Log In
Correct stock for 94
DonJamil
Guest
Guests
1
September 15, 2022 - 3:42 pm
I acquired a 94 that looks like it has been in a fire and so it no longer has the wood. I’ve read that my 1953 mfg carbine will have a wider tang than the pre-war variety. So my question is which type replacement stock will best fit? I’m still unclear whether I need to replace my wood with a pre or post stock because of the tang difference.
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13846
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
April 15, 2005
Offline2
September 16, 2022 - 12:58 am
The shape of the receiver frame on the Model 94 was altered in January 1948, and it resulted in a corresponding change to the butt stock. You did not mention the serial number (or date of manufacture) on the Model 94 that you acquired without a butt stock.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 5406
Currently Online: steff, bhutch, Tony. R, D. T. PETERSON, Bill Jokela, Anthony, Bill Hanzel, Ben, Zebulon, Jeremy P
Guest(s) 478
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 7016
Chuck: 6359
steve004: 5449
1873man: 4826
deerhunter: 2842
twobit: 2611
Big Larry: 2578
mrcvs: 2332
Maverick: 2135
Newest Members:
hughmac4
Nick2night
Gerald
Bryan N
ShootClean1
slickfork85
Jameslikesgunslol
dbeids
Whinforme
EB8MAN
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 15460
Posts: 139858
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10424
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
© Simple:Press —