Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Hello - New Member Intro!
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6237
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
41
May 30, 2025 - 2:53 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Maverick said

TXGunNut said

I seem to recall a cartridge board with kraft paper covering the wires & such in the back but can’t recall the variation. The paper was in poor condition but the rest of the board was pretty cool, IIRC.

Mike  

I don’t necessarily know that I would call it Kraft paper, as I don’t know if it is or not. If you look closely at the photo of the back of the board I posted. You can see the edges of the paper that was glued to the board which covering the wires.

  

I’m thinking maybe the paper didn’t last long. 

 

Mike

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Board Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1984
Member Since:
May 23, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
42
May 30, 2025 - 4:34 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

TXGunNut said I’m thinking maybe the paper didn’t last long.   

Just like with everything else collectable the conditions it was kept in is the key to its survival. There are several cartridge boards that still have their original paper backing.

I’ve got ammo boxes and instruction sheets and other ephemera that are 150 years old and counting. 

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1984
Member Since:
May 23, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
43
May 31, 2025 - 4:28 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Chad@GalleryFirearms said
From what I gathered the 40-65 was a chamber option in the 1884 catalog on the M1883. The internet seems to think it was never actually produced? 

From what I can gather is that the “40-65 Hotchkiss” cartridge and the “40-65 W.C.F.” are the same cartridge. It appears in the Jan. 1st, 1884 Catalog and is not shown in the Sept. 1st, 1884 Catalog. And it appears on the 1884 Cartridge Board. So they certainly made the cartridge in some quantity in 1884.

Jan-1-1884-Catalog-3.jpgImage EnlargerJan-1-1887-Catalog-3.jpgImage Enlarger Here are images of the Jan. 1884 & June 1887 Catalog pages. (For some reason I can’t get them to rotate properly when posting on the Forum.) The images used or printer’s blocks of the cartridges look identical. Except for the wording on the shell of the cartridge.

The company must have developed it in the 1883-84 timeframe as a potential chambering for the Hotchkiss Rifle. It must have been shelved for a couple of years until the introduction of the Model 1886 Rifle, which it is one of the chamberings offered for that Model Rifle. Which makes sense that there are some un-headstamped cartridges out there in 40-65. As by the year 1886, WRACo was headstamping their cartridges. 

Giles & Shuey’s cartridge box book has an entire page that discusses this very cartridge. Along with the associated confusion with a similar Winchester, Marlin and Colt cartridge.

Sincerely,

Maverick

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1984
Member Since:
May 23, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
44
May 31, 2025 - 6:36 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I just noticed some other interesting details when looking at the Kiko auction photos again.

1884Board-Portion.jpgImage EnlargerSo when looking at this photo it appears quite a few of the cartridges on the board have head stamps on them. Which in my opinion, the head stamped cartridges are replacements as they’re later than the when the board was made. From what I’ve gathered WRACo started headstamping 1885-86. Which correlates with my previous discussion about the back of the board being redone and the cartridges being remounted/retied with the board being reframed. So the board having an restoration, which is not uncommon at all.

Plus when you compare them with this other 1884 board. They don’t appear to have head stamps on this board.1884Board-Early-CloseUp.jpgImage Enlarger

Another detail I noticed about these boards which I knew one aspect of, is that there are two variations of the 1884 Board. One with this dark background and the other version with a lighter or white background. This is discussed in one of the Goles’ articles in the WACA Journal. But what I didn’t notice before is that the white version has less cartridges on it. The inner circle of cartridges on the dark board has 31 cartridges, were the white board has only 29. You can see where the 40-65 Hotchkiss has been dropped from the board and is not shown. 1884Board-Late-CloseUp.jpgImage EnlargerThis in my opinion based on what is shown on the Jan 1884 Catalog and the September 1884 Catalog, and that these White colored boards are likely later made 1884 Boards. Likely made after September or around the same time frame as the September 1884 Catalog drops the 40-65 Hotchkiss from its listing.  

Sincerely,

Maverick

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: Tony. R, Edward Kitner, gene66, DQL5150, Mopglen
Guest(s) 105
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6237
Chuck: 5668
steve004: 5061
1873man: 4669
Big Larry: 2517
twobit: 2486
mrcvs: 2150
Maverick: 1984
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14509
Posts: 129347

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2030
Members: 9840
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation