Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Case Colored 1894
Avatar
Rick C
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 869
Member Since:
March 14, 2022
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
61
December 10, 2025 - 7:16 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

He must’ve had a letter for a gun like that and no R&R or new entry and why the value decreased significantly. I’m not certain but, I don’t think Winchester would perform that kind of work for a change in caliber but Bert or somebody will know. 

 Rick C 

   

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13474
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
62
December 10, 2025 - 7:23 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

KWD57 said
A friend of mine that has since passed away had a winchester model 1876 that was a one of a thousand it had been rechambered to another caliber which required the rear of the barrel to be shortened and part of the barrel markings were removed with the barrel alterations. I do not know if winchester would do that type of alteration or would replace the barrel entirely. But I remember my friend when he sold the gun he got substantially less than what a one of one thousand went for at that time. I did not know if he had a letter on the gun but the gun was in very high condition other than the alteration. It has alway stuck in the back of my mind that if he could prove that winchester did the work would it be reduced in valuation that much. I believe he got $30,000 when they were going for over $100,000 about 15 years ago.
  

The odds are very high that Winchester did not alter that rifle.  Further, the ignorant moron that did the alteration should have been horse whipped at the hitching post!

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Tedk
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 799
Member Since:
August 27, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
63
December 10, 2025 - 8:41 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

KWD57 said
A friend of mine that has since passed away had a winchester model 1876 that was a one of a thousand it had been rechambered to another caliber which required the rear of the barrel to be shortened and part of the barrel markings were removed with the barrel alterations. I do not know if winchester would do that type of alteration or would replace the barrel entirely. But I remember my friend when he sold the gun he got substantially less than what a one of one thousand went for at that time. I did not know if he had a letter on the gun but the gun was in very high condition other than the alteration. It has alway stuck in the back of my mind that if he could prove that winchester did the work would it be reduced in valuation that much. I believe he got $30,000 when they were going for over $100,000 about 15 years ago.
  

The operative term here is, “but the gun was in very high condition other than the alteration”

“If you can’t convince them, confuse them”

President Harry S. Truman

Avatar
Maverick
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2081
Member Since:
May 23, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
64
December 10, 2025 - 9:13 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I believe there is a 1of1000 shown in the Ed Lewis book that was re-worked in such a manner. I’ll have to dig my copy of the book out and see what specific details are regarding the circumstances around the rifle. 

That said I think this is an unusual circumstance of such a thing occurring. I think the draw being that the barrel engraving having been modified effects its value to an extent. Even the type of barrel engraving affects the value of a 1of1000. The script engraved barrel marking is generally viewed as more valuable than the simpler Aerial version of the 1of1000 marking. But the Aerial version is likely actually more rarer.  

But a 1of1000 is not your average Winchester and shouldn’t be treated as such.

Sincerely,

Maverick

Avatar
KWD57
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 26
Member Since:
October 20, 2022
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
65
December 10, 2025 - 10:53 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I agree with you Bert on the horse whipping of who ever had the one of one thousand 1876 rechambered but I believe my friend would have not owned the gun most likely if it wasn’t altered.

He did tell me what he paid for it years before and he profited about 150% of what he paid.

Avatar
tionesta1
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1558
Member Since:
July 8, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
66
December 10, 2025 - 11:19 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Bert H. said

tionesta1 said

Bert H. said

KWD57 said
How would a gun that was sent back to the factory and refinished or change calibers etc. And is listed that way in the records? Would that classify as factory original?
  

With verifiable proof that a Winchester was returned and reworked (rebarreled or refinished etc.), it is my opinion that the impact to the value is almost non-existent, as the gun is still arguably “factory original”.
Bert
  

Kind of like this Model 1894 Deluxe I own?
  

Exactly… a Model 1894 that was reworked (rebarreled) by Winchester and clearly documented.  You have a very nice factory “original” Winchester
  

Thanks Bert.

Avatar
Anthony
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1203
Member Since:
December 9, 2002
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
67
December 11, 2025 - 12:22 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

Tionesta  said,

Kind of like this Model 1894 Deluxe I own?

W6062H__651411.jpg

Image Enlarger

Al,
Any of us Winchester collectors would be very pleased to own you’re rifle. What a great reference letter, from Cody. I was wondering what year it was printed and who researched it? Like Henry said, it would be nice if they all we’re like that and described the work that was done, like on yours. It sure would help us out as collectors.
 
Tony
Avatar
tionesta1
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1558
Member Since:
July 8, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
68
December 11, 2025 - 1:49 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Thanks Tony.

The letter is dated August 1, 1991, and signed by Cameron Laughlin, Curator, Cody Firearms Museum.

Al

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 5406
Currently Online: jolly bill, rogertherelic, Chris D, John D., Zebulon, Alexander Sanguigni
Guest(s) 394
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6777
Chuck: 6115
steve004: 5325
1873man: 4780
deerhunter: 2782
Big Larry: 2578
twobit: 2568
mrcvs: 2285
Maverick: 2081
Newest Members:
RHudson59
JB2026
DIESEL DOUG
Tony Short
Michael Polachek
Cotyr8807
Morg1960
Centennialrifle
fordwannabe
Chip
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 15177
Posts: 136598

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10274
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation