
December 21, 2006

Hi Rick; You’ve got to keep in mind that there were several factory made up guns using 1894, mod. 55 and mod. 64 components. I don’t know if this is one of them though.
W.A.C.A. life member, Marlin Collectors Assn. charter and life member, C,S.S.A. member and general gun nut.

March 14, 2022

Henry Mero said
Hi Rick; You’ve got to keep in mind that there were several factory made up guns using 1894, mod. 55 and mod. 64 components. I don’t know if this is one of them though.
Yes that’s true Henry. I guess at first glance, I would agree with Bert the odds are very high that it’s a “made up” gun. For me if I’m shelling out that kind of dough for a model 64, I want it to be 100% factory correct or some form of expert opinion & documentation or provenance stating same. Personally for me, it defeats the purpose of the model 64 configuration without the 2/3 length magazine tube, balance, and looks but, each to their own I guess.
Rick C

November 7, 2015

Rick-
I’d like to add a 64 someday but this one would not be it. The 2/3 magazine is one feature that makes this model special and a full-length magazine would always be noticed by a knowledgeable collector. I’m afraid it would be an “excuse gun” someday and we’ve discussed that issue several times. I like unusual or different guns as you do and a factory FL mag may make it more valuable to some collectors.
Mike

March 14, 2022

TXGunNut said
Rick-I’d like to add a 64 someday but this one would not be it. The 2/3 magazine is one feature that makes this model special and a full-length magazine would always be noticed by a knowledgeable collector. I’m afraid it would be an “excuse gun” someday and we’ve discussed that issue several times. I like unusual or different guns as you do and a factory FL mag may make it more valuable to some collectors.
Mike
Mike,
I totally agree with you. If it is indeed 100% factory, I guess the buyer got a rare and unique model 64 carbine but, just not my cup of tea either!
Rick C
