Log In
What’s your preference in 92 & 94 carbine & rifle. Button(1/2) or full mag?
RickC
November 19, 2006
Offline
Button.
January 19, 2017
Offline
Full.
There’s really something about both I like. Button mag would be nice in the woods for hunting & balance but full mag holds more ammo & I personally like the looks better. Hard call for me. Either as a collector.
November 7, 2015
Offline
Apparently full. Can’t seem to recall having a button mag rifle or carbine.Â
Â
Mike
June 26, 2013
Offline
Generally, I prefer a full magazine on standard length barrels. However, on short rifles the button magazine sure makes a handy well-balanced rifle. Looks pretty sexy too. This is one of my favorites:
Don
I would have to agree with all of that Don. Very nice rifle.
July 8, 2012
Offline
Don,
The button mag on your semi deluxe looks great. I think that rifle was made for it
Al
November 19, 2006
Offline
I’ll say something that may sound odd. I prefer full magazines on my .33’s. Â
I concur with that Steve. Owned 4 of them & always full mag on 33’s.
May 23, 2009
Offline
I like BOTH. I like the overall look aesthetic and balance of the button mag. But enjoy the functionality of a full magazine.
I’ve never had a 3/4 mag, so don’t know about it.
Sincerely,
Maverick
WACA #8783 - Checkout my Reloading Tool Survey!
https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-research-surveys/winchester-reloading-tool-survey/
Good point Maverick. Never owned one either but I think 3/4 mag would be a keeper for me. They have to scarce or rare. Maybe Bert has the numbers on 3/4 mag 94’s.
November 19, 2006
Offline
Ok, the topic was button mag or full. Now we’re talking about 3/4 magazine. That is generally my preference over button and full. Here’s a .32 special carbine I have with 3/4 magazine:
And here’s an ’86 extralightweight .45-70 I have with 3/4 magazine:
April 15, 2005
Offline
RickC said
Good point Maverick. Never owned one either but I think 3/4 mag would be a keeper for me. They have to scarce or rare. Maybe Bert has the numbers on 3/4 mag 94’s. Â
The number of Model 1894s with a true 3/4 magazine length is relatively small. In my survey of the Model 1894s manufactured in the 353999 – 1079689 serial number range, I have following numbers;
| Magazine Length | Quantity | % | Est. Prod Qty. |
| Full | 7,165 | 86.45% | 627,361 |
| ½ | 779 | 9.40% | 68,209 |
| â…” | 315 | 3.80% | 27,581 |
| Âľ | 26 | 0.31% | 2,277 |
| â…ž | 3 | 0.04% | 263 |
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
March 4, 2018
Offline
Full
March 20, 2010
Offline
Would this be considered 3/4 or 7/8 mag (1894)? Â
1892takedown @sbcglobal.net ......NRA Endowment Life Member.....WACA Member
"God is great.....beer is good.....and people are crazy"... Billy Currington
1892takedown said
Would this be considered 3/4 or 7/8 mag (1894)? Â
Looks 3/4 to me. Does it letter ?
April 15, 2005
Offline
1892takedown said
Would this be considered 3/4 or 7/8 mag (1894)? Â
Chris,
What is the measured length of the mag tube? Base on the picture, it appears to be a 3/4, but it could also be a special order length that specified the number of cartridges it would hold. I have seen at least a half-dozen records entries where the magazine length lists the number of cartridges it was made to hold.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
November 19, 2006
Offline
Has anyone ever seen a ledger entry that specified, “7/8” length magazine? As my .45-70 letter notes, they did specify 3/4. I’m sure some 3/4 length magazines were also listed in the ledger for the number of cartridges the customer specified. But, I am curious if there are any examples of, “7/8” noted in the ledger.
1 Guest(s)
