Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Express front sights and the Lyman #3
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 440
Member Since:
July 31, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
July 15, 2024 - 4:48 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Like many of you, I am fascinated by all things Winchester.  I have a special fondness for vintage Winchester sights.  The Winchester Express sights (front and back) first showed up in the November 1887 catalog.  The rear three leaf Express sights are fairly common on the secondary market.  Not so the Express front sight.  I owned a late production 1876 Express rifle that had Express front and rear sights installed years ago.  It’s the only rifle I have ever owned that had the Express front sight.

The Express front sight appears to be a close approximation to Lyman’s #3 sight which made its commercial introduction first.  Winchester hated to give up market share, so perhaps they introduced their own version in hopes of siphoning off some sales from Lyman.  Winchester did list the “Lyman Ivory Front Sight” in their late 1880’s catalogs.  It was priced at $1.00 while the Winchester Express front sight was listed at 50 cents.

What do you think?  Was Winchester attempting to take some of Lyman’s market share?  

Winchester Express sight and Lyman #3:

Express-front-02.jpgImage EnlargerExpress.jpgImage EnlargerNumber3-01.jpgImage EnlargerNumber3-02.jpgImage Enlargerlyman2.jpgImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

I call myself a collector as it sounds better than hoarder

Avatar
NY
Member
Restricted
Forum Posts: 7119
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
July 15, 2024 - 5:06 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Since the Winchester sight used a brass bead rather than ivory, I wouldn’t say it was a direct imitation of the #3.  Lyman was the first sight maker to feature ivory beads, but their patent wouldn’t have prevented other makers from using ivory in some different configuration.  I’ve always wondered what technology was used to whittle down quickly & economically the thousands of tiny ivory beads & posts required for these sights.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5562
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
3
July 15, 2024 - 10:34 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

As a side note the earliest Lyman #3 sights do not say Lyman on them.  But there is a Patent date underneath.  It looked 5 years to find one of these for a gun that lettered with one that would be date appropriate. Patent Oct 9 85.

Avatar
NY
Member
Restricted
Forum Posts: 7119
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
July 16, 2024 - 12:24 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Chuck said
As a side note the earliest Lyman #3 sights do not say Lyman on them.  But there is a Patent date underneath.

Neither did the first tang sights, only the pat date; doesn’t seem the smartest way to market a new product. 

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6107
Chuck: 5560
steve004: 4987
1873man: 4639
Big Larry: 2500
twobit: 2470
mrcvs: 2107
Maverick: 1900
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14344
Posts: 127485

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2012
Members: 9738
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation