Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Model 1894 Takedown Barrel Verification
Avatar
25-35
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 121
Member Since:
June 28, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
April 20, 2019 - 6:45 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

How can you determine if the takedown barrel on a Winchester Model 1894 is original to the receiver end of the same rifle? 

Are different takedown barrels in the same caliber interchangeable to the receiver end of the same caliber?

Lastly, are takedown barrels of other calibers (specific of course to the calibers originally offered in the Model 1894) interchangeable  to the same rifle?

Thank-you.

Avatar
win4575
Montana
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 698
Member Since:
November 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
April 21, 2019 - 1:03 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Winchester offered these extra barrel assemblies for one receiver/buttstock assembly, as special order extras.  I have seen several two barrel sets in the model 1894 and one three barrel set.

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12873
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
April 21, 2019 - 5:27 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Winchester did not number the barrel assembly to the receiver on any of the Winchester lever-action rifle models like they did for the shotguns, and slide-action rifles.

For the most part, if you take a take down barrel assembly off of one rifle, it will fit on a different receiver, but not always perfectly.

Winchester made at least (125) Take Down Model 1894 Rifles with multiple barrel assemblies.

Most of the multi-barrel Take Downs can be lettered through the CFM.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
25-35
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 121
Member Since:
June 28, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
April 21, 2019 - 11:44 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Bert, WIN4575: Thank-you both very much  for your insight. 

Avatar
Burt Humphrey
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 627
Member Since:
April 1, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
April 21, 2019 - 6:57 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Richard – go to the Winter 1996 magazine and you will find a good article entitled “Multiple Barrel Winchesters” – this will give you a lot of good information and answer some of your questions. Also, there is previous discussion on this forum – under Winchester Rifles, Model 1894, 2 barrel set. As Bert Hartman said, any 94 takedown barrel will fit on a 94 take down frame, regardless of caliber. However, my experience is the fit sucks if they did not come from the factory together. Years ago a guy here in Alaska had a fake 5 barrel set and one of the many, many indications of it being fake was the fit – some barrels just did not have the fit Winchester would have assured. I seem to recall some discussion years ago that there would be function problems if you put a smaller caliber rifle barrel like a 25-35 on a larger caliber receiver like a 38-55 (or vice-versa). I believe it had to do with cartridge cycling – Bert would be the one to know, understand and explain this if correct. If you look at the verifiable multi-barrel sets you will see there was never a small/large caliber combination produced. There are no 4 or 5 barrel sets which can be verified by CFM letter.

73del7.jpg

Avatar
25-35
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 121
Member Since:
June 28, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
April 21, 2019 - 10:45 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Burt, thank-you! I will look up that article and read it. Question precipitated by a 1921 Model 1894 octagon standard barrel sporting rifle 30 WCF. Takedown barrel retains  >85% blue however, receiver is approximately 60%. Realize this is standard as wear on receiver is always greater than barrel. Most who have seen this platform state  it has a rebarrel?

Bert, as always, thank-you. 

Bert (Hartman), I had sent you the SN etc. on this 1894 previously for your survey. 

Avatar
RickC
Guest
Guests
7
June 7, 2020 - 10:06 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

Burt Humphrey said
Richard – go to the Winter 1996 magazine and you will find a good article entitled “Multiple Barrel Winchesters” – this will give you a lot of good information and answer some of your questions. Also, there is previous discussion on this forum – under Winchester Rifles, Model 1894, 2 barrel set. As Bert Hartman said, any 94 takedown barrel will fit on a 94 take down frame, regardless of caliber. However, my experience is the fit sucks if they did not come from the factory together. Years ago a guy here in Alaska had a fake 5 barrel set and one of the many, many indications of it being fake was the fit – some barrels just did not have the fit Winchester would have assured. I seem to recall some discussion years ago that there would be function problems if you put a smaller caliber rifle barrel like a 25-35 on a larger caliber receiver like a 38-55 (or vice-versa). I believe it had to do with cartridge cycling – Bert would be the one to know, understand and explain this if correct. If you look at the verifiable multi-barrel sets you will see there was never a small/large caliber combination produced. There are no 4 or 5 barrel sets which can be verified by CFM letter.  

If it’s the 5 barrel set from Alaska on page 8 of Bob Renneberg’s 2nd edition, Bob certainly feels it’s authentic as does the CFM.

RickC6331E8F7-9D1C-4AB6-8654-8EF34C5B3A12.jpegImage Enlarger

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12873
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
June 7, 2020 - 10:17 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

RickC said

If it’s the 5 barrel set from Alaska on page 8 of Bob Renneberg’s 2nd edition, Bob certainly feels it’s authentic as does the CFM.

RickC6331E8F7-9D1C-4AB6-8654-8EF34C5B3A12.jpegImage Enlarger  

Rick,

Bob Renneberg has since recanted his support for the originality of that faked 5-barrel set.  When I first saw it in person, I too was fooled by it.  After doing some research, it was determined to be a faked set.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
RickC
Guest
Guests
9
June 7, 2020 - 10:30 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Bert H. said

Rick,

Bob Renneberg has since recanted his support for the originality of that faked 5-barrel set.  When I first saw it in person, I too was fooled by it.  After doing some research, it was determined to be a faked set.

Bert  

Dang I was amazed at that piece but thanks for clarifying Bert. I do acknowledge his disclaimer for the possibility of omissions & errors.

RickC

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: Rat Rod Mac, Byron Russell, Tedk, Henry Mero, [email protected], markone1966
Guest(s) 147
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6408
Chuck: 5810
steve004: 5173
1873man: 4698
deerhunter: 2694
Big Larry: 2549
twobit: 2493
mrcvs: 2194
Maverick: 2029
Newest Members:
Temomar83
ross
Model94-2025
R.E. Moore
sjGUESTEST
WindsurfAruba
cedar swamp savage
tradecraft
Weida78
Alby
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14716
Posts: 131652

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 9983
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation