Log In
August 5, 2013
Offline
All i have is a mobile phone right now but this rifle looks very standard to me, albeit with a low SN. I just don’t understand were the value is at this price. And not a first model either. what am i missing here?
http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=487293830
Greg
August 27, 2014
Offline
Looks like two people really wanted the gun….
“If you can’t convince them, confuse them”
President Harry S. Truman
November 9, 2008
Offline
Some just like low numbered guns, I have #571 and it is a 2nd model TD 38-55 and didn’t pay anywhere near that!
July 19, 2013
Offline
Could have been cocktail hour…….
January 26, 2011
Offline
Its a nice early 32-40, but the would be more appealing if the Lyman 21 lettered. Probably a bit too early to see one of those show up on a ’94 anyway. Have any of you seen a Model 1894 with a 21 sight that letters in the 4 digit serial range?
All things considered, I don’t see how this rifle made is past the $3k mark. Just my opinion.
~Gary~
November 9, 2008
Offline
pdog72 said
Its a nice early 32-40, but the would be more appealing if the Lyman 21 lettered. Probably a bit too early to see one of those show up on a ’94 anyway. Have any of you seen a Model 1894 with a 21 sight that letters in the 4 digit serial range?
All things considered, I don’t see how this rifle made is past the $3k mark. Just my opinion.
I missed that 21 sight being on the low number gun. I’m used to seeing them on 1894s, I was just looking at condition! I was thinking the same on value.
