Would be nice to see an image of the ledger entries for these rifles.
Mike
steve004 said
So the unique aspect of the 1/2 added to the serial number adds how much to the value of the rifle?
Nothing in my opinion Steve…unless I owned it ?. Apprehension and possible deduction for some as they don’t understand the meaning, especially at a gun show for those who’ve never seen it & feel it’s not something the factory did ??
Rick C
steve004 said
So the unique aspect of the 1/2 added to the serial number adds how much to the value of the rifle?
If I remember its condition correctly it added 50% or more to this gun.
Bob
WACA Life Member--- NRA Life Member---- Cody Firearms member since 1991 Researching the Winchester 1873's
Email: [email protected]
In the case of two Colt single action’s with the same serial number it does not increase value unless you own both. But a Winchester with 1/2 added to the serial number is different, you don’t have to own both. It’s a lot like a two headed coin, it’s rare. I collect rare and would pay extra. T/R
I think anyone who wouldn’t pay extra for the “1/2” would not be in the running as far as acquiring the rifle – because others would pay more. I would pay more, but it wouldn’t be 50%. That would also mean I wouldn’t be in the running for acquiring the rifle – at least the Winchester under discussion.
November 7, 2015
steve004 said
I think anyone who wouldn’t pay extra for the “1/2” would not be in the running as far as acquiring the rifle – because others would pay more. I would pay more, but it wouldn’t be 50%. That would also mean I wouldn’t be in the running for acquiring the rifle – at least the Winchester under discussion.
I’m a fan of unusual or interesting specimens but that doesn’t mean I’ll pay a huge premium because I know that most conservative collectors only pay extra for condition an/or rarity.
Mike
1 Guest(s)