Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Model 1892 in 25-20 rebarrel project
Avatar
MCorrell
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 94
Member Since:
March 4, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
April 8, 2026 - 8:39 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

I have finally decided to upgrade/ improve my favorite shooter. The current 24” barrel is at best in fair condition but is very accurate using jacketed Remington .257”, 86 grain bullets that are currently out of production. I have tried many loads using .258”, 85 grain cast bullets and cannot get near the same accuracy as with the Remington bullets. 
I am looking at a Hunter brand replacement barrel but there are many options:

 5 or 6 groove rifling

single point or broached rifling

barrel length (would it help accuracy at 100 yards to longer than 24”?)

rate of twist

Does as anyone have experience with cast bullets with the above options? I would like to choose the best option for exclusively shooting cast bullets.

https://www.mikehunterrestorations.com/barrels.html

Avatar
Chuck
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6572
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
April 9, 2026 - 3:38 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

Mike Hunter is a long time WACA member and is very capable. 

Avatar
TXGunNut
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 7202
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
April 10, 2026 - 1:48 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

If you’re set on a replacement barrel I’d go with one as close to original specs as possible. Which cast bullet are you using? I’m not sure you’d get any benefit from single point rifling but that’s a question I’d run past Mr. Hunter. 

 

Mike

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Board Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
MCorrell
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 94
Member Since:
March 4, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
April 10, 2026 - 10:00 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

TXGunNut said
If you’re set on a replacement barrel I’d go with one as close to original specs as possible. Which cast bullet are you using? I’m not sure you’d get any benefit from single point rifling but that’s a question I’d run past Mr. Hunter. 
 
Mike
  

Hi Mike, I am leaning towards the factory standards which include single point rifling. I have been using Meister bullets with .258 dia and 86 grain weight but now hear they are no longer available. I may start casting my own so that I’ll always have a steady supply. There’s not much written about the 25-20

Avatar
TXGunNut
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 7202
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
April 11, 2026 - 2:39 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

MCorrell said

TXGunNut said
If you’re set on a replacement barrel I’d go with one as close to original specs as possible. Which cast bullet are you using? I’m not sure you’d get any benefit from single point rifling but that’s a question I’d run past Mr. Hunter. 
 
Mike
  

Hi Mike, I am leaning towards the factory standards which include single point rifling. I have been using Meister bullets with .258 dia and 86 grain weight but now hear they are no longer available. I may start casting my own so that I’ll always have a steady supply. There’s not much written about the 25-20
  

I have a ball with my 32WCF but was not able to find a 25-20 with a decent bore. I understand that’s pretty common. There are some good commercial cast bullets out there but casting may ensure a good supply once you find a bullet that works for you. Sounds like an interesting project. Please keep us posted.

 

Mike

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Board Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
MCorrell
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 94
Member Since:
March 4, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
April 11, 2026 - 8:30 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

My goal is to build what I can’t buy, a nice half octagon barrel model 1892 with a good shoot able bore. Since I have to go the new barrel route I might as well go with CCH of my existing action and components and eventually new wood. This will be a lifetime gun for sure.

Avatar
TXGunNut
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 7202
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
April 11, 2026 - 10:53 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I like the way you think. I bought an 1892 in 32WCF awhile back and quite honestly it was a mistake. I doubled down and had it relined, put a Marble tang sight and Lyman 17 front sight on it and it became quite the shooter. 

 

Mike

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Board Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
Pete Hynard
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 33
Member Since:
April 26, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
April 12, 2026 - 6:38 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I like the way you guys think too.

I have two centrefire Model ’73s.  One started life as a .38-40 that had a replacement barrel put on it a hundred years ago, maybe more.  The replacement was a Marlin .38-55 barrel that had the chamber cut off, re-threaded to fit the ’73 receiver and re-chambered to .38-40 calibre.  My wife bought if for me years ago.  I love that gun.  The barrel marking still says .38-55.
 
The bore was a little rough so I tried it with jacketed bullets.  It wasn’t a great group and the barrel got much hotter than is normal for a ’73.  Turns out, the bore slugged out at 0.381” and .38-40 bullets are 0.400”.  No wonder it got hot.  It goes to show you that the ’73 action is stronger than you think.
 
It couldn’t stay like that.  I had the barrel re-bored and re-rifled to .44-40.  Now it has a perfect bore and shoots like an ace.  It’s my favourite deer rifle.  I attached a target for you to see.
 
The other ‘73 began life as a .32-20.  I bought it as a shooter but it had a rough bore too.  My plan had been to re-line it but my gunsmith suggested swapping the barrel with one he had on hand.  The replacement was a Marlin .25-36 with a perfect bore, off a Marlin Model 1893.  Like my deer rifle, my gunsmith Steve cut the chamber off, re-threaded the barrel and re-chambered it to .25-20.  Now both rifles have old, beat-up octagon Marlin barrels and button magazines.  They’re a matched set.  I attached a pic.
 
I know what you’re thinking.  The .25-20 has a twist rate of 1:14 and the .25-36 is 1:8.  An 85-grain cast bullet comes out spinning twice as fast as it should.  “Don’t worry”, Steve said.  “It’s OK to spin them too fast, just don’t spin them too slow.”
 
You can read the whole story in an upcoming Winchester Collector magazine.  I think Brad has it planned for the next issue.
 
Pete Hynard, Ontario, Canada
 
The-matched-set-1.png1.8-inch-group-100-yards.jpeg
Avatar
MCorrell
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 94
Member Since:
March 4, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
April 13, 2026 - 1:38 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Thanks Pete. I’ll be looking for the whole story.  I’ll be sure to keep good notes on my project as it moves on.

Avatar
Pete Hynard
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 33
Member Since:
April 26, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
April 14, 2026 - 3:48 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Mark, when you started this thread, you asked about experience shooting cast bullets in the .25-20.

Besides the Model ’73 I told you about, I have a Model 1892 in .25-20.  All I shoot in it is cast bullets.  I can tell you what my experience has been.

First off, I have found the .25-20 to be a good calibre for cast bullets.  The smaller calibres have the reputation of being difficult to cast and load for, but I haven’t found that to be true of the .25-50.  Be sure your mould is in good condition, size your bullets 0.001” oversize, use a good lube and be sure to bell the case mouth slightly before seating.  Other than that, the normal rules apply.

Cast bullets need a good bore to shoot well and this is particularly true of the smaller calibres.  What I look for in a used gun is a bright, shiny bore with strong rifling and no visible pitting or wear.  You really want a bore that is near-perfect; otherwise, the bullet will leave a streak of lead on the rough spots and each bullet will leave a little more.  A lot of .25-20s date from the era of corrosive primers and rough bores are common.  If your rifle was made before 1920, it definitely used corrosive primers and it probably has a rough bore.  Rough bores canBore-view-1.jpgBullet-casting.jpeg shoot jacketed bullets OK, but not cast.

I attached a look down the bore of my Model ’92.  It was made in 1914.  It’s OK but it’s not perfect.  If your bore looks any worse than this, it probably won’t shoot cast bullets well.

.25-20s do best with low-velocity loads and this is especially true for cast bullets.  The original ammo shot an 86-grain lead bullet at 1,460 f.p.s. and that’s a good place to start.  The loading that I settled on is a plain-base 85-grain bullet over 7.0 grains of IMR 4227 for a velocity of 1,356 f.p.s.  The alloy I use is wheel-weight metal and the mould is RCBS #25-85-CM.  With a hard alloy like that and slow velocity, the bullets pass through small game with minimal meat damage.  For target shooting, it’s mild and gentle to shoot.  In my rifle, group size is ½ inch at 25 yards and 3 inches at 100 yards.  

For anything faster than 1,500 f.p.s., you’ll need a gas-check bullet and a harder alloy.  I’ve tried a 65-grain GC bullet, Lyman No. 2 alloy and 10.5 grains of IMR 4227 for a velocity of 1,950 f.p.s.  Accuracy stayed good at 3 inches @ 100 yards.  But if you’re after varmints, you really need a proper varmint bullet, not a hard-alloy casting.

You asked about rate-of-twist.  Winchester made its Model ’92/.25-20 barrels with a 1:14 twist.  That’s what mine has.  

The Greenhill Formula is the standard method for determining optimal rate-of-twist. The link down below will take you to the vCalc.com website where you can do the calculation yourself.  You will need to know the diameter, length, specific gravity and speed of the bullet to do the math.  I attached a pic of my 85-grain cast bullet.  For it, the calculation worked out to 1:15.  As my gunsmith Steve said, “It’s OK to spin them too fast, just don’t spin them too slow”.

If you’re getting a custom barrel made, talk to your barrel maker.  He will know more about this than me and he will give you better advice.

Good luck.  Let me know how things work out.

Pete

https://www.vcalc.com/wiki/AndrewBudd/Greenhill+Formula+for+Optimal+Rifling+Twist+Rate 

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 21294
Currently Online: tsbccut, Heather
Guest(s) 970
Top Posters:
TXGunNut: 7202
clarence: 7119
Chuck: 6572
steve004: 5567
1873man: 4878
deerhunter: 2890
twobit: 2669
Big Larry: 2578
mrcvs: 2403
Maverick: 2172
Newest Members:
32WinSpecModel94
Jtflyer
BOAT
Triggerflappy
TrevReiten
Matthew Prince
Paradox757
shuiqlazam
PNWSkol
rayjoy51
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 15689
Posts: 142597

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10566
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation