Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Is there an official light weight Model 86?
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Texas
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 102
Member Since:
August 5, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
February 23, 2016 - 1:15 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

This question is for Bert and other ’86 experts.  While in Reno, Bert was patient enough to explain to me how collectors (including myself) frequently ascribe the light weight term to both .33 and .45-70 Model 86s.  So I have to admit I had way too much bourbon, scotch and beer since then to remember exactly what he said.  But my general recollection is that the .33 is the only true light weight Model 86 rifle.  All other calibers had to be special ordered as such.  That would seem to go against Madl’s publication indicating that both the .33 & .45-70 (later production of course) were standard light weight rifles.  So can someone clarify for me?

Thanks – Greg

Avatar
Wyoming - Gods Country
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1271
Member Since:
January 26, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
February 23, 2016 - 3:30 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Greg

Certainly no expert here, but I can offer my understanding of your topic. I believe the 1886’s that were truly catalogued and therefore letter as ELW were 45-70’s with the 22″ barrel. I happen to have a TD that letters as ELW in the aforementioned configuration. The ’86’s in 33 caliber are quite often called ELW or LW because a large number of them have some of the same characteristics such as 1/2 mag, lighter weight round barrel, although 24″ and shotgun butt. I think the 33’s were just listed by themselves and not necessarily lightweights (by catalog anyway).

86-ELW-3.jpgImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

                                                                               ~Gary~

                                                                                                                                                                              94-SRR.jpg

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10835
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
3
February 23, 2016 - 5:36 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Greg,

Gary nailed it. Winchester never officially referred to the 33 Caliber Model 1886 rifles as “Lightweight”. That stated, the barrel contour for the 24″ 33 WCF is nearly identical to the 22″ Extra Lightweight 45-70 barrel. The term “Lightweight” as it applies to the Model 1886 was created by the collecting fraternity.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Texas
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 102
Member Since:
August 5, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
February 23, 2016 - 4:43 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Thanks for setting me straight.  Greg

Avatar
Moderator
Moderator
Forum Posts: 960
Member Since:
December 30, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
February 23, 2016 - 7:28 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Last year at the Cody show there was a very excellent display of 1886s that had numerous ELW special order rifles in it.  There were at least two rifles in the display which the factory letter listed as just “light weight”, not “extra light” or “extra light weight” as is listed in the letters for the other rifles in the display.  They were 40-82 and 50-100-450 rifles with shotgun butts and button magazines and 24″ round barrels, among other special order options. I have copies here of every letter because I judged displays, like Bert.  I realize these are not the same as the specific Extra Light Weight Model 1886 configuration that Winchester cataloged.  Perhaps some of what collectors have come to call “light weights” also has some origins in the term apparently being used in the factory records.

Brad

Regards

Brad Dunbar

http://1895book.com/

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 103
Member Since:
December 12, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
February 24, 2016 - 12:25 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Not to sure why anyone would call these”lightweights” I have a 86 takedown in .33, and it sure isn’t “light”

Avatar
Ontario Canada
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 584
Member Since:
April 23, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
February 24, 2016 - 4:24 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

86 is a heavy gun

I think in 33 there was only one size barrel offered ?

I  think it was the Pirkle book that gives the muzzle O.D. dimension ,  And calls this size both lightweight ,and extra lightweight

since I am a target shooter and don’t have to carry guns around I prefer the heaviest longest barrel possible,and consider the barrel on my 33 very light ,although it shoots well letting the barrel cool between shots My 86 ,  33 has C.B. And full mag, so not in the most popular post 1900 configuration of SB and 1/2 mag 

If the 45-70 has the same muzzle O.D.  ,  It would be an even lighter barrel with the larger bore. better for carrying 

Phil

Phils-Schuetzen-compressed.jpg 

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Online: Burt Humphrey, Bert H., 426crown, clarence, rogertherelic
Guest(s) 184
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6367
TXGunNut: 5034
Chuck: 4598
1873man: 4322
steve004: 4250
Big Larry: 2343
twobit: 2295
mrcvs: 1726
TR: 1722
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12758
Posts: 111123

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1766
Members: 8852
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation