Log In
Correct stock for 94
DonJamil
Guest
Guests
1
September 15, 2022 - 3:42 pm
I acquired a 94 that looks like it has been in a fire and so it no longer has the wood. I’ve read that my 1953 mfg carbine will have a wider tang than the pre-war variety. So my question is which type replacement stock will best fit? I’m still unclear whether I need to replace my wood with a pre or post stock because of the tang difference.
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13688
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
April 15, 2005
Offline2
September 16, 2022 - 12:58 am
The shape of the receiver frame on the Model 94 was altered in January 1948, and it resulted in a corresponding change to the butt stock. You did not mention the serial number (or date of manufacture) on the Model 94 that you acquired without a butt stock.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 5406
Currently Online: Bill Hockett, cj57, Chuck, 1873man, win86guns, TXGunNut, Bill Hanzel, TR, Jeremy P, LeverGunner, M64lvr, Bowhunter1965, 426 Hemi
Guest(s) 1370
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6935
Chuck: 6252
steve004: 5417
1873man: 4806
deerhunter: 2798
twobit: 2595
Big Larry: 2578
mrcvs: 2309
Maverick: 2117
Newest Members:
breno74
ParaBella
schaubel777
Boatman1
Garnerman
EasyWind45
Fort smith Law
Frank1967c
Bigby1200
swmaynes
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 15348
Posts: 138539
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10363
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
© Simple:Press —