Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Rip off
Avatar
Buck94
Charlotte, NC
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 200
Member Since:
May 14, 2025
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
July 6, 2026 - 10:08 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Well I thought I had seen high prices before but today took the cake. I won a nice 1897 Trench gun in auction (https://www.auctionzip.com/auction-lot/scarce!-u.s.-martial-territory-of-hawaii-winchest_32A2DDC51D)and received a notice through shipping saint like I have a hundred times before and fell out of my chair. The shipper wants to charge me $423 for the trench gun, bayonet and a paper weight that is 1lb and 3 inches by 2 inch’s. Both the bayonet and paper weight could easily fit in the box with the Trench gun. Typically I pay $50 to $75 to get a firearm shipped but have paid as much as $150 with some shops but $423. Fellas, Am I losing my mind or is that just an unreasonable fee? AZ to NC in case anyone is wondering. 

Avatar
426crown
Taos NM
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 451
Member Since:
October 29, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
July 6, 2026 - 10:19 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Greedy Bastards………………………

Avatar
Chuck
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6748
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
July 6, 2026 - 10:44 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

426crown said
Greedy Bastards………………………
  

I agree. 

Avatar
cj57
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 490
Member Since:
November 9, 2008
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
4
July 6, 2026 - 10:50 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Wow! That is a RIP off, should be in the $75 range, it’s a 3rd party shipper, if charging for box tape, ECT… Ok $125 I wouldn’t complain 

Avatar
MidwestCrisis
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 212
Member Since:
January 8, 2025
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
July 6, 2026 - 10:59 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Are they charging 10% for insurance?

I think LSB is 1%

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 14416
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
6
July 7, 2026 - 12:45 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Yes, very greedy or more likely they decided to jack up the shipping cost to increase the profit margin on that gun. 

Speaking of that gun, it is not an authentic WW I Trench Gun.  Per the serialization records, it was manufactured in mid September 1920… almost a full year after WW I ended.  Further, the heat shield on it is suspect.  It should be marked as shown in the attached picture.  The “PAT APL FOR” marking is only found on the very early WW I production Trench Guns.  Well before WW I production ended, the heat shields were all marked “PAT.JAN.15 & MAR.19.1918“.

Heat-Shield-Patent-marking-712261.jpg

 

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Buck94
Charlotte, NC
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 200
Member Since:
May 14, 2025
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
July 7, 2026 - 1:13 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Bert H. said
Yes, very greedy or more likely they decided to jack up the shipping cost to increase the profit margin on that gun. 
Speaking of that gun, it is not an authentic WW I Trench Gun.  Per the serialization records, it was manufactured in mid September 1920… almost a full year after WW I ended.  Further, the heat shield on it is suspect.  It should be marked as shown in the attached picture.  The “PAT APL FOR” marking is only found on the very early WW I production Trench Guns.  Well before WW I production ended, the heat shields were all marked “PAT.JAN.15 & MAR.19.1918”.

 
Bert
  

Thanks Bert, they covered themselves by saying it was in the ordnance “pipeline” when the war ended. A little auction house artistry no doubt. It is for my daughter as she asked me for one awhile back. I kept losing out at auction with everyone I bid on going for over 6k until this one. I was pleased to get it for the $3,450 but I guess we now know why. Hopefully still not a bad price and the added benefit of it will be protecting her home! Once it comes in I will look at the heat shield and report back. Fingers crossed. Appreciate the feedback!

Avatar
Jeremy P
The Great State
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1242
Member Since:
April 30, 2023
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
July 7, 2026 - 1:47 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Sounds like a fun road trip to go get it is in order and skip the carriers!

Avatar
Buck94
Charlotte, NC
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 200
Member Since:
May 14, 2025
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
July 8, 2026 - 11:31 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Well the plot thickens. They lowered their rate to $380. Still crazy high so I called in and was speaking to the young lady who answered the phone and questioned the rate. The owner comes on the line and went off on me. He said his Fed Ex rate alone was $120. Possible I suppose but when I told him there are better rates he said it is impossible because he is direct through FedEx. I don’t know if he is stupid, lazy or a liar but I then asked why he was adding over $250 on top of the shipping rate and he said he deserved to make money. Heck, I’m a capitalist and I agree but when I told him that is a ridiculous mark up he told me he would take it back to the auction house and hung up on me. Breaks my heart! In 15 minutes I had googled the closest FFL to the auction house, called them and they agreed to ship it to me for 1/3rd what this clown was trying to charge me. Interestingly the auction house or at least the person I spoke with there didn’t seem to care he is taking advantage of their clients. Makes me wonder if he is kicking back to them and that is part of the reason for the outrageous prices? Happy ending for me though!

Avatar
MidwestCrisis
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 212
Member Since:
January 8, 2025
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
July 9, 2026 - 1:15 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Good deal, glad you resolved that to your satisfaction.  Who knows what the full story is but obviously he wanted more money out of the gun.  Hopefully that’s the end of your troubles.  

Avatar
steve004
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5708
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11
July 11, 2026 - 12:51 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Buck94 said
Well the plot thickens. They lowered their rate to $380. Still crazy high so I called in and was speaking to the young lady who answered the phone and questioned the rate. The owner comes on the line and went off on me. He said his Fed Ex rate alone was $120. Possible I suppose but when I told him there are better rates he said it is impossible because he is direct through FedEx. I don’t know if he is stupid, lazy or a liar but I then asked why he was adding over $250 on top of the shipping rate and he said he deserved to make money. Heck, I’m a capitalist and I agree but when I told him that is a ridiculous mark up he told me he would take it back to the auction house and hung up on me. Breaks my heart! In 15 minutes I had googled the closest FFL to the auction house, called them and they agreed to ship it to me for 1/3rd what this clown was trying to charge me. Interestingly the auction house or at least the person I spoke with there didn’t seem to care he is taking advantage of their clients. Makes me wonder if he is kicking back to them and that is part of the reason for the outrageous prices? Happy ending for me though!
  

I’ve had minimal experience buying from auction houses.  As I understand it, some auction houses have their own staff do the shipping.  Other auction houses have the shipping service performed by an outside business.  They receive payment for that service from the winning bidder.  That payment needs to cover the actual shipping charge and insurance as well as the time for their employees to pack the gun up, perform record keeping, accounting oversight, pay someone to answer the phone etc. etc.  And of course as a business, a profit would be expected to be built in – and it needs to be profitable enough to entice someone to do it vs. do something else that would be more profitable.  This is making more sense to me than when I first read the original post.

As to the gun itself, the “in the ordinance pipeline” ….Confused An intriguing thought anyway.

I’m glad you like the gun.  As you say, you were able to purchase it for much less than other examples you pursued.  

Avatar
Buck94
Charlotte, NC
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 200
Member Since:
May 14, 2025
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
12
July 11, 2026 - 2:06 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

steve004 said

Buck94 said
Well the plot thickens. They lowered their rate to $380. Still crazy high so I called in and was speaking to the young lady who answered the phone and questioned the rate. The owner comes on the line and went off on me. He said his Fed Ex rate alone was $120. Possible I suppose but when I told him there are better rates he said it is impossible because he is direct through FedEx. I don’t know if he is stupid, lazy or a liar but I then asked why he was adding over $250 on top of the shipping rate and he said he deserved to make money. Heck, I’m a capitalist and I agree but when I told him that is a ridiculous mark up he told me he would take it back to the auction house and hung up on me. Breaks my heart! In 15 minutes I had googled the closest FFL to the auction house, called them and they agreed to ship it to me for 1/3rd what this clown was trying to charge me. Interestingly the auction house or at least the person I spoke with there didn’t seem to care he is taking advantage of their clients. Makes me wonder if he is kicking back to them and that is part of the reason for the outrageous prices? Happy ending for me though!
  

I’ve had minimal experience buying from auction houses.  As I understand it, some auction houses have their own staff do the shipping.  Other auction houses have the shipping service performed by an outside business.  They receive payment for that service from the winning bidder.  That payment needs to cover the actual shipping charge and insurance as well as the time for their employees to pack the gun up, perform record keeping, accounting oversight, pay someone to answer the phone etc. etc.  And of course as a business, a profit would be expected to be built in – and it needs to be profitable enough to entice someone to do it vs. do something else that would be more profitable.  This is making more sense to me than when I first read the original post.
As to the gun itself, the “in the ordinance pipeline” …. An intriguing thought anyway.
I’m glad you like the gun.  As you say, you were able to purchase it for much less than other examples you pursued.  
  

You are correct some auction houses do handle their own shipping in house. In this case, they did not and outsourced it to an independent mail house who also holds an FFL to ship firearms and he was billing me direct. I agree with your overall statements but Let me offer an example that sums up perfectly your contention that it has to be profitable enough to do it. Gas in my area costs about $3.55 at almost every gas station you pass. Maybe it is $3.45 at some and $3.65 at others and one can reasonably assume that covers all the expenses necessary for a business to be profitable. This shop trying to charge me $450 to mail a firearm is the equivalent of a gas station trying to charge $10.50 a gallon when every other shop in town charges 1/3rd of that price. The FFL who mailed it to me charged $155 – $55 postage, $50 pack and transfer and $50 because they had to go pick it up, otherwise the apples to apples cost is only $105 vs the Original $450 or reduced $380. It gets worse when you break it down and compare the $50 pack and transfer I was charged vs the $400 pack and transfer fee the original shop wanted. Anyone on here make $400 an hour? How about $1600 an hour because I could easily box, label and mail 4 rifles an hour? I think the truth is this guy is just an immoral jerk who is trying to take advantage of captive auction clients who don’t know any better. 

Avatar
steve004
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5708
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
13
July 11, 2026 - 2:23 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Buck – 

It surely does seem this shipper is into substantial profit.  Having lived a while now, it’s my observation that when it comes to capitalism, pricing is much more determined by whatever the market will tolerate vs. morality or ethics.  I see that for those auction houses that outsource their shipping, buyers are left in much more unaware/unsuspecting vulnerable situation.  The auction house can wash their hands of it pointing out bidders were made aware that they don’t handle the shipping.  It’s a set-up to get stung.  I don’t care for it at all and I would have not appreciated being in the situation you found yourself in.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 10
Member Since:
September 13, 2020
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
14
July 12, 2026 - 9:08 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

$120 Is more or less reasonable for shipping, but the $250 top-up is unconscionable.  He is more than tripling the shipping cost because he’s apparently not happy with the hammer price.  That, however, is how auctions go.  You either accept the hammer price or you don’t sell at auction.  I have sold farm equipment at auction and did not get as much as I hoped for, but by putting it in the auction I figured I had accepted their sale as final.  The word unscrupulous comes to mind.

Avatar
Buck94
Charlotte, NC
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 200
Member Since:
May 14, 2025
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
15
July 14, 2026 - 9:49 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Bert H. said
Yes, very greedy or more likely they decided to jack up the shipping cost to increase the profit margin on that gun. 
Speaking of that gun, it is not an authentic WW I Trench Gun.  Per the serialization records, it was manufactured in mid September 1920… almost a full year after WW I ended.  Further, the heat shield on it is suspect.  It should be marked as shown in the attached picture.  The “PAT APL FOR” marking is only found on the very early WW I production Trench Guns.  Well before WW I production ended, the heat shields were all marked “PAT.JAN.15 & MAR.19.1918”.

 
Bert
  

Bert your suspicions were verified. The Gunsmith at the FFL verified the heat shield does not match the rifle and believes this is just a standard 97 someone has modified to appear to be a Trench Gun. If I had bought it for anything other than home defense for my daughter I might be inclined to complain but think it is  still acceptable for my purposes. Appreciate your catching this for me though!

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 21294
Currently Online: Bert H., cj57, Bill Jokela, Bill Hanzel, mfivefour, 86Win, kellswater, TJ_Mayes
Guest(s) 341
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
TXGunNut: 7438
clarence: 7119
Chuck: 6748
steve004: 5708
1873man: 4931
deerhunter: 3010
twobit: 2702
Big Larry: 2578
mrcvs: 2469
Maverick: 2191
Newest Members:
Carol
chateau-thierry18
priley6
Cwright1016
jkingrph
Backslide9
30-40
Guns.com
TwoQ
Rom_c
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 15997
Posts: 145871

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10808
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation