Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Winchester Medium Range Vernier Tang Sight
Avatar
impalacustom
Southeast Nebraska
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 34
Member Since:
July 26, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
August 24, 2021 - 4:23 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I have a couple of questions about these.  Would you ever see one on an 1885 or would they used Long Range on them?  What exactly is medium range, I know caliber would be a factor, but in general would they be like 300-400 yards?  Final question, were these actually made by Winchester or by Axtel?

Thanks

Eric

Avatar
clarence
NY
Member
Restricted
Forum Posts: 7119
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
August 24, 2021 - 1:02 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

Mid-range was standard on Special Single Shot & Schuetzen models but could be ordered on any model.  (Most Schuetzen matches were shot at 200 yds.)  Long range at that time would be considered beyond about 500 yds, closer to 700-1000, which were the target distances at the Creedmoor range, though there was no exact definition of the term.  Shooters in those days hadn’t had their eyes ruined by cell-phones & could see further.

Axtel?

Avatar
1873man
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4701
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
August 24, 2021 - 1:52 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Axtel was not a sight maker in the old days. They make modern reproduction sights.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
rogertherelic
Santa Clara, CA
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 934
Member Since:
January 27, 1992
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
August 24, 2021 - 3:58 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I am of the impression that Winchester used “Outside” contractors to make the sights they sold.  Is that correct?  RDB

Avatar
1873man
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4701
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
August 24, 2021 - 6:10 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

That is what I understand also.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
clarence
NY
Member
Restricted
Forum Posts: 7119
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
August 24, 2021 - 6:44 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

rogertherelic said
I am of the impression that Winchester used “Outside” contractors to make the sights they sold.  Is that correct?  RDB  

Winchester & Marlin thick-base sights are identical except for the hole spacing, so they must have come from the same maker.  Maybe by the time the thin-base sight came along, a different maker was involved–possibly Winchester.

Avatar
Manuel
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 545
Member Since:
February 19, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
August 24, 2021 - 8:20 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

clarence said

rogertherelic said
I am of the impression that Winchester used “Outside” contractors to make the sights they sold.  Is that correct?  RDB  

Winchester & Marlin thick-base sights are identical except for the hole spacing, so they must have come from the same maker.  Maybe by the time the thin-base sight came along, a different maker was involved–possibly Winchester.  

Would it be safe to say  that Winchester took over production of the Long range and Venier sights with the ’86 patent date that is found stamped on the bottom of the “newer” thin based tang sights?

Avatar
clarence
NY
Member
Restricted
Forum Posts: 7119
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
August 24, 2021 - 8:42 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Manuel said

Would it be safe to say  that Winchester took over production of the Long range and Venier sights with the ’86 patent date that is found stamped on the bottom of the “newer” thin based tang sights?  

Maybe, but I’d be very surprised if that patent had anything specifically to do with the thin base & was originally obtained for use in some other application. 

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: Bert H., Tedk, Chris D, SureShot, Rawhide75
Guest(s) 345
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6423
Chuck: 5840
steve004: 5191
1873man: 4701
deerhunter: 2709
Big Larry: 2551
twobit: 2497
mrcvs: 2203
Maverick: 2040
Newest Members:
4590win1886
Reddogdefense
JUSTME3275
win70pre64
Danrr
GTUDEAN
rbrettallen
mattawoman
Brad
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14775
Posts: 132162

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10023
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation