Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Winchester Ladder Sight Implementation
Avatar
25-35
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 121
Member Since:
June 28, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
March 5, 2019 - 1:50 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Seeking information on the correct manner to engage an existing ladder sight on a Winchester Model 1894 rifle; i.e., do you first remove/loosen the tension screw holding the ladder sight in place, slide the ladder sight forward and lift up? 

Seems obvious however, do not want to compromise the sight itself or the tension screw.

Also, assume the numerical graduations on the ladder sight itself do not equate in any manner to corresponding and correct yardages?

Thank-you. 

Avatar
1873man
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4693
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
March 5, 2019 - 2:16 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

They is no screw you have to loosen to raise or slide the elevator. The ladder should snap upright and stay by the spring action of the lower leaf against the barrel and the elevation slide is held by friction.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
25-35
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 121
Member Since:
June 28, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
March 5, 2019 - 2:36 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Bob, thank-you. Will try that. Any ideas regarding the numerical elevation scale on the ladder sight and corresponding distance accuracy? 

Avatar
1873man
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4693
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
March 5, 2019 - 3:11 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I don’t do a lot of shooting and never tried to figure out the sight elevation marks but they were put on them for a reason and I would assume if you used the original loads there is a correlation.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
clarence
NY
Member
Restricted
Forum Posts: 7119
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
March 5, 2019 - 4:34 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

25-35 said
Any ideas regarding the numerical elevation scale on the ladder sight and corresponding distance accuracy?   

If they corresponded to specific ranges, wouldn’t there have to be different ladders for each cartridge?  That seems rather improbable.

Avatar
tim tomlinson
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 879
Member Since:
September 19, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
March 5, 2019 - 5:16 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Folks,

  I believe the difference in trajectory for the differing calibers in the black powder era was not that great, plus the front sight could be the element used to tweak the rifle for the particular caliber.  I believe, though have not confirmed it by shooting original ammunition of course, that the yardage marks were close to what was needed for the caliber/cartridges in use at the time.  The little I have done with the .45-75 with mild loads shows the ladder sight and its yardage marks to be close to being correct out to 200 yards anyway.

Tim Tomlinson

Avatar
Chuck
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5800
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
March 5, 2019 - 7:18 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

You have to shoot your gun a lot and figure out what mark means what. 

Avatar
clarence
NY
Member
Restricted
Forum Posts: 7119
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
March 5, 2019 - 7:58 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Chuck said
You have to shoot your gun a lot and figure out what mark means what.   

Exactly what users of Lyman tang sights were expected to do–the markings on the staff had no “meanings” with respect to range.  You fired at some range of your own choosing, moved it up one index mark, then fired again to find out how much higher the group had moved on the target, & so on. 

Avatar
clarence
NY
Member
Restricted
Forum Posts: 7119
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
March 5, 2019 - 8:06 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

tim tomlinson said
I believe, though have not confirmed it by shooting original ammunition of course, that the yardage marks were close to what was needed for the caliber/cartridges in use at the time.  

That’s actually how the 82A ladder on early 52s worked, & it’s reasonably accurate.  However, it was calibrated for one bullet wt at a standardized velocity. Shoot lighter or faster bullets, & its accuracy breaks down.

Avatar
tim tomlinson
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 879
Member Since:
September 19, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
March 5, 2019 - 11:04 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Clarence,

 Roger that!

Tim

Avatar
25-35
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 121
Member Since:
June 28, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11
March 6, 2019 - 12:12 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Thanks to all for your varied and educational input. What I assumed to have been a simple answer turned out to be more involved, insightful and thought provoking. Would expect nothing less from all the SMEs on this forum!

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: Steven Gabrielli, kevindpm61
Guest(s) 168
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6400
Chuck: 5800
steve004: 5161
1873man: 4693
deerhunter: 2692
Big Larry: 2546
twobit: 2491
mrcvs: 2190
Maverick: 2025
Newest Members:
Lambeau
Larsmack
usmc1978
Otisman68
Deaf Smith
Texasaggie19
Diego
Bkmkok
Leonardb
Skysquatch82
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14700
Posts: 131484

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 9973
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation