Log In
Correct stock for 94
DonJamil
Guest
Guests
1
September 15, 2022 - 3:42 pm
I acquired a 94 that looks like it has been in a fire and so it no longer has the wood. I’ve read that my 1953 mfg carbine will have a wider tang than the pre-war variety. So my question is which type replacement stock will best fit? I’m still unclear whether I need to replace my wood with a pre or post stock because of the tang difference.
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 14408
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
April 15, 2005
Online2
September 16, 2022 - 12:58 am
The shape of the receiver frame on the Model 94 was altered in January 1948, and it resulted in a corresponding change to the butt stock. You did not mention the serial number (or date of manufacture) on the Model 94 that you acquired without a butt stock.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 21294
Currently Online: Bert H., Chuck, Manuel, Byron Russell, Anthony, keith shaffer, winfan, chief1966, Danny Triplett, kellswater, Bowhunter1965, Guns.com
Guest(s) 26
Top Posters:
TXGunNut: 7428
clarence: 7119
Chuck: 6739
steve004: 5706
1873man: 4926
deerhunter: 3010
twobit: 2702
Big Larry: 2578
mrcvs: 2467
Maverick: 2190
Newest Members:
Guns.com
TwoQ
Rom_c
@leatherstitcher
Judge James DeRossitt
John DeRossitt
Frank DeRossitt
Jeff Evans
Cody L. Smith
CARL1704
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 15982
Posts: 145738
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10801
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
© Simple:Press —