Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Telescopic sights in 1916
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 12
Member Since:
September 30, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
November 12, 2016 - 11:22 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

All,

I recently became interested in in some features of a Model 1886, .50 Express, vintage 1916, I own. I traded for this gun 40+ years ago because I had always been a little “Big Bore” crazy and this satisfied that illness to some degree. At the time I noticed the gun had been “butchered” by someone by drilling and tapping the barrel for a scope.

A few weeks ago in this Forum, in another topic, I mentioned I owned a rifle that had two proof marks on the barrel (the same as the one on the receiver), one having been drilled through by someone wanting to mount a scope, and a second proof mark applied in place of the ruined proof mark. I speculate this work was done at the factory, though no proof, and a Cody Letter obtained on this rifle does have an “R and R” entry not ruling this out. I am referring to the same rifle above.

My question ( if you were wondering when I was going to get to the point) is; What sort of telescopic sight might have been mounted on this gun back in 1916? I know the Germans had been putting scopes on rifles for quite a while and there was the Malcolm type of sight, but I have no clue as to what might have been the right scope for this gun at that time in history. The holes drilled in the barrel indicate to me it was intended for a somewhat longish scope, relative to present day scopes. Did Winchester have sporting telescopic sights at this time that might have worked? Thanks.

John

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 881
Member Since:
September 28, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
November 12, 2016 - 1:57 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Something to think about………What year was the R&R done to it. If it was sent back to the factory for a scope it may be post 1916 which may open up more options.

 

Erin

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 12
Member Since:
September 30, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
November 12, 2016 - 2:57 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

The R and R was done in 1916 just after the rifle was sold.

John

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2324
Member Since:
December 31, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
November 12, 2016 - 4:31 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Erin Grivicich said
Something to think about………What year was the R&R done to it. If it was sent back to the factory for a scope it may be post 1916 which may open up more options.

 

Erin  

In all probability, it would have shipped with a Winchester A5 or one of their lesser power scopes. This was the best scope around that Winchester actually made. You could have one mounted on just about any Winchester of that time. Lots of them went on M52’s. Very expensive, sometimes exceeding the price of the rifle. An original scoped Winchester is a collectors prize. Post 1916, around 1927 or so, Winchester sold their scope rights to Lyman producing the famous Lyman 5A. Feckers came on board around 1925 using Winchester mounts. There were a few others, but the A5 and 5A pretty much dominated the scope market. The distance between bases was 6″ at that time period. Around 1933 or 1934 they went to the 7.2″ spacing. Unless you have it on paper, there are very few ways to prove originality.   Big Larry

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10725
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
November 12, 2016 - 7:11 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Winchester offered the A5, B3, B4, and B5 Telescopes. In my continuing survey of the Model 1885 Single Shot rifles, I have thus far recorded several hundred of them that letter with one of the aforementioned Winchester Telescopes. I would expect a factory scoped Model 1886 to have any one of those four telescopes on it.

Bert

WACA 6571L, Historian & Board of Director Member
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6281
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
November 13, 2016 - 1:38 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Big Larry said 

Feckers came on board around 1925 using Winchester mounts.   Big Larry  

Actually, 1922 was Fecker’s first year in business, and he used Winchester and Stevens mounts in about equal numbers.  Before Stevens sold out to NE Westinghouse in 1916, their double-micrometer rear mount was the best made in this country.

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6281
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
November 13, 2016 - 1:53 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bert H. said
Winchester offered the A5, B3, B4, and B5 Telescopes. In my continuing survey of the Model 1885 Single Shot rifles, I have thus far recorded several hundred of them that letter with one of the aforementioned Winchester Telescopes. I would expect a factory scoped Model 1886 to have any one of those four telescopes on it.
Bert  

No ’85s fitted for Stevens mounts?  I have a “.30 Govt.” barrel D&T for Stevens mounts, but have no way to date it.  Before 1909, however, Stevens was the big name in American scopes, and even afterwards, until the sale (or sell-out!) referred to above, Stevens top-of-the-line 7/8″ dia. model was optically superior to anything else on the market, except something custom made.

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 12
Member Since:
September 30, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
November 13, 2016 - 2:14 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I decided I should measure the distance between the bases. They measure 5 5/8″ apart, or rather the hole pattern does.  Of course the scope was mounted only on the barrel so the scope must have been mounted well to the rear in the rings. And they had to use offset scope rings due to the top ejection of that rifle. Thanks for the info. I find it fascinating that someone would consider using a scope on that gun. Maybe bad eyes.

John

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10725
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
November 13, 2016 - 2:36 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

clarence said

No ’85s fitted for Stevens mounts?  I have a “.30 Govt.” barrel D&T for Stevens mounts, but have no way to date it.  Before 1909, however, Stevens was the big name in American scopes, and even afterwards, until the sale (or sell-out!) referred to above, Stevens top-of-the-line 7/8″ dia. model was optically superior to anything else on the market, except something custom made.  

There are a small number that do letter with a Stevens Telescope, but very few in comparison to the number that letter with a Winchester Telescope. 

Original Winchester Model 1885 barrels were either marked “30 U.S.” or “.30 ARMY”.  The very small number Model 1885 barrels made in 30-06 were marked “.30 U.S.MOD.1906.”

Bert

WACA 6571L, Historian & Board of Director Member
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6281
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
November 13, 2016 - 2:56 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bert H. said 
Original Winchester Model 1885 barrels were either marked “30 U.S.” or “.30 ARMY”.  The very small number Model 1885 barrels made in 30-06 were marked “.30 U.S.MOD.1906.”

Bert  

It was one of those, just couldn’t remember without dragging it out.  But I have seen the “.30 Gov’t” marking somewhere, perhaps not Winchester.

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10725
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11
November 13, 2016 - 7:16 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

The Model 54 and pre-war Model 70 rifles were marked “.30 GOV’T’03.” and “.30 GOV’T’06.” I am not sure how Winchester marked the Model 1895 rifles in those same calibers, but I suspect it was the same.

Bert

WACA 6571L, Historian & Board of Director Member
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Troutdale, OR
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1898
Member Since:
June 26, 2013
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
12
November 13, 2016 - 8:02 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bert H. said
The Model 54 and pre-war Model 70 rifles were marked “.30 GOV’T’03.” and “.30 GOV’T’06.” I am not sure how Winchester marked the Model 1895 rifles in those same calibers, but I suspect it was the same.
Bert  

Bert,

You are correct.  I have a Model 1895 carbine from 1912 that is marked “.30 GOV’T’03”.  I once had a 1924 Model 1895 rifle marked “.30 GOV’T’06” but traded it off a few years ago.

Don

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2324
Member Since:
December 31, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
13
November 13, 2016 - 4:37 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

clarence said

Actually, 1922 was Fecker’s first year in business, and he used Winchester and Stevens mounts in about equal numbers.  Before Stevens sold out to NE Westinghouse in 1916, their double-micrometer rear mount was the best made in this country.  

clarence said

Actually, 1922 was Fecker’s first year in business, and he used Winchester and Stevens mounts in about equal numbers.  Before Stevens sold out to NE Westinghouse in 1916, their double-micrometer rear mount was the best made in this country.  

In my collection I have Fecker # 619. Lowest number I have ever seen, but not the lowest number I have heard of. That was #333 belonging to Mr. Parson of Parsons Scope Service. Both scopes appear to be custom and are quite different. Both have Winchester Grasshopper mounts. Big LarryDSCF0531.JPGImage EnlargerDSCF0526.JPGImage EnlargerDSCF0534.JPGImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6281
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
14
November 13, 2016 - 5:24 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bert H. said
The Model 54 and pre-war Model 70 rifles were marked “.30 GOV’T’03.” and “.30 GOV’T’06.” I am not sure how Winchester marked the Model 1895 rifles in those same calibers, but I suspect it was the same.
Bert  

That’s it–was shooting my 70 SG several weeks ago, and the marking stuck in my head, even though it’s a different cartridge.  The .30-40 brl. is marked .30 US.  Have a ’95 in the same, but it’s furthest back in my safe, so its marking will have to remain unknown until my executor digs it out.

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6281
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
15
November 13, 2016 - 5:57 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Big Larry said

In my collection I have Fecker # 619. Lowest number I have ever seen, but not the lowest number I have heard of. That was #333 belonging to Mr. Parson of Parsons Scope Service. Both scopes appear to be custom and are quite different. Both have Winchester Grasshopper mounts. Big LarryDSCF0531.JPGImage EnlargerDSCF0526.JPGImage EnlargerDSCF0534.JPGImage Enlarger  

Fecker offered “custom” designed scopes in countless Rifleman ads, from his first one in ’22 nearly until he died.  Hard to remember exact wording without looking it up, but it was to the general effect that whatever the customer wanted, he would build. Most other scope builders, such as Unertl, would probably have done the same thing if asked, but only Fecker went out of his way to say so openly.  The other unusual element in his advertising was frequent offerings to upgrade older Fecker scopes, which usually meant installing larger objectives.  (I have one of those, now fitted with a 1-1/2″ obj. not offered  at the time the scope was originally built.)

During the time I was actively looking for them years ago, I never saw one as low as #619.  Once had #745, mounted in a Winchester mount that had the grasshopper spring replaced with a plunger as Lyman later introduced.  That and all but two were sold about 10 yrs ago. 

Fecker moved his operation to Pittsburgh sometime after June, 1926, so any scope with the Cleveland address would have been made in ’26 or before.  Pittsburgh-produced scopes are not so marked–he merely omitted the old address. 

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2324
Member Since:
December 31, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
16
November 13, 2016 - 9:25 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Thanks for the good info.

I had a couple that were upgraded, but all are gone now. I had a real nice 24X Champion, but I gave it to a friend. This is the only one I have left.

Thanks again, Big Larry

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6281
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
17
November 14, 2016 - 12:37 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Big Larry said
Thanks for the good info.

I had a couple that were upgraded, but all are gone now. I had a real nice 24X Champion, but I gave it to a friend. This is the only one I have left.

Thanks again, Big Larry  

Looks like only way that one could be upgraded would be to have the dated & numbered card on which parallax settings for different ranges were recorded after it had been tested by a technician.  This time consuming practice ended with Fecker’s death.  Needless to say the vast majority have been lost; I’ve only heard of one that remained with the scope, and it was not for sale.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2324
Member Since:
December 31, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
18
November 14, 2016 - 1:10 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Yes, they are quite rare. I think I have seen only one. Thanks my friend.    Big Larry

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Online: deerhunter, freebird1968
Guest(s) 170
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6281
TXGunNut: 4970
Chuck: 4571
1873man: 4282
steve004: 4160
Big Larry: 2324
twobit: 2291
TR: 1710
mrcvs: 1706
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12650
Posts: 109995

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1745
Members: 8791
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation